Ferrari wants its own WRX so it making an AWD hatchback. No, seriously!!!
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,506
From: BorderJumperEnforcer's momma's house
Car Info: Fast
That is the FIRST EVER Ferarri to EVER make my caulk really hard. This is the sickest hatchback EVER!!! OMG, this seriously makes me horny in a weird way... I think I'd sell my house to live in the car, SERIOUSLY.
PLEASE GOD MAKE ME WIN THE SUPER LOTTO!!!!! PLEASEEEEE!!!!!!
PLEASE GOD MAKE ME WIN THE SUPER LOTTO!!!!! PLEASEEEEE!!!!!!
i-Club Sympathizer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,165
From: Mazda NAO
Car Info: 1969 BMW R75/5 & Work Whip
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,046
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
The funny thing is, when I was looking it up, there was an image comparing that pic to the new Mazda 3 
i-Club Sympathizer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,165
From: Mazda NAO
Car Info: 1969 BMW R75/5 & Work Whip
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
LOL
still remember the day i brought my bugeye home. i was all juiced, but my gf just said, "you spent all that money on a fast @$# neon??"
but that new Ferrari is pretty fugly. well, not horrid, but doesn't do much for me. 355 was pretty smooth. 430 is pretty ok too. 458 is a lil awkward, but on paper, that thing is pretty sweet.
that said, as blasphemic as an AWD F-car is, biz-wise can't blame them. no one's beating down the showroom doors for sports cars or even coupes anymore. Porsche found that out. at least this pending F-car isn't as fug as the first gen Cayenne (new one's sexy tho)
still remember the day i brought my bugeye home. i was all juiced, but my gf just said, "you spent all that money on a fast @$# neon??"
but that new Ferrari is pretty fugly. well, not horrid, but doesn't do much for me. 355 was pretty smooth. 430 is pretty ok too. 458 is a lil awkward, but on paper, that thing is pretty sweet.
that said, as blasphemic as an AWD F-car is, biz-wise can't blame them. no one's beating down the showroom doors for sports cars or even coupes anymore. Porsche found that out. at least this pending F-car isn't as fug as the first gen Cayenne (new one's sexy tho)
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
^ It does seem like blasphemy for Ferrari to go with AWD, but we'll see how well that car does eventually. This new Ferrari is definitely not one of their prettier cars.
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 694
From: vallejo ca
Car Info: 04 WRX & 01 NEON "SRT0"
looks wise
#1subie
#2 ferrari- just doesnt look right, not saying i wouldnt take one just if i had ferrari money that aint the one id buy
#100 bmw - things hella ugly
#1subie
#2 ferrari- just doesnt look right, not saying i wouldnt take one just if i had ferrari money that aint the one id buy
#100 bmw - things hella ugly
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
This opens them up to a WHOLE new market of people. Imagine if Ferrari offered the hatch for the price of a Porsche turbo? The Ferrari would DOMINATE sales...
Imagine if Ferrari joined the WRC with that?!??! *Gasm*
Imagine if Ferrari joined the WRC with that?!??! *Gasm*
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,425
From: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Car Info: Corvette Z51
Not sure if I like it or not. It's like, it doesn't look quite "right", but it doesn't look all "bad" either. It's like... a very pretty man... or a handsome woman... I'm so confused right now. 
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Also, here's a quote from the article:
Then WHY THE HELL does it weigh just shy of 4,000 lbs?! That things is really heavy... Why?
The FF features the company's first ever four-wheel drive system. Ferrari claims its 4RM (four-wheel drive) weighs 50% less than a conventional four-wheel drive system, maintaining a rear-biased weight distribution (53 per cent over the rear axle).
Then WHY THE HELL does it weigh just shy of 4,000 lbs?! That things is really heavy... Why?