Life as we know it...
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 649
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2002 Black Subaru WRX Sedan Stage 2
My facebook is blowing up with this crap.
About time... and of course oBAMMER cuts NASA spending... dumb ***.
There have been bacteria and other animals that just live in extreme climates period. Even around underwater volcanic areas with thousand degree temps, for example. About damn time... but what are we doing about it? Oh cut spending. Ty and go **** urself OBAMMER
There have been bacteria and other animals that just live in extreme climates period. Even around underwater volcanic areas with thousand degree temps, for example. About damn time... but what are we doing about it? Oh cut spending. Ty and go **** urself OBAMMER
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 236
From: Bay Area/ Home--- SLO/ School
Car Info: 07 2.5i, 02 wrx, 06 sti
About time... and of course oBAMMER cuts NASA spending... dumb ***.
There have been bacteria and other animals that just live in extreme climates period. Even around underwater volcanic areas with thousand degree temps, for example. About damn time... but what are we doing about it? Oh cut spending. Ty and go **** urself OBAMMER
There have been bacteria and other animals that just live in extreme climates period. Even around underwater volcanic areas with thousand degree temps, for example. About damn time... but what are we doing about it? Oh cut spending. Ty and go **** urself OBAMMER
Why are you referencing underwater microbes? Do you think that simply the existence of an organism in an extreme climate should automatically produce ground-breaking scientific discoveries upon financial funding and subsequent research? Do you think that NASA's funding relies solely on their ability to produce results in a small sector of their research?
Until you understand, at a basic level, what this discovery means and how it came about you should really refrain from any more input.
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,425
From: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Car Info: Corvette Z51
Seriously? You fool. Do you even understand what this discovery means?
Why are you referencing underwater microbes? Do you think that simply the existence of an organism in an extreme climate should automatically produce ground-breaking scientific discoveries upon financial funding and subsequent research? Do you think that NASA's funding relies solely on their ability to produce results in a small sector of their research?
Until you understand, at a basic level, what this discovery means and how it came about you should really refrain from any more input.
Why are you referencing underwater microbes? Do you think that simply the existence of an organism in an extreme climate should automatically produce ground-breaking scientific discoveries upon financial funding and subsequent research? Do you think that NASA's funding relies solely on their ability to produce results in a small sector of their research?
Until you understand, at a basic level, what this discovery means and how it came about you should really refrain from any more input.
Seriously? You fool. Do you even understand what this discovery means?
Why are you referencing underwater microbes? Do you think that simply the existence of an organism in an extreme climate should automatically produce ground-breaking scientific discoveries upon financial funding and subsequent research? Do you think that NASA's funding relies solely on their ability to produce results in a small sector of their research?
Until you understand, at a basic level, what this discovery means and how it came about you should really refrain from any more input.
Why are you referencing underwater microbes? Do you think that simply the existence of an organism in an extreme climate should automatically produce ground-breaking scientific discoveries upon financial funding and subsequent research? Do you think that NASA's funding relies solely on their ability to produce results in a small sector of their research?
Until you understand, at a basic level, what this discovery means and how it came about you should really refrain from any more input.
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA since there is a whole load of space out there. But instead he made cuts to it (for whatever reason, not just exploration of space) to our brilliant scientists @ NASA.
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,295
From: Davis and San Francisco
Car Info: 2005 STi Silver
This discovery was inevitable, of course there are studied things of toxic and technically inhabitable areas on OUR planet, why wouldn't it be on a different planet? This discovery is something that was long overdue, and whether the funding or not from this particular department is small or large didn't justify the idea of spending cuts... THE WHOLE IDEA OF SPENDING $$ TO FIND OUT WHAT ELSE IS OUT THERE SHOULD BE IMPORTANT.
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA since there is a whole load of space out there. But instead he made cuts to it (for whatever reason, not just exploration of space) to our brilliant scientists @ NASA.
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA since there is a whole load of space out there. But instead he made cuts to it (for whatever reason, not just exploration of space) to our brilliant scientists @ NASA.
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 236
From: Bay Area/ Home--- SLO/ School
Car Info: 07 2.5i, 02 wrx, 06 sti
This discovery was inevitable, of course there are studied things of toxic and technically inhabitable areas on OUR planet, why wouldn't it be on a different planet? This discovery is something that was long overdue, and whether the funding or not from this particular department is small or large didn't justify the idea of spending cuts... THE WHOLE IDEA OF SPENDING $$ TO FIND OUT WHAT ELSE IS OUT THERE SHOULD BE IMPORTANT.
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA since there is a whole load of space out there. But instead he made cuts to it (for whatever reason, not just exploration of space) to our brilliant scientists @ NASA.
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA since there is a whole load of space out there. But instead he made cuts to it (for whatever reason, not just exploration of space) to our brilliant scientists @ NASA.
It is truly amazing to me that people can continue to think like this. It is nothing short of a detriment to our society.
Our country is in a terrible position economically- and it's not getting any better. We maintain a staggering national debt that has thus far been unable to be brought under control. On a larger scale, the entire world economically is struggling as well. First Greece, now Ireland, and I'm sure more will follow. Do you understand there is a finite amount of money that's available to be spent? Do you understand that there is an almost endless number of better ways that money can be spent right now than on research?
Obama should have spent some cash on NASA because there is a whole load of space out there.
Before you criticize the current administration (or any administration), you had better understand what's going on. Money isn't getting cut because NASA is unimportant, it is being cut because it is less important.