So libby (under oath) testifies that "superiors" OK'd leak
#1
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Least Coast :(
Posts: 8,159
Car Info: 08 sti
So libby (under oath) testifies that "superiors" OK'd leak
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1302808.shtml
hahaha
lets hear it hella... come on man.. lets hear the excuses..
hahaha
lets hear it hella... come on man.. lets hear the excuses..
#2
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Least Coast :(
Posts: 8,159
Car Info: 08 sti
Thursday's National Journal reports that Libby will point out that the vice president and other top administration officials encouraged him to share classified information as part of a strategy to build a defense for the war.
Libby, Cheney's former chief of staff, was indicted last year on charges that he lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity and when he subsequently told reporters.
Libby, Cheney's former chief of staff, was indicted last year on charges that he lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity and when he subsequently told reporters.
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Wait just a minute! If this guy "was indicted last year on charges that he lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury," WHAT MAKES YOU THINK he's telling the truth now?
Oh, I GET IT!!! If someone defends the administration they're a liar, but if they implicate the president they are pure like snow? Ahahhahah oh I see how it is!
You know I just handed you your own *ss. Thanks for playing!
Oh, I GET IT!!! If someone defends the administration they're a liar, but if they implicate the president they are pure like snow? Ahahhahah oh I see how it is!
You know I just handed you your own *ss. Thanks for playing!
Last edited by HellaDumb; 02-09-2006 at 10:31 PM.
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Yawn hella you owned yourself and you don't even know it.
Back to the point, I'm sure you realize that once someone gets nailed for lying, everything that comes out of their mouth is not credible.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Blue-faced in a red state
Posts: 2,256
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by HellaSmart
Back to the point, I'm sure you realize that once someone gets nailed for lying, everything that comes out of their mouth is not credible.
Thanks for playing Hella! May the Force of Dumb be with you.
#10
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Posts: 2,064
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Fixed
Originally Posted by HellaSmarty
Back to the point, I'm sure you realize that once someone gets nailed for lying (unless it's George W. Bush or members of his cabinet), everything that comes out of their mouth is not credible.
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by dub2w
Excellent point. The current White House administration has lied repeatedly, and we should not trust anything that they spew henceforth.
Thanks for playing Hella! May the Force of Dumb be with you.
Thanks for playing Hella! May the Force of Dumb be with you.
Just to help you with your confusion,
A lie is:
A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.
There are accusations that Bush lied, but no proof. We KNOW things he said gave a wrong impression, but until you put him on a polygraph, you don't KNOW if the deception was known and deliberate.
But, granted, I'm using your same the same fallacious argument that liberals use against Bush to defend the administrations credibility. I think it's patriotic to extend your government the benefit of the doubt.
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
If I were a registered republican, I'd distance myself from the current admin. They don't stand for republican values and they aren't conservative. Plus they lie and cheat like crazy.
I contend that BushJr supporters are actually not republicans nor conservatives...in fact, they are social liberals who believe morals should be handed down from the gov't to the people based on Christian ideology.
This corruption ordeal is just more proof that the current admin is a corrupt mafia-like organization that has more interest in conserving their own power than making this country better for its citizens.
I contend that BushJr supporters are actually not republicans nor conservatives...in fact, they are social liberals who believe morals should be handed down from the gov't to the people based on Christian ideology.
This corruption ordeal is just more proof that the current admin is a corrupt mafia-like organization that has more interest in conserving their own power than making this country better for its citizens.
#14
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Sorry, there is no proof such as an actual conviction (i.e. Clinton) or otherwise.
Just to help you with your confusion,
A lie is:
A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.
There are accusations that Bush lied, but no proof. We KNOW things he said gave a wrong impression, but until you put him on a polygraph, you don't KNOW if the deception was known and deliberate.
But, granted, I'm using your same the same fallacious argument that liberals use against Bush to defend the administrations credibility. I think it's patriotic to extend your government the benefit of the doubt.
Just to help you with your confusion,
A lie is:
A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.
There are accusations that Bush lied, but no proof. We KNOW things he said gave a wrong impression, but until you put him on a polygraph, you don't KNOW if the deception was known and deliberate.
But, granted, I'm using your same the same fallacious argument that liberals use against Bush to defend the administrations credibility. I think it's patriotic to extend your government the benefit of the doubt.
You can't be serious. Why do you own yourself time and time again? Do you really think the WMD is the only thing Bush has lied about? If I had the time I'd show you that video of him lieing about the wiretaps even though they had already been started.
Patriotic is not giving the government the benefit of the doubt. That is being naive and close to communism.
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by MVWRX
Are you so lost that you think Clinton was convicted of something? Wow...
Oh, but that's right. You bought his book and it's not even called fiction!