Car&Driver explains the FB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #16  
bobb126's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,345
From: Sacramento
Car Info: '01 GC8 & '96 OBS
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
For 7 yrs the Sti has put out 300 hp( nevermind the monstorous 5hp jump of late) so when will Subaru say "hey, look at that" in response to everyother company upping the anty? Looking at the preformance numbers for the '11 wrx and Sti and seeing the Driving sports video of the '07vs'11 sti quarter mile times in the low 14s? Really weak. When Subaru announces the arrival of the 375hp Sti, then improvements will be satisfactory. Isn't the Wrx and Sti supposed to be "giant killers"?Not anymore!
I'd definitely like to see that 375hp STi, but there's more to it then just throwing on some extra hp. I know what you mean, but it'd take them a while to do it.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #17  
antonch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 276
From: SF, CA
Car Info: 06 STI
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
For 7 yrs the Sti has put out 300 hp( nevermind the monstorous 5hp jump of late) so when will Subaru say "hey, look at that" in response to everyother company upping the anty? Looking at the preformance numbers for the '11 wrx and Sti and seeing the Driving sports video of the '07vs'11 sti quarter mile times in the low 14s? Really weak. When Subaru announces the arrival of the 375hp Sti, then improvements will be satisfactory. Isn't the Wrx and Sti supposed to be "giant killers"?Not anymore!
The WRX is actually competitive right now with 265hp. The STI is not. If I were to purchase a new impreza right now, I would probably go with with the WRX. The STI is not much faster (if at all) in quarter mile. I agree that STI motor needs a big boost in HP. 300 is not impressive by todays standards.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 09:47 AM
  #18  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
A longer stroke and smaller bore is more efficient in theory. The EJ motors have a notoriously short stroke and many people blame that for their lack of efficiency as compared to the EVO motors. What I find funny is that they went to great lengths to fully redesign the engine but the gains are very minimal. Hopefully the potential will be revealed in the turbo applications.

-- Ed
yes efficiency is what they were going for, but an increase of 11mm stroke increases the piston speed by a little over 10% (3369fpm vs 3838fpm) the higher the piston speed the less RPM you can safely run, the increased speed also raises cylinder temps which doesnt lend itself well to shoving hot air into. Like I said, be glad its not on the EJs
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #19  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Already seeing these in customer's cars.

Rods should not be an issue, as this design has been used for years.









Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #20  
stupidchicken03's Avatar
Churro Aficionado
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54,661
From: IG - @thomas.teammoist
Car Info: IG - @TEAMMOISTOFFICIAL
What are the thoughts on the plastic intake mannys?
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #21  
Unit 91's Avatar
i-Club Sympathizer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,165
From: Mazda NAO
Car Info: 1969 BMW R75/5 & Work Whip
Paul,

I'm sure you already know, but here goes anyhow... Subaru is requiring the use of their own synthetic oil (0w20) to maintain warranty on the new FB motor. The filter is a new filter and the DP is a 'new' one as well.

Just in case no one told you.

Cheers,
Ryan
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #22  
johndabrit's Avatar
Da Brit.
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,811
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: http://tinyurl.com/3vo4362
Originally Posted by stupidchicken03
What are the thoughts on the plastic intake mannys?
was just looking at this. I iz confused.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 02:43 PM
  #23  
brucelee's Avatar
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Anyone else see "the FB" as "The Facebook"?
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:26 PM
  #24  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by Unit 91
Paul,

I'm sure you already know, but here goes anyhow... Subaru is requiring the use of their own synthetic oil (0w20) to maintain warranty on the new FB motor. The filter is a new filter and the DP is a 'new' one as well.

Just in case no one told you.

Cheers,
Ryan
What I wonder is how Subaru or any manufacturer can require a particular fluid/part and not provide it for free, under The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act .
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #25  
aboothman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,506
From: BorderJumperEnforcer's momma's house
Car Info: Fast
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
For 7 yrs the Sti has put out 300 hp( nevermind the monstorous 5hp jump of late) so when will Subaru say "hey, look at that" in response to everyother company upping the anty? Looking at the preformance numbers for the '11 wrx and Sti and seeing the Driving sports video of the '07vs'11 sti quarter mile times in the low 14s? Really weak. When Subaru announces the arrival of the 375hp Sti, then improvements will be satisfactory. Isn't the Wrx and Sti supposed to be "giant killers"?Not anymore!
First off I want to say that THE STI IS NOT A DRAG CAR. If you buy one to drag race you are a fool. If you base your decision to buy something else because of a 14 second 1/4 mile time in a ****ty publication, GOOD.

ANd then more of this "only 300 hp, meh" crap? Do YOU have a reliable 375 Hp car? Do YOU have a built engine with a bigger turbo on it? It can be a pain in the ***...even when you spend a crap ton of money to make it the cleanest setup possible. It is no long er a car that you can check the oil, get in, and drive. Assuming you do check your oil

These engines are barely reliable at 300 hp, especially if you beat on it with the stock tune. A stage 2 car MIGHT make 375 hp on pump, but it will be pushing the envelops of safety to make it there. You will be also be $1000+ in the hole in aftermarket parts, tuning, etc. AND you will have maintenance requirements that are increased over stock.

The fact is these OEM 2.5l engines are not really meant to be reliable, high performance, and cheap. The saying is you have to pick two of those. OEM has to meet all 3, or people will stop buying the car.

IF you want a 375-400 hp car that is cheap, reliable, and fast then buy the 2011 Mustang GT, or one of the other incredibly high cost/ performance ratio cars out there now. ESPECIALLY IF YOU GIVE A **** ABOUT DRAG RACING.

End of story.

Edit: now when friends buy a WRX or STI and ask me what to do I tell them "stage 2 VF-39/34, tune with supporting mods, and drive the **** out of it with good gas. Then save your money for tires, brake pads, and suspension parts."

Last edited by aboothman; Feb 3, 2011 at 03:37 PM.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #26  
Unit 91's Avatar
i-Club Sympathizer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,165
From: Mazda NAO
Car Info: 1969 BMW R75/5 & Work Whip
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
What I wonder is how Subaru or any manufacturer can require a particular fluid/part and not provide it for free, under The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act .
That makes more than one of us wondering the same thing. I can't get a straight answer out of them and I've asked many times.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:34 PM
  #27  
stupidchicken03's Avatar
Churro Aficionado
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54,661
From: IG - @thomas.teammoist
Car Info: IG - @TEAMMOISTOFFICIAL
Originally Posted by Unit 91
Paul,

I'm sure you already know, but here goes anyhow... Subaru is requiring the use of their own synthetic oil (0w20) to maintain warranty on the new FB motor. The filter is a new filter and the DP is a 'new' one as well.

Just in case no one told you.

Cheers,
Ryan
Wow... Nice to know a head of time!
Any other car co's doing that??
Originally Posted by johndabrit
was just looking at this. I iz confused.
At what I wrote or at it being plastic?
Originally Posted by brucelee
Anyone else see "the FB" as "The Facebook"?
Yes
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:43 PM
  #28  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
^ I'm not 100% sure, but I think Mitsubishi has something like that for the Evos. When I've looked underneath the hood of Evos, there's a sticker saying that Mobil 1 oil only. I assume that means you have to use that oil for warranty.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 05:20 PM
  #29  
damianwrb07's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 649
From: turlock ca
Car Info: '14 Wrx Hatchback
Originally Posted by aboothman
First off I want to say that THE STI IS NOT A DRAG CAR. If you buy one to drag race you are a fool. If you base your decision to buy something else because of a 14 second 1/4 mile time in a ****ty publication, GOOD.

ANd then more of this "only 300 hp, meh" crap? Do YOU have a reliable 375 Hp car? Do YOU have a built engine with a bigger turbo on it? It can be a pain in the ***...even when you spend a crap ton of money to make it the cleanest setup possible. It is no long er a car that you can check the oil, get in, and drive. Assuming you do check your oil

These engines are barely reliable at 300 hp, especially if you beat on it with the stock tune. A stage 2 car MIGHT make 375 hp on pump, but it will be pushing the envelops of safety to make it there. You will be also be $1000+ in the hole in aftermarket parts, tuning, etc. AND you will have maintenance requirements that are increased over stock.

The fact is these OEM 2.5l engines are not really meant to be reliable, high performance, and cheap. The saying is you have to pick two of those. OEM has to meet all 3, or people will stop buying the car.

IF you want a 375-400 hp car that is cheap, reliable, and fast then buy the 2011 Mustang GT, or one of the other incredibly high cost/ performance ratio cars out there now. ESPECIALLY IF YOU GIVE A **** ABOUT DRAG RACING.

End of story.

Edit: now when friends buy a WRX or STI and ask me what to do I tell them "stage 2 VF-39/34, tune with supporting mods, and drive the **** out of it with good gas. Then save your money for tires, brake pads, and suspension parts."
Do you work for Subaru? How do you know the thin line between reliability and pushing the 2.5 past it's limits? The quarter mile times were simply an example of the cars raw power and i'm a subaru guy and would like to see some improvements power wise. I did not buy the car for dragracing but would like to see some attemp at getting a bit more out of the Sti
End of story.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 06:42 PM
  #30  
aboothman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,506
From: BorderJumperEnforcer's momma's house
Car Info: Fast
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
Do you work for Subaru? How do you know the thin line between reliability and pushing the 2.5 past it's limits? The quarter mile times were simply an example of the cars raw power and i'm a subaru guy and would like to see some improvements power wise. I did not buy the car for dragracing but would like to see some attemp at getting a bit more out of the Sti
End of story.
I think everybody with a clue knows by now that these engines have some serious limitations...unless you throw a bunch of money at them.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 PM.