Arizona's trying to take their cameras down...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
huck's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,197
From: San Ramon, Ca
Car Info: 2013 GR STi
Arizona's trying to take their cameras down...

http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/ & http://www.arizonacitizensagainstphotoradar.com/

The fight is specific to Arizona at the moment but, with the state of our current economy, I wouldn't be surprised if we see speed cameras going up in California soon. Might want to help them out before this becomes standard nationwide...

Our Purpose: Top Five Reasons:

1. Safety. That fancy electronic box with a camera and flash bulb might catch a speeder or red-light runner, but it won’t pull over the speeder or red-light runner that’s drunk/high that heading towards your car at the next intersection. That’s why we have police officers.

2. Privacy. We don’t believe the role of government is to spy on its citizens, no matter how well intentioned such a program might be. “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither,” said Ben Franklin, and we’re inclined to agree.

3. Sovereignty. Imagine waking up one morning to see this Australian police car in your rear-view mirror on the Loop 101. Imagine the foreign-born officer walking up to your window and demanding your information from you. Then, imagine your outrage when he has the nerve to write YOU a citation, only to find out that your government has outsourced law enforcement to another nation. Such a scenario isn’t a dystopian future, but rather business-as-usual for the cities and state agencies that rely on Rexflex Group, the “Umbrella Corporation” of traffic control systems. And yes, they’re an Australian company.

4. Due Process. When a police officer stops you and writes a ticket, he has to verify the person’s identity and make sure he gets his paperwork right in order for the ticket to stand up in court. In addition, you’re personally “served” the complaint by the police officer.With automated enforcement, cities and the state send you a copy of the ticket via mail, and according to their own laws such a mailing is not proper service. They instead hope you’ll incriminate yourself by responding to the complaint. Lets be clear: unless you voluntarily waive your rights and respond to some random solicitation in the mail, the only form of proper service for a photo radar ticket is to be served by a licensed and bonded process server. In fact, the notices sent in the mail usually threaten you into compliance, saying that if you don’t respond, you’ll have to pay for your own service if they choose to hire a process server!

5. Cronyism. We’re all for free-market capitalism, but by commercializing law enforcement activities and awarding no-bid contracts to such companies, we’re rewarding mediocrity. Today it’s “just” traffic citations, tomorrow it could be Blackwater taking over the functions of the Mesa Police Department. When corporations and governments conspire against the will of the people, rights are lost and freedoms are destroyed.
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #2  
eastbaysubaru's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,665
From: No So Co
Car Info: '00 BRP RS Sedan / '04 PSM FXT (RIP)
Fu*k speed cameras. This ain't no Great Britain!

-Brian
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
Lurk's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,779
From: Snatchin' your people up
Car Info: Hilux Double Cab with a Dishka on top
Those cameras can kiss my ***.
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #4  
JelloChex's Avatar
aka FlukeWRX
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,657
From: East Bay
Car Info: '03 WRX WRB Sedan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvtvfSJi2fg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOx8A-TzHoQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnkp2sT8zkg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph-qv4gYAE8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h9ppctqktk

Last edited by JelloChex; Jun 4, 2009 at 07:37 PM.
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
iLoqin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
The idea about the cameras causing more hazards than safety has been going around, I posted this information a few years ago. People got in more accidents due to cameras being at the intersection. More rear ends than collisions at the intersections. People are starting to finally realize that and stop to this retarded money scam.
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #6  
Spoolin415's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,932
From: ...
Car Info: .
Originally Posted by iLoqin
The idea about the cameras causing more hazards than safety has been going around, I posted this information a few years ago. People got in more accidents due to cameras being at the intersection. More rear ends than collisions at the intersections. People are starting to finally realize that and stop to this retarded money scam.
If its retarded and a scam, its coming to California.

We usually beat other states to the punch on this stuff, so look for our version to be even more ridiculous than theres.

Oh, and the difference? Californians will sit there and take it in the *** like they do everything else. Pun intended.
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #7  
yayitzian's Avatar
Hurray, it's Ian!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,612
From: on an airplane
Car Info: 2002 MBP WRX Sedan
there's already tons of cameras at select intersections in CA...Just not on the highway....yet
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
woocabin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,184
From: Pleasanton /La Jolla
Car Info: 2005 Stg.2 Wrx
Pleasanton has no red light cameras, but we do have surveillance cameras. =]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
I<3subie
Bay Area
22
Nov 6, 2008 10:10 PM
Subie do
Videos
0
Apr 5, 2007 12:39 AM
STi-owns-evo
SoCal
5
May 22, 2006 02:03 AM
LordWorm16
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
8
Jul 5, 2004 12:41 AM
bp_rex
Mid-Atlantic
2
Mar 11, 2003 11:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:04 PM.