Loser Gang Banger wins $2.5M, Goes back to Prison
06-18-2008, 05:27 PM
#1
iClub Silver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Participating in some Anarchy!
Posts: 15,494
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Loser Gang Banger wins $2.5M, Goes back to Prison
$2.5 million couldn't keep Anaheim gang member from his old friends
What a ****ing loser.
What a ****ing loser.
Nobody wanted Jose Luis Muņoz to fail.
The Anaheim gang member raised by a single mother had received a second chance -- or maybe it was his first -- to turn his life around when he settled a lawsuit against the city and police for $2.5 million.
In December, he was waiting for the check and paving his future with good intentions. But four months later he was back in prison for violating parole; he had been caught associating with other gang members.
When he was released from prison, Muņoz, 23, said he was eager "to do the right thing." He said he was going to move out of his gang-infested neighborhood and buy a house for his mother, who had worked two jobs while raising him.
The Anaheim gang member raised by a single mother had received a second chance -- or maybe it was his first -- to turn his life around when he settled a lawsuit against the city and police for $2.5 million.
In December, he was waiting for the check and paving his future with good intentions. But four months later he was back in prison for violating parole; he had been caught associating with other gang members.
When he was released from prison, Muņoz, 23, said he was eager "to do the right thing." He said he was going to move out of his gang-infested neighborhood and buy a house for his mother, who had worked two jobs while raising him.
06-18-2008, 11:38 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Posts: 5,686
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
06-18-2008, 11:42 PM
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mountains
Posts: 4,650
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
a) That is not "only in ****ed up america" - Quit *****ing, and do something if you have a problem. Even if "something" is just looking at the candidates official positions on the issues. Have a problem with dumb *** lawsuits? Help change it! America has problems, many problems, but America is not "****ed up". You still have the power to affect change in your government, and in your culture.
b) How are they? How does this have to do with liberal-ness? Hell, I live with/around many many "liberals" but I am sure most of them would find this to be fairly messed up.
c) What the **** does that have to do with anything? Why does that even matter? Are you that worried that an illegal immigrant is going to steal your job? Even if you are, how does that change your judgment of this guy?
(Jumps off high horse)
06-20-2008, 08:05 AM
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 1,828
Car Info: nothing
Liberalism is not about freedom. It's about control. Modern day Liberals want to have the government control much of your life, from your economics to what you think. We can't have freedom of discussion, because if you go to a liberal forum, you will get shouted down, spit at, or attacked. So much for 'give peace a chance'. Liberals are the most hypocritical people in the world. It's fine for them to attack a conservative because they are being provoked. Apparently, they lose control of all their bodily functions when presented with an independent thought. Anyone who says that modern-day liberalism is about freedom of choice, freedom of thought, freedom of anything is reading it out of a book and not living in the real world. Look around you. Experience life, and then tell me that liberals want you to have freedom.
06-21-2008, 01:34 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 51
Car Info: 1999 Subaru Impreza L Wagon
Liberalism is not about freedom. It's about control. Modern day Liberals want to have the government control much of your life, from your economics to what you think. We can't have freedom of discussion, because if you go to a liberal forum, you will get shouted down, spit at, or attacked. So much for 'give peace a chance'. Liberals are the most hypocritical people in the world. It's fine for them to attack a conservative because they are being provoked. Apparently, they lose control of all their bodily functions when presented with an independent thought. Anyone who says that modern-day liberalism is about freedom of choice, freedom of thought, freedom of anything is reading it out of a book and not living in the real world. Look around you. Experience life, and then tell me that liberals want you to have freedom.
to be honest...but don't quote me on this...last time i remember..anyone with half a brain...thought for themselves..and didn't use a political party affiliation...both liberals and conservatives are ****ed up but you know what? It doesn't seem to be working the conservative way..in fact...it's kinda throwing us into the crapper i mean..if we are worse off than canada..you know somthings wrong here
06-22-2008, 10:21 PM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mountains
Posts: 4,650
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
Liberalism is not about freedom. It's about control. Modern day Liberals want to have the government control much of your life, from your economics to what you think. We can't have freedom of discussion, because if you go to a liberal forum, you will get shouted down, spit at, or attacked. So much for 'give peace a chance'. Liberals are the most hypocritical people in the world. It's fine for them to attack a conservative because they are being provoked. Apparently, they lose control of all their bodily functions when presented with an independent thought. Anyone who says that modern-day liberalism is about freedom of choice, freedom of thought, freedom of anything is reading it out of a book and not living in the real world. Look around you. Experience life, and then tell me that liberals want you to have freedom.
