New WRX
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
New WRX
This has probably been covered, but what do you guys think of the new Rex?
http://www.subaru.com/shop/overview....trim=WRX_SEDAN
The front will take some getting used to. Im surprised they didnt do much to the rear... I think that has always been the weakest looking aspect of the car.
http://www.subaru.com/shop/overview....trim=WRX_SEDAN
The front will take some getting used to. Im surprised they didnt do much to the rear... I think that has always been the weakest looking aspect of the car.
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 735
From: san mateo
Car Info: BMW X5M. No more twinscroll LGT
Originally Posted by gh0st shad0w
Seen both models in person and I have to say Subaru's website does not do the car any justice. The 4 pots look sexy and even the stock rims are a step up.
Agreed...much better in person than the pics.
Hope the 2.5 sees higher gains w/ mods than the 2.0...TBD...sure it will though...no replacement for displacement .
Originally Posted by slvrsubywgn
Yes, I'd agree on the rims. I wanna upgrade my stock 16's to the new 17's to keep it more sleeper looking.
i'm also changing my mind again on the front end.
at first i thought it's a nice change, but after looking are real world pixs, i'm back to not liking it.
plus they gave the STI a smaller hood scoop. lol....
at first i thought it's a nice change, but after looking are real world pixs, i'm back to not liking it.
plus they gave the STI a smaller hood scoop. lol....
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,168
From: EBAIC- Wondering if I should have taken the blue pill...
Car Info: 03 WRX wagon type RA
Originally Posted by Yin
not to nit-pick, but wouldnt the 16s be even more sleeper than the 17s?
Unstble, I don't think the ride quality is gonna be better than my 16's (infact, I highly doubt it), but you are right about the traction, and stability will be better.


