Obama to tap consumers for emission, mpg standards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2009, 10:20 AM
  #16  
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
wombatsauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 7,441
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by willow
^^^Like I say. Mass produce lotus and cut the price.
And call it an MR2 Spyder. Oh wait. Hi.
wombatsauce is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:22 AM
  #17  
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
VRT Gump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yokosuka, Japan
Posts: 3,632
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
it says 35.5mph on the top line. FAIL!!!
VRT Gump is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:29 AM
  #18  
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
VRT Gump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yokosuka, Japan
Posts: 3,632
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
just a side note, my MY06 wrx got better mpg with catless turboback, headers, vf34, fuel pump, external wastegate. Most of the reason why our fuel economy sucks is the emissions that are put on it.

they just need to figure out how to get the emission items to do their jobs, and still let the cars breathe properly.
VRT Gump is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:41 AM
  #19  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
iLoqin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: No Way
Posts: 6,826
Car Info: Nadda
Like duh? Did anyone see this one coming? Obviously, Honda is already almost there. Not much of a huge thing IMO. People have been RND'ing different ways to save environment (If there is actually anything we can do, I don't believe it =P) and there have been tests with water as the main component of engines, etc. So I don't see this as a big thing. People have been working on this for years. Honda was smart to pop out the hybrid, which is why they aren't the ones in trouble, its GM that was slow and should crumble cuz of it.
iLoqin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:45 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
norcalwrx209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: <209>
Posts: 256
Car Info: 06 WRB
WOW........ i cant wait to get a freakin toyota prius............NOT
norcalwrx209 is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:55 AM
  #21  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
04caliwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Posts: 9,581
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
Originally Posted by VRT Gump
it says 35.5mph on the top line. FAIL!!!

yes it is!! I ger 27mpg on my built engine on the freeway. Perople like cars that get great performance. Likw the corvette, gtr, and many cars that sell like crazy. Whats gonna happen to ALL the people that buy a Benz? They don't need to target the customer that want a car that is good on gas. People buy a benz for a reason. They need to droop this issue ad let us the hell alone!
04caliwrx is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:58 AM
  #22  
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Yin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
^ say what?
Yin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:03 AM
  #23  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
04caliwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Posts: 9,581
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
^ can you read english? I understand it was sent from my phone so it is not gonna a be point on, but I think u get the point...
04caliwrx is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:07 AM
  #24  
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
chinoyboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hercules CA
Posts: 1,493
Car Info: 03 WRX --> 07 STI --> 10 Cayman S
Communism ftw!
chinoyboi is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:07 AM
  #25  
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Yin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Originally Posted by 04caliwrx
^ can you read english? I understand it was sent from my phone so it is not gonna a be point on, but I think u get the point...
yes.

a better questions is: can you write coherently and at least try to articulate your message regardless of typing errors? ie. i don't get your point.
Yin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:14 AM
  #26  
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Yin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Originally Posted by chinoyboi
Communism ftw!
emissions regulations = communism ??? really?


of course, wire tapping and the patriot act are much less intrusive to civilian privacy . not to mention a color-coded flash card system that tells us how frightened we should be of foreigners.
Yin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
04caliwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Posts: 9,581
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
My point is F this bull crap, if people want to buy a car that gets bad mpg let them do it. My point is it also is going to kill so many jobs for all the people that provide performance parts. Also For cars like lamborghini and ferrari who make cars for the rich and for true car enthusiast. How the hell are they gonna make a car that is fast and built how they are now if is going to ger 35mpg. They CAN'T make this happen cause of cars like this. I hope this is better
04caliwrx is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:24 AM
  #28  
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Yin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
i understand your concern for the performance industry, but you have to realize the only reason these toys are around is because there exists a market for it. there are people willing to pay, and the laws allow it, so it's done. once things change (like they have been for the history of man) consumers and the industry changes along with it. so i wouldn't worry too much about joblessness, as the talent seems to go around. they will find jobs. and like i said earlier, its only a matter of time before we start making cars with great mpg or even electrical. how many times do we have to use TESLA as the perfect example. sure its not practical at this point to think tesla is the solution, but they are blazing the trail, and that's good enough.
Yin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:26 AM
  #29  
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Yin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
also, surely you can find a more thoughtful solution than "F this bull crap"
Yin is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:34 AM
  #30  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
04caliwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Posts: 9,581
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
I understand what you are saying about the Tesla, it's a great car but how can that Tesla get me and my 6 family members to my house in Lake Tahoe? Right now it can't I have to use the 2008 Chevy Tahoe we have. I think a huge suv like the Tahoe that gets 20mpg on the way up to Tahow with 6 people is great! I think it can be made better, but 35mpg on a suv is not going to happen. And If it did it would loose ther power the car needs to take 6 people and the boat up to Tahoe. I do understand that thimes and things change, but ever since the car cam we have had racing and performance. I don't think that well ever change.


BUT we also have to think about the earth, we do need cars that are better on gas. Thants why I have a honda fit. I feel that I do my part, and the fit is how we do it.
04caliwrx is offline  


Quick Reply: Obama to tap consumers for emission, mpg standards



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 AM.