06-23-2008, 12:04 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Posts: 5,686
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
06-23-2008, 12:18 PM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 185
Car Info: 2008 STi OBP
It's so easy to bash something you don't understand - people that actually embrace equal rights for their fellow man, common treatment under the law and at least attempt to end our dependence on fossil fuels. Yeah, those guys are huge crackheads.
06-23-2008, 12:30 PM
#14
iClub Silver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Participating in some Anarchy!
Posts: 15,494
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Dude, turn off the Limbaugh and stop blaming everyone you don't like for your (perceived) problems. Last time I checked, it wasn't 'liberals' that started an illegal war, currently costing our country trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. It's not liberals that have dismantled the checks and balances system put forth in the Federalist Papers and US Constitution. It's not liberals that favor the wealth of corporations and tax breaks for the rich over the middle class. It's not liberals that are all for tax breaks to the oil industry while blocking tax breaks for renewable energy projects in Congress.
It's so easy to bash something you don't understand - people that actually embrace equal rights for their fellow man, common treatment under the law and at least attempt to end our dependence on fossil fuels. Yeah, those guys are huge crackheads.
It's so easy to bash something you don't understand - people that actually embrace equal rights for their fellow man, common treatment under the law and at least attempt to end our dependence on fossil fuels. Yeah, those guys are huge crackheads.
06-23-2008, 01:12 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Posts: 5,686
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
How was WWII illegally started?
It doesn't change the point of what he just wrote.
It doesn't change the point of what he just wrote.
PROCEEDINGS IN THE SENATE
MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1941
DECLARATION OF STATE OF WAR WITH JAPAN
The Senate having returned to its chamber (at 12 o'clock and 47 minutes
p. m.), it reassembled and the Vice President resumed the chair.
Mr. BARKLEY. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk
called the roll.
* * * * * *
The VICE PRESIDENT. Eighty-two Senators have answered to their
names. A quorum is present.
Mr. CONNALLY. Mr. President, I introduce a joint resolution, and ask for
its immediate consideration without reference to a committee.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The joint resolution will be read.
The joint resolution (S. J. Res. 116) declaring that a state of war
exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and
the people of the United States, and making provision to prosecute the
same, was read the first time by its title, and the second time at
length, as follows:
"Whereas the Imperial Government of Japan has committed unprovoked acts
of war against the Government and the people of the United states of
America:
"Therefore be it
"Resolved, etc., That the state of war between the United states and the
Imperial Government of Japan which has thus been thrust upon the United
States is hereby formally declared; and the President is hereby
authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces
of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war
against the Imperial Government of Japan; and to bring the conflict to a
successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby
pledged by the Congress of the United states."
* * * * * *
After debate.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The joint resolution having been read three times
the question is, Shall it pass?
On that question the yeas and nays have been demanded and ordered. The
clerk will call the roll.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to call the roll.
* * * * * *
The result was announced: Yeas 82, nays, 0.
So the joint resolution was passed.
MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1941
DECLARATION OF STATE OF WAR WITH JAPAN
The Senate having returned to its chamber (at 12 o'clock and 47 minutes
p. m.), it reassembled and the Vice President resumed the chair.
Mr. BARKLEY. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk
called the roll.
* * * * * *
The VICE PRESIDENT. Eighty-two Senators have answered to their
names. A quorum is present.
Mr. CONNALLY. Mr. President, I introduce a joint resolution, and ask for
its immediate consideration without reference to a committee.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The joint resolution will be read.
The joint resolution (S. J. Res. 116) declaring that a state of war
exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and
the people of the United States, and making provision to prosecute the
same, was read the first time by its title, and the second time at
length, as follows:
"Whereas the Imperial Government of Japan has committed unprovoked acts
of war against the Government and the people of the United states of
America:
"Therefore be it
"Resolved, etc., That the state of war between the United states and the
Imperial Government of Japan which has thus been thrust upon the United
States is hereby formally declared; and the President is hereby
authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces
of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war
against the Imperial Government of Japan; and to bring the conflict to a
successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby
pledged by the Congress of the United states."
* * * * * *
After debate.
The VICE PRESIDENT. The joint resolution having been read three times
the question is, Shall it pass?
On that question the yeas and nays have been demanded and ordered. The
clerk will call the roll.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to call the roll.
* * * * * *
The result was announced: Yeas 82, nays, 0.
So the joint resolution was passed.