Post here and I will flame you badly
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think your definition of "flaming" is a bit off.
You haven't flamed anyone, what you have shown is that you can post images with weak captions on them.
It must have stemmed from everyone refering to you and using the term "flaming".. you must have thought they were admiring your l337 intArweb skills..
sorry guy, that was not the context they were using it in
Carry on.
You haven't flamed anyone, what you have shown is that you can post images with weak captions on them.
It must have stemmed from everyone refering to you and using the term "flaming".. you must have thought they were admiring your l337 intArweb skills..
sorry guy, that was not the context they were using it in
Carry on.
#11
Originally posted by AikenStDetour
And just to make my post that much more special for you.. I was sitting on the toilet taking a huge dump while I was posting...
So now, forever.. I will associate you and huge dumps together.
Pavlovian conditioning in action
And just to make my post that much more special for you.. I was sitting on the toilet taking a huge dump while I was posting...
So now, forever.. I will associate you and huge dumps together.
Pavlovian conditioning in action
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by AikenStDetour
I think your definition of "flaming" is a bit off.
You haven't flamed anyone, what you have shown is that you can post images with weak captions on them.
It must have stemmed from everyone refering to you and using the term "flaming".. you must have thought they were admiring your l337 intArweb skills..
sorry guy, that was not the context they were using it in
Carry on.
I think your definition of "flaming" is a bit off.
You haven't flamed anyone, what you have shown is that you can post images with weak captions on them.
It must have stemmed from everyone refering to you and using the term "flaming".. you must have thought they were admiring your l337 intArweb skills..
sorry guy, that was not the context they were using it in
Carry on.