amazing deal for 28" 1080p

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 01:47 AM
  #16  
evsoul's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,588
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: 2005 Unicorn
Originally Posted by adizon
The contrast ratio seems pretty low though "Contrast Ratio: 800:1" less value range = less color accuracy. I'd have to see it in person. But that's just me and what's important to me Maybe 800:1 isn't too bad! and 28" is huge!
let me explain something to you real quick.

the contrast ratio is the worst way to rate a monitor.

Manufactures will test their screens and find the BRIGHTEST pixel and say ok that brightest pixel is 1000 and the lowest is 1, so its 1000:1....... its the contrast difference between white and black.
that means ONE pixel out of the MANY is a high number. its a marketing strategy to make a screen look better than what it is. the average screen is 400-500 to 1, meaning 400:1 or 500:1.. which means if you averaged out the pixel brightness they would fall between 400 and 500 :1

so remember when you see a screen that says 3000:1 it means the brightest pixel they found was 3000 on the scale of contrast/brightness.

so technically a monitor that has 10000:1 could actually have a lower AVERAGE contrast ratio than one with 800:1

Last edited by evsoul; Dec 20, 2007 at 02:01 AM.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 02:24 AM
  #17  
Hollandaze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,245
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: 14 Mazda3 sGT, SOLD 12/26: 00 2.5RS Sedan
Originally Posted by evsoul
let me explain something to you real quick.

the contrast ratio is the worst way to rate a monitor.

Manufactures will test their screens and find the BRIGHTEST pixel and say ok that brightest pixel is 1000 and the lowest is 1, so its 1000:1....... its the contrast difference between white and black.
that means ONE pixel out of the MANY is a high number. its a marketing strategy to make a screen look better than what it is. the average screen is 400-500 to 1, meaning 400:1 or 500:1.. which means if you averaged out the pixel brightness they would fall between 400 and 500 :1

so remember when you see a screen that says 3000:1 it means the brightest pixel they found was 3000 on the scale of contrast/brightness.

so technically a monitor that has 10000:1 could actually have a lower AVERAGE contrast ratio than one with 800:1
In a way, it's sorta like basing the quality of a digital camera with megapixels? Even if a cheapo digital camera is 10 megapixels, it's still a piece of crap versus a quality camera with 8 megapixels?
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #18  
evsoul's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,588
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: 2005 Unicorn
^^well in a sense.

but when they say its 10MP the camera actually is 10MP. while this is more like.. guess what its 1000:1 contrast ratio.. but... you won't notice it.. but... big numbers are good so buy it! haha.

put an LCD tv with 1000:1 and another similar LCD tv with 800:1 and tell me if you see the difference, even in a dimly lit room (which is the only time you would ever really notice it if you could notice it)
remember the contrast ratio is the difference in brightness between the brightest white and the darkest black. so if you have 1000:1 the black is 1000 times darker than the brightest white.

its a marketing technique that works. at compusa many people come in and look at the tv's with the high contrast ratio and ignore the lower contrast ratio tv's because they think they are not as good.. its like when you buy a car and they say "26mpg street, 30,mpg freeway" those number are typically tested in unrealistic scenarios like a wind tunnel with no resistance to the car.. giving it the best numbers possible.. so you are expecting this great number but don't actually get it in the real world.. and most consumers don't realize that the MPG is not tested going up hills, sitting in traffic, wind, godzilla, bumps, and other forms of resistance. point of this being.. the manufactures want to tell you a number that you will think is really good, and the reality changes when you actually get it.. technically they are not lying to you as they have produced those numbers.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 03:56 PM
  #19  
Jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 159
From: Bay Area
Why would you want 1080p on such a small set? Anything below 42" will not look different 720p or 1080p. I'd personally go with a quality brand since they are all competitively priced in the 26-32 size range.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #20  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Jimbo
Why would you want 1080p on such a small set? Anything below 42" will not look different 720p or 1080p. I'd personally go with a quality brand since they are all competitively priced in the 26-32 size range.
Twice the pixels is twice the pixels. When you are taking about 1080i/p sources, it definitely makes a difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Symmetrical
NorCal Classifieds
7
Jul 8, 2010 12:14 AM
BoostedB
NorCal Classifieds
12
Jan 10, 2010 02:02 PM
soundwave
Bay Area
107
Dec 8, 2009 04:47 PM
STNWrX1739
Bay Area
125
Aug 25, 2008 06:25 PM
STNWrX1739
NorCal Classifieds
3
Jul 18, 2007 09:03 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 PM.