cable or dsl which one and why?
12-18-2002, 01:01 PM
#2
cable - it's fast if you are the only or few customers in your area. you split the connection with whoever is using it in your area.
dsl - dedicated connection. but limited range. the furter away from the central office you are. the worst the connection gets...
dsl - dedicated connection. but limited range. the furter away from the central office you are. the worst the connection gets...
12-18-2002, 01:02 PM
#3
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: BAIC Wagon/Sedan Clique
Posts: 4,331
Car Info: a few WRX's and a Z ;)
i would recomment sprint's microwave technology... but they are not taking any more customers.
i say DSL (but find out how far away you are from the switchyard)... the closer u r the siwtchyard the betah
i say DSL (but find out how far away you are from the switchyard)... the closer u r the siwtchyard the betah
12-18-2002, 01:05 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 349
I went with the dsl from pac bell. Why? I dont have cable and assumed that getting cable installed would be extra and I live in a place (apartment) that I wont be living in next year. 30 bucks a month for the first 6 months or maybe its 39 i dunno. I really did not look at all the options as you are!!
12-18-2002, 01:29 PM
#6
cable if you can get it.
plain and simple, it's faster than ADSL.
plus it's around $40, vs $50 for xDSL.
biggest downside to cable is they wont let you run your own servers and you dont get a static IP.
NOW, and this is a big now..., att just merged with COMCAST,
around feb 2003, att customers will get notified of the changes. comcast says we will get a few more stuff. what that is, they wont say...
all i ask is GIVE ME HDTV ON CABLE TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
plain and simple, it's faster than ADSL.
plus it's around $40, vs $50 for xDSL.
biggest downside to cable is they wont let you run your own servers and you dont get a static IP.
NOW, and this is a big now..., att just merged with COMCAST,
around feb 2003, att customers will get notified of the changes. comcast says we will get a few more stuff. what that is, they wont say...
all i ask is GIVE ME HDTV ON CABLE TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12-18-2002, 02:52 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
http://www.dslreports.com
all the info you'll ever want or need
btw i am 10690 feet away from CO. that's not too bad.
Perhaps I'll go to covad.com they have some decent speeds and several specials now.
Att cable has 29.95 per mo for 6 month special too.
Dam..decisions... decisions...
all the info you'll ever want or need
btw i am 10690 feet away from CO. that's not too bad.
Perhaps I'll go to covad.com they have some decent speeds and several specials now.
Att cable has 29.95 per mo for 6 month special too.
Dam..decisions... decisions...
12-18-2002, 02:59 PM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kandahar, Afghanistan
Posts: 1,305
Car Info: 09 E90 M3 SEDAN w/DCT
I am on SBC, and it sucks. I am only able to pull about 160Kbs down.
On dslreports.com, and broadbandreports.com, it shows that I have a 1.5M down speed, but I don't see that?
On dslreports.com, and broadbandreports.com, it shows that I have a 1.5M down speed, but I don't see that?
12-18-2002, 03:37 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
I've had both cable and DSL. I found the cable to be more reliable. I am ALWAYS resetting the damned modem with the DSL line we have now. Someone mentioned not being able to get a static IP from cable as a downside... well, most services providers DON'T provide static IP's so that's a non-issue. Also be aware that most DSL service providers are middle men for Pac Hell. This could be a good thing as dealing with Pac Hell has always been a nightmare in the best case scenario.
2 - 5 years from now this "last mile" crap should all be wireless.
2 - 5 years from now this "last mile" crap should all be wireless.
12-18-2002, 03:40 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by BADWRX
I am on SBC, and it sucks. I am only able to pull about 160Kbs down.
On dslreports.com, and broadbandreports.com, it shows that I have a 1.5M down speed, but I don't see that?
I am on SBC, and it sucks. I am only able to pull about 160Kbs down.
On dslreports.com, and broadbandreports.com, it shows that I have a 1.5M down speed, but I don't see that?
12-18-2002, 03:47 PM
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kandahar, Afghanistan
Posts: 1,305
Car Info: 09 E90 M3 SEDAN w/DCT
Then why is my father in law in Japan on Yahoo BB clocking only 800K down on dslreports.com, and broadbandreports.com, but his damn download speed in 700Kbs! All for only $25 a month!
But anyways, the math doesn't add up!
Andy
But anyways, the math doesn't add up!
Andy
12-18-2002, 04:16 PM
#15
oh i forgot to add, most DSL installs these days uses the PPPOE crap...
so your machine has to authenticate first for the mothership before granting access.
unless of course you run a router box which will do the PPPOE'ing for ya.
so your machine has to authenticate first for the mothership before granting access.
unless of course you run a router box which will do the PPPOE'ing for ya.