found this about 9/11
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 238
From: Pleasanton, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX
Originally Posted by ryball
Sometimes kooky crap makes my laugh or it makes me think...
on the 11/8/04 update on that site they talk about that millionare that's launching the ad campaign to investigate 9/11 again. This I never thought about before "We've never gotten solid answers on why Tower 7 collapsed when it was two full blocks away from where the planes hit..." Did stuff fly out that far? The video they replayed on the news a couple a months ago (for the aniversary of it) didn't look like parts of the plane flew out through the building that far, or at least not big enough to take another one down. I can't always take stuff I read or watch for the truth (if I did, then I would have voted for bush after watching fox news
) but it helps to see things in other lights sometimes.
Originally Posted by gotwrx
huh?
I suppose airliners are made to fly into walls then?
That was a Phantom jet not a "space ship". Made of the same stuff, more or less, as an airliner, going 500 mph, about the same speed the jets were supposed to hit. Okay its smaller and the wall was specially constructed but it illustrates why you may not find much wreckage.
The facts are there were four hijacked planes and four crashes. That there is some secrecy around the Pentagon should come as no suprise because it's the Military headquarters.
The building was big enough it could certainly swallow the whole plane and the hole in the inner wall can most likely be explained by the shock wave caused by the impact. The crash looks different from the Twin towers because the building is constructed differently.
Your entitled to believe any kooky theory you want but if you are going to be a skeptic you only hurt your case by applying your skepticism selectively.
49% voted against Bush for all number of reasons but I doubt many of them did to so on the basis of this theory. If they did then we are certainly doomed.
I suppose airliners are made to fly into walls then?
That was a Phantom jet not a "space ship". Made of the same stuff, more or less, as an airliner, going 500 mph, about the same speed the jets were supposed to hit. Okay its smaller and the wall was specially constructed but it illustrates why you may not find much wreckage.
The facts are there were four hijacked planes and four crashes. That there is some secrecy around the Pentagon should come as no suprise because it's the Military headquarters.
The building was big enough it could certainly swallow the whole plane and the hole in the inner wall can most likely be explained by the shock wave caused by the impact. The crash looks different from the Twin towers because the building is constructed differently.
Your entitled to believe any kooky theory you want but if you are going to be a skeptic you only hurt your case by applying your skepticism selectively.
49% voted against Bush for all number of reasons but I doubt many of them did to so on the basis of this theory. If they did then we are certainly doomed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joltdudeuc
Teh Politics Forum
1
Oct 11, 2008 01:29 PM