Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

You have GOT to be kidding me...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:41 AM
  #1  
sjt's Avatar
sjt
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,601
From: Outland!
Car Info: Seltos
You have GOT to be kidding me...

O.

M.

F.

G.


We are SOOOO getting 0wn3d here... when will it stop???? Someone please make it stop...

I like the gas tax got snuck in there too... slick.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...AGL07T0TR1.DTL

Those of you just getting used to those new $3 bridge tolls, hang onto your hats -- another toll increase could be just around the corner.

Expected cost overruns from construction of the Bay Bridge's new eastern span and other bridge retrofit projects have left the state Department of Transportation hundreds of millions short. One agency source predicted the figure could be in the $2 billion range.

"You didn't hear it from me . . . but the political reality is the Bay Area is going to have to raise tolls to pay for it,'' said one Bay Area transportation expert following Caltrans' troubles. "I don't know how else they can do it.''

"It's a big mess,'' concedes Jeremiah Hallisey, a member of the state Transportation Commission, which oversees Caltrans and has asked for a full financial accounting of the bridge work.

Hallisey said the commission is still awaiting a briefing from Caltrans, but he's already saying a toll hike may be among the few available alternatives.

"That's a possibility,'' Hallisey said. Just as quickly, however, he said a gas tax hike for the nine Bay Area counties was also a possibility.

Randell Iwasaki, who just stepped up in the last week as interim director of Caltrans, said his staff was scrambling to get a handle on the unfinished work and declined to put a cost estimate on it.

"The minute we find out where we stand,'' he said, "if we have to, we will go to the Legislature. We are going to do whatever it takes to do the work.''

In any event, time is running short for a solution. Friday is the deadline for Caltrans either to either accept or reject the lone bid submitted for the new Bay Bridge eastern section's soaring single-tower suspension span.

That bid, you may recall, came in at either $1.8 billion or $1.4 billion -- the cheaper price depending on whether the contractor can secure a waiver to use foreign steel.

In either case, however, the bid is at least double the $740 million that Caltrans has left in its construction kitty to pay for the job.

Deadline or no, uncertainty over how to pay for the added costs prompted Caltrans on Friday to send the contractor a letter requesting a 60-day extension on the decision.

"So we got ourself some time to finish the numbers crunching,'' Iwasaki said.

But even with a delay, no one is betting that the cost will go down.

"Not with the building boom in China buying up every bit of available steel,'' said state Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland.

And the Bay Bridge isn't Caltrans' only problem. The agency is also facing hundreds of millions of dollars in cost overruns to complete retrofitting work on the Benicia and Richmond-San Rafael bridges. The $5.1 billion that the state Legislature authorized for retrofitting the state's seven toll bridges ran out a while back.

So now it's back to Sacramento and legislators preoccupied with the budget battle. It will be up to them to come up with a new funding package before the current session ends in late August if they want to keep the Bay Bridge and other projects on track without further costly delays.

But with money in short supply, and Northern and Southern California interests in competition, few besides Perata hold out hope that anyone outside the Bay Area will end up paying for the Bay Bridge overruns.

"Los Angeles is not going to pay for it,'' says our transportation expert. "The political realities are that the Bay Area is going to have to raise tolls to pay for it.''
edited for color.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:54 AM
  #2  
1fastGC's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,804
From: Oakland/El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: Evolution VIII
Ha..this does not surprise me. It is bound to happen.. Just look at Golden Gate Bridge.. The toll is what? $5!!!

Oh, the bridge tolls in NYC is even more ridiculous.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #3  
Speed Element's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,453
From: San Jose
Car Info: Evo X, 04 STI, 335i, Fit
I'm so glad I don't have to drive to SSF everyday for work anymore.

-Soren
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
GDB-EJ20's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 291
From: Concord, CA
Car Info: Its a gross polluter : (
i hate my commute to san francisco. sike! i live there haha no bridges for me.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:01 AM
  #5  
sonic_yellow's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,011
From: Sunny San Diego
Car Info: 03' Subaru Impreza WRX - R.I.P.
Nothing is certain cept' death and taxes - stuff like this ain't gonna just end one day. Well, Socal and Norcal gas prices are pretty much the same, so I guess we'd be going back to the good ol' days
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #6  
BluBuru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 401
From: Santa Cruz Mtns
Car Info: WRB '02 WRX
Does anyone know which are the nine "bay area counties"?

