apple i-phone thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #61  
Flanders's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 629
From: SF
Car Info: '00 GT Wagon, BP wannabe
I find that people that know how to use a computer very well have fewer problems than most. I have been providing tech support for both Mac and windows for over 10 years.

I am sure that I could run windows as successfully as I run my mac, in fact I have. I simply prefer a Mac and only have to use my roommates Dell for surfing (and troubleshooting his problems).
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #62  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by stevenkhau
how so? i use XP Pro extensively at work along with Unix and Linux. I run a MacBook Pro at home along with an MCE2005 machine for gaming and TIVO functions. All OSes are extremely stable, even with all the software/games I install and uninstall on the MCE 2005 machine. All are extremely good at what they do.

The myth of Windows instability and insecurity should be buried now that Win95-WinME has been long buried and burned.

I said software...as in microsoft office. It's worthless. It is so far behind it's rediculous. Unfortunately they have such a stronghold on the industry that they aren't forced to make necessary improvements. There are better options out there.

The currect OS is fine. I have no problems with it. I ran XP on my Dell. I find it funny that the new OS coming out has a butt load of features and styles stolen from OSX. I've run quite a few of their systems including NT variations. I used to work with my tech guy at SBC to stay current with that while the company itself fell behind..mac and PC as I had both.

Me personally...I had a PC for many years. I have worked on both and have no problems with it. I just prefer the apple. I find it easier, faster and more productive to work in.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 04:33 AM
  #63  
suby_dude's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,331
From: BAIC Wagon/Sedan Clique
Car Info: a few WRX's and a Z ;)
well i've tried every other phone.

why not this one.

i have the black berry right now... and it works... one thing about phones is that they never really last for me... too many "dropped phones". but amazingly this blackberry has lasted w/ me.

the apple device seems like it can't take much abuse. if it is as fragile as my ipod photo, its prolly not gonna last w/ me.

oh btw... thx steve jobs for replacing my ipod photo twice!

-sd
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 05:47 AM
  #64  
suby_dude's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,331
From: BAIC Wagon/Sedan Clique
Car Info: a few WRX's and a Z ;)
hatetorade anyone?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../wapple111.xml

-sd
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #65  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
why didn't then just call it ifone...maybe release it in the philippines and union city as the ipone
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #66  
platypus's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,445
From: GST Motorsports - Rally Division
Car Info: dangerous with a wrench
For my money, I'll be waiting for the next iteration of Apple phones. Apple's going to go into the mobile market in a big way, probably aiming to be the next Nokia. The first phone's no more than a shot across the bow, to be honest.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #67  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
Originally Posted by platypus
For my money, I'll be waiting for the next iteration of Apple phones. Apple's going to go into the mobile market in a big way, probably aiming to be the next Nokia. The first phone's no more than a shot across the bow, to be honest.
Formerly: Apple Computer Inc.

Currently: Apple Inc.

Future: Apple iStuff Inc. ???
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #68  
Flanders's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 629
From: SF
Car Info: '00 GT Wagon, BP wannabe
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/01/11/phil-...hone-features/

This is probably the best quick vid of this crazy thing in action.

I saw it today. I can't stop laughing at all the people taking pictures of it with their cell phones. There is a huge theater and it is packed with people watching a demo of the product. IT spills out into the aisles.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #69  
blue blurr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,312
From: Why the **** is
Car Info: this required information?
You people and your crazy phones... I'm young and all I want a phone for is to talk. I never take pics, never text. I would never spend 500+ dollars on a friken phone.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #70  
subie OCD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,808
From: Concord
Car Info: 04 STi
Originally Posted by blue blurr
You people and your crazy phones... I'm young and all I want a phone for is to talk. I never take pics, never text. I would never spend 500+ dollars on a friken phone.
I agree...although I would buy it for $200. Then I could sell my ipod nano that I got for free.

A phone, 4gb ipod and a 2mp camera...cant go wrong.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #71  
pwn's Avatar
pwn
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,498
From: Dublin, California
Car Info: 09 STi, 10 Cayman S
Ive been holding out on getting an ipod for a while, waiting for one of the rumors to become a product, and here it is . + I need a new phone, well don't need but want one, and 500 is basically 250$ for a phone and 250$ for an ipod. If you need both devices, its easier to look at it that way.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 07:14 AM
  #72  
suby_dude's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,331
From: BAIC Wagon/Sedan Clique
Car Info: a few WRX's and a Z ;)
i've watched the keynote and been through the apple's iphone site a few times... everything looks great... however... 4GB or 8GB storage? seems a little lacking for video/music use don't u think?

-sd
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 07:42 AM
  #73  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
... it's still has a touch screen and no buttons.

I like what my iPod does and I like what my phone does and they work better seperately. Could you imagine the battery life of combining those two products and adding a huge screen to the equation?

In the end, all you paying for is a "Look what I got!" product. It's nothing more than the most expensive toy on the shelf. For a lot of people, that's all it needs to be for them to want it.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #74  
suby_dude's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,331
From: BAIC Wagon/Sedan Clique
Car Info: a few WRX's and a Z ;)
i'm just waiting for someone to make a compact SLR camera that's also a phone!
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #75  
HongKongBeef's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,330
From: http://www.winning-smiles.com
Car Info: 2016 Red WRX
The phone is sexay.. BUT...

You have to figure in the cost of sending the phone to apple every year to replace the battery at $100. No removable battery on that phone + no way in hell that phone will get decent battery life = extra $100/year to maintain it. Plus you gotta add a data plan. Maybe its like my $10/month sprintpcs data plan. It could be like those $50/month blackberry plans.. who knows yet.

All that adds up to 1 EXPENSIVE phone. REALLY expensive considering you cant even put 3rd party applications on it.. making it not even a PDA/smartphone. The real draw to phones in this price range is all the 3rd party applications.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM.