FW Motorsports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 06:27 PM
  #166  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Not us.
And if it had been us, we'd own up to this **** up.
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #167  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by buzzword
Ok spill the beans, Paul - who did the work that led to this fiasco?
Full disclosure:

This is one of our customer's cars that we built back in 2009. This was a stage 1 engine and was originally built to run a stock VF39 turbo. This engine was built using the original crank and rods that had miles on them at the time.

Later the customer upgraded to run the VF39 on E85 and ran it that way for abou a year. Eventually, the customer wanted even more power and decided to upgrade the turbo to a Blouch Dom 3.0XTR and run it on E85 as well.

The customer was informed that the engine was never built to support this kind of power so there was no guarantee on how long it would hold up. The car was tuned semi-conservatively at about 23psi on E85, making about 420whp. It ran this way for about 6-7 months until one day the customer got on it and one of the original OEM rods let go.

Until this point, the car ran very well and had no major issues. This was simply too much power for the aged stock rods to handle and eventually one let go. This is certainly unfortunate for the customer, but ultimately, he was well informed and made the decision to run this power level. The known weak point of the engine was exactly what failed as expected.

This is why we don't recommend using the OEM rods for anything at or over 400whp. Our stage 2 engines with Manley I-Beam rods are meant for that kind of power range.

I hope this clears up any mysteries as we honestly have nothing to hide. I hope the customer is happy with his rebuild at FW and wish him and his car all the best in the future.

Thanks
-- Ed

Last edited by EQ Tuning; Mar 1, 2012 at 09:44 PM.
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 10:04 PM
  #168  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
Wow drama....
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 07:12 AM
  #169  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
Wow drama....
No drama...just cool pictures of death and carnage.
When mechanical creations fail, the results can be spectacular.
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 09:17 AM
  #170  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
Who is at fault here? Builder? Or customers for being warned on what could happen? Was it built in incorrectly an sloppy?
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 09:28 AM
  #171  
SkizzDawg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,572
From: The Bay Area
Car Info: 2006 STI
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
Who is at fault here? Builder? Or customers for being warned on what could happen? Was it built in incorrectly an sloppy?
If your told that you will risk getting electrocuted if you stick a fork/metal object in a wall plug outlet and you stick the fork in the wall plug outlet and get shocked, is that the wall plugs fault, PG&E, Or your own for not listening to what you were told?
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #172  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
I can see your point.. But why built/tune a future blown engine? I see both sides... Shoulda builder walk away from stuff like this even if the customer wants it that way? Or should a builder say " no I won't waste my time building an engine that won't run your power safely"?
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 10:06 AM
  #173  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
I can see your point.. But why built/tune a future blown engine? I see both sides... Shoulda builder walk away from stuff like this even if the customer wants it that way? Or should a builder say " no I won't waste my time building an engine that won't run your power safely"?
Read again... The engine was originally built to run the stock turbo and at that point in time the customer had no plans of running anywhere near 400whp and that's why he went with the stage 1 option. The engine ran great for a few years at the rated power level with no issues and would still be running well to this day.

Ultimately it is the customer's car and his decision to take the risk to go over the rated power levels. Sometimes stock rods can hold this kind of power, but sometimes they cannot. Being well informed, he took the risk and I tuned the car to try to get it to last while still meeting the customer's power goals. It lasted 6 months this way and eventually the weak link failed.

I don't believe anyone is at fault in this kind of situation. There was nothing mechanically wrong with the build. A weak part simply failed from excessive power levels. It was a risk the customer understood and accepted.

Thanks
-- Ed

Last edited by EQ Tuning; Mar 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM.
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #174  
FXTbrah's Avatar
previously known as wrxBRAH
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,383
From: San Jose / Campbell
Car Info: 2004 FXT
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
I can see your point.. But why built/tune a future blown engine? I see both sides... Shoulda builder walk away from stuff like this even if the customer wants it that way? Or should a builder say " no I won't waste my time building an engine that won't run your power safely"?
lol luckily builders arent divas and like benjamins.
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 11:43 AM
  #175  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
I know it all came down to him since you told hi
Wat could happen, that being said... I'm not blaming you. Every business is ran differently. My uncle owns a body shop in Arizona, he gives a life time warranty on anything that gets sprayed there.. He gets people who want cheap paint jobs... That won't last long and he can't give a warranty on. He just simply refuses to paint their cars. Cause when that paint starts to peel, it's his company's that did the job at the end of day. Is there a reason why he didn't return to you?
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 11:54 AM
  #176  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
I know it all came down to him since you told hi
Wat could happen, that being said... I'm not blaming you. Every business is ran differently. My uncle owns a body shop in Arizona, he gives a life time warranty on anything that gets sprayed there.. He gets people who want cheap paint jobs... That won't last long and he can't give a warranty on. He just simply refuses to paint their cars. Cause when that paint starts to peel, it's his company's that did the job at the end of day. Is there a reason why he didn't return to you?
Painting cars and modifying for power are VERY different things. There are always inherent risks in modifying cars for these kinds of power levels. We always warranty our work and builds when they are used within the rated power range.

I'm not sure why the customer chose to go to another shop, but that's none of my business as long as he happy in the end. That's all that really matters.

Thanks
-- Ed
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 01:03 PM
  #177  
old.guy's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,669
From: 2006 Zero/sports Widebody
Car Info: 500+ whp Club
Originally Posted by CaliSuby
I can see your point.. But why built/tune a future blown engine? I see both sides... Shoulda builder walk away from stuff like this even if the customer wants it that way? Or should a builder say " no I won't waste my time building an engine that won't run your power safely"?
Sucks this happened. But since its being pulled apart. Sounds like the customer is ok with it and can at least pay for the tear down.

Next is you can't control a human. They are more dangerous to an engine then the engine itself. And engines are controlled explosions. Humans in the car world will always want more, or will always want to push for more power. Only some learn you cant have it all. And its going to cost $$ to play in this world. And even having the best parts and builders in the world is still no guaranty. Even on my build I still have my stuff to deal with. And I have all name brand quality parts.

Last edited by old.guy; Mar 2, 2012 at 01:08 PM.
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 02:02 PM
  #178  
ipozestu's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,570
From: Subabrew Crew
Car Info: Broken Subarus
"Peach Hat!"
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 02:39 PM
  #179  
$hane's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 587
From: $acto
Car Info: 90 325is
I could only find a drawing with very basic dimentions. Anyone know where to find a more detailed one? Better yet, anyone in sac have a .50 round i can borrow. I guessed on most of the stuff.
Name:  2012-03-02_14-32-33_167.jpg
Views: 88
Size:  48.5 KB
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 02:44 PM
  #180  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
Wow that a HUGE bullet!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:22 AM.