As a Santa Cruzer, am I gonna have to pay gas tax for those bridge repairs?

Just Curious,
M
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:36 AM
  #7  
Zoeb2s's Avatar
I <3 White Girls
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,491
From: Danville, CA
Car Info: E92 M3, E70, F32, E21
I am still paying $2 for bridge toll accross the benicia bridge until oct/04....gotta love fastrak
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #8  
Salty's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
I don't understand why you San Franciscans get so pissed about this...

You drive to and from San Francisco on a multi-million dollar structure and expect it to pay for itself on maintenance etc?

Not to mention, CalTrans has realized that S.F. is a growing city and is taking the proper measures to expand on new projects to make the flow of traffic smoother.

If it's not a larger toll on the existing bridges to pay for the costs then you'd be complaining about another implemented cost of another sort.

Can someone educate me if the new project is just and if the toll is justified by the project(s)?
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #9  
thebankman's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,819
From: Bay Area
Car Info: subaru
actually the S.F. population has been going down a lot in the past couple years.

the project on the bay bridge is to i believe add more lanes and further seismic retrofiting. i use the bay bridge about once every two weeks for work and the current size of the bridge is not a problem at all. i think caltrans just wanted to spend some money to justify it's budget. what a crock, another gas tax as if paying the highest gas prices in the nation wasn't enough. a bridge toll hike seems like the best option if they need the money, but the best option in the beginning was to never spend money they NEVER HAD! but that's government.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #10  
kravdra's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 726
From: Sunnyvale
Car Info: '99 Impreza OBS
I think they should raise the prices a lot more, then maybe it'l reduce traffic, make ppl carpool, or actually make them realize how expensive **** like that is. If I bike to work, why should I pay for your bridge so you can commute to work? And roads should be maintained based on usage, so I think all the money for that should be from gas, raise the gas tax till it pays for roads, then all the ppl with SUVs, and who drive a ton are paying for the roads. That being said, I love driving, and can barely afford gas, but come on, get realistic
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #11  
eastbaysubaru's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,665
From: No So Co
Car Info: '00 BRP RS Sedan / '04 PSM FXT (RIP)
The new span of the Bay Bridge will not include any additional lanes. The whole reason behind the new span is that the old span wasn't earthquake safe as we saw in the last big earthquake here in '89. It would suck to have another bridge toll hike, but if the money's not there, then what the hell are they supposed to do?

-Brian
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #12  
xom's Avatar
xom
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 212
From: Santa Cruz
Car Info: 04 GTO 5.7
Originally Posted by kravdra
I think they should raise the prices a lot more, then maybe it'l reduce traffic, make ppl carpool, or actually make them realize how expensive **** like that is. If I bike to work, why should I pay for your bridge so you can commute to work? And roads should be maintained based on usage, so I think all the money for that should be from gas, raise the gas tax till it pays for roads, then all the ppl with SUVs, and who drive a ton are paying for the roads. That being said, I love driving, and can barely afford gas, but come on, get realistic
word,
that and someone should get the SUV's to quite ducking the truck tax.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
Choku Dori's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,425
From: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Car Info: Corvette Z51
At least it's not like the "one $5 toll booth every half-mile on the highway" system like in Maryland, Virginia, and elsewhere on the East Coast. Those toll roads are REAL be0tch!
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
HongKongBeef's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,330
From: http://www.winning-smiles.com
Car Info: 2016 Red WRX
i agree. those toll roads in the east truly suck. we have it good here.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #15  
pleiad7's Avatar
The Seventh Sister
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,021
From: Alameda, CA
Car Info: MY04 Forester XT
Originally Posted by BluBuru
Does anyone know which are the nine "bay area counties"?

As a Santa Cruzer, am I gonna have to pay gas tax for those bridge repairs?

Just Curious,
M
Here ya go... doesn't look like you'll have to worry!




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 AM.