Aftermarket Forced Induction - Turboed factory NA engines Turbo EJ25! Who said that all Subarus are created equal? Aftermarket turbochargers on factory normally-aspirated engines (factory turbo engines have their own forums).

Newbie supercharger question??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2003 | 07:41 AM
  #1  
scoobysnack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
From: NY
Newbie supercharger question??

I am concidering buying a 00 2.5 rs recently and was thinking about my options. Previously all my cars were hondas but now i think its time to leave that scene
So heres the question do they make superchargers for 2.5's and if they do are they worth getting and were would i be able to get one or would i just be better off getting the turbo kit????

TIA

-Brian
Old May 13, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
KGB's Avatar
KGB
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 99
From: Delta, BC, Canada
Car Info: 2000 Impreza 2.5RS BRP
Red face

pretty much anybody that thought about making supercharger kit for the RS is either gone and have gone making turbo kit instead.
Old May 14, 2003 | 02:32 AM
  #3  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
DNT has one on the way. Rimmer made one but they may be out of business. You can get a Ludespeed stage I kit for $2300 that gives the exact same powerband shape and the same reliability also.
Old May 15, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #4  
scoobysnack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
From: NY
thank you everyone for your help


-Brian
Old May 15, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #5  
awns729's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
im prob missing the obv but why are turbos soo much better for the 2.5 than superchargers? are they just a lot more efficient and do they have more potential for power or is it something else?
Old May 15, 2003 | 08:08 PM
  #6  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Under 5-6 psi of boost there are few differences in the performance of the car with either system. Turbos are just more common, and it's a lot easier to get more (meaning more power than initially after installed) out of a turbo system than a blower.
Old May 17, 2003 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
scoobysnack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
From: NY
also correct me if im wrong but isnt a supercharger better for rally style racing and turbos are better for drag racing??

Also inst a supercharger much easier to install than a turbo and less harsh on the engine cause it controled by belts, as a turbo controled by exhaust?

-Brian
Old May 17, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #8  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
It's all in the tuning. You can make either system behave any way you want. Same with the 'harshness.' Either one can blow a motor, and either one can work forever.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
I3eXa
Wanted
3
Apr 23, 2003 07:43 PM
Johnny Rocks
Engine Management
14
Apr 22, 2003 01:25 PM
hman
Bay Area
1
Apr 17, 2003 09:26 AM
Soobienoobie
Aftermarket Forced Induction - Turboed factory NA engines
7
Mar 21, 2003 09:41 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM.