So Much WANT!

Old Apr 15, 2014 | 02:29 PM
  #16  
Gancherov's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,035
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: 02 WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by UKn00b
My experience has differed a little, sure the older gears are smaller and weaker for that matter but the largest issue I have seen is case deflection allowing the gear stack to shift/tweak.
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
The case is not the issue, it's the gears themselves.

Click my link.

The later year WRX 5MTs and the LGT got thicker gears. Same gears the Japanese got in the R/RA Transmissions. Many have the same gear ratios.
...and people with the LGT gears and newer 5 speeds STILL shred their gearboxes. They just take a little more force before they go.


The transmission weakness issue is twofold.
First is that the case is flexible under extreme loads (like that of an OEM powered car doing a high rev clutch dump, which is similar to a tuned up car going through a regular aggressive shift with a bunch more power)... those forces cause the input/output shafts to push against each other which in turn puts the load on the bearing surfaces, and then starts pushing the case halves apart from each other.

Once that happens, we see the secondary issue, which is that the gears are no longer fully engaged along their entire contact patch. So now you have a LOT of power, and a smaller contact patch to push on/connect across. Eventually the contact patch gets too small to hold up to the forces exerted on it and the gears break.

You can go about fixing the issue in various ways.
Make the gear ratios shorter - less resistance between the output/input shafts and therefore less deflection.
Make the gears stronger - they may be able to withstand running at the reduced contact patch under high load moments.
Make the case stronger - flexing less will keep the gears fully engaged and maintain the design specification contact patch. (blast plates may or may not be effective at doing this... I have not seen any evidence)
Change the shape/orientation of the teeth on the gears - this can change the direction of the outward forces from power throughput and make the gears much stronger (for better or worse).
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 09:53 AM
  #17  
Prettym1k3's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,695
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 99 Swap'd GM6
Originally Posted by UKn00b
My experience has differed a little, sure the older gears are smaller and weaker for that matter but the largest issue I have seen is case deflection allowing the gear stack to shift/tweak.
Isn't this Moore Performance's take on things, too? Their 600+ WHP Forester was running a "glass" Bugeye 5 speed. The gears were new, they ran their blast plates, along with upgraded drive shaft and axles. But their theory is that it's not small/weak gears that destroys the 5 speeds. It's the twist/shifting of the case halves that allow gears to get out of alignment and snap teeth.

That's my poor, non-mechanical understanding of it.
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 10:04 AM
  #18  
UKn00b's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 325
From: Hayward
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
Originally Posted by Prettym1k3
Isn't this Moore Performance's take on things, too? Their 600+ WHP Forester was running a "glass" Bugeye 5 speed. The gears were new, they ran their blast plates, along with upgraded drive shaft and axles. But their theory is that it's not small/weak gears that destroys the 5 speeds. It's the twist/shifting of the case halves that allow gears to get out of alignment and snap teeth.

That's my poor, non-mechanical understanding of it.
Well that's been my take on the matter from my own experience but like anything take nothing as fact!
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 10:25 AM
  #19  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by UKn00b
Well that's been my take on the matter from my own experience but like anything take nothing as fact!
My knowledge-free deduction of the situation was that the differences in the gears basically contributed to this issue. Meaning, all of them experience case-flex, but, since the earlier gears are much smaller, there is less material to have the gears engaged to start, to spread the load across if you will, so they fail faster. With my 2002, it was not a launch or anything abrupt when it went. I was going up a hill in 3rd, rolled on the throttle, and was around WOT by ~4k rpm when things started sounding expensive. My car was purported to be making around 275whp at the time, around that rpm.
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 11:39 AM
  #20  
UKn00b's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 325
From: Hayward
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
My knowledge-free deduction of the situation was that the differences in the gears basically contributed to this issue. Meaning, all of them experience case-flex, but, since the earlier gears are much smaller, there is less material to have the gears engaged to start, to spread the load across if you will, so they fail faster. With my 2002, it was not a launch or anything abrupt when it went. I was going up a hill in 3rd, rolled on the throttle, and was around WOT by ~4k rpm when things started sounding expensive. My car was purported to be making around 275whp at the time, around that rpm.
That pretty much summed up my experiences with different gears over the years with the exception being the PPG stuff as it looked rather beefy and spiffy yet shat itself with ease.
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 11:57 AM
  #21  
FXTbrah's Avatar
previously known as wrxBRAH
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,383
From: San Jose / Campbell
Car Info: 2004 FXT
Originally Posted by Prettym1k3
Isn't this Moore Performance's take on things, too? Their 600+ WHP Forester was running a "glass" Bugeye 5 speed. The gears were new, they ran their blast plates, along with upgraded drive shaft and axles. But their theory is that it's not small/weak gears that destroys the 5 speeds. It's the twist/shifting of the case halves that allow gears to get out of alignment and snap teeth.

That's my poor, non-mechanical understanding of it.

Interesting. Sounds like case flex is the real culprit.
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 07:57 PM
  #22  
Gancherov's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,035
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: 02 WRX Wagon
This car was making ~240whp and ~320wtq when this happened.




Last edited by Gancherov; Apr 16, 2014 at 08:05 PM.
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 08:06 PM
  #23  
queeg9k's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,849
From: Cheesesteakville
Car Info: 05 wrx wagon, 90 celica alltrac, 66 mustang
Originally Posted by Gancherov
things
Up2mtns!
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #24  
Overbear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by Gancherov
This car was making ~240whp and ~320wtq when this happened.
Looks like something inside flexed and locked up, then BOOM. Again blast plates will help with this, will it solve all the problems...no. But as part of a good plan of cryo, blast plates, and proper mounts, it will help quite a bit.


besides:

1)I am not about to give up my 4.444 gearing
2)I want the only FXT with a DCCD 5 speed in CA
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 10:42 PM
  #25  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Gancherov
This car was making ~240whp and ~320wtq when this happened.
What. The....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaliSuby
NorCal Classifieds
5
Oct 20, 2010 03:29 PM
antdiesel3
Subaru General
6
Nov 8, 2004 02:56 PM
Fulloutpwr
Suby Shopping & Maintenance/Warranty
3
Mar 6, 2004 01:21 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 AM.