http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...src=rss&rpc=22

Here's the 20:

1. Rudy Guliani
2. Barack Obama
3. John McCain
4. Condoleezza Rice
5. Bill Clinton
6. Joseph Lieberman
7. Michael Bloomberg
8. John Edwards
9. Hilary Clinton
10. Bill Richardson
11. Joseph Biden
12. Nancy Pelosi
13. Mitt Romney
14. Al Gore
15. G.W. Bush
16. Evan Bayh
17. Newt Gingrich
18. Bill Frist
19. Harry Reid
20. John Kerry

 

Few, hopefully he'll finally get the idea that nobody likes him.

 

Wow, hes hated more than Hillary, Global Warming Gore, and Dubya?! That takes alot to be hated more than those three.

 

i really would like to see mccain run again....

 

please god let her stay there

 

+1 FTW

 

I'd vote for Rudy.

 

haven't done much research on him have you?

 

Bush is an idiot. He shouldn't even be in the top 20 out of 20

 

Uh uh.

I've never voted, neither.

 

hesa conservative that is prochoice.

*headexplodes*

 

Then you know about his past and all those scandals. His lack of respect for free speech, his illegal immigrant policies, and other things that no Republican or Democrat will vote for. He has no shot in hell and is just riding his success of 9/11 as far as he can. Not that I can blame him but he has no shot in hell.

But you knew all this already.

 

Has he smoked crack with a hooker?

 

Tell that to the 62,000,000 people that voted for him in 2004. Seriously. Let’s not forget the views of the majority of this country. Just look at the list... he’s still 5 spots above Kerry even after the crummy job he’s done. Lists like this solidify (not prove) my theories that Republicans got the boot out of congress because they weren't doing their job at the level voters wanted them. Most voters still had the same political views as they did in the last six years. I think it had little to do with scandals like that with Foley. This is why Dems need to be careful and better perform better in congress or else they'll be unemployed so fast it'll make their head spin.

 

I've spoken to A LOT of people (and a lot of old timers) that lived in NY when Guliani was major. And despite a couple bumps in the road (laying off city workers when the workers just weren't listening to him and some might say education) they always say NYC was worse or far worse under Koch, Dinkins, Beame, Lindsay or Wagner. Street crime that was busting at the seams (mainly in the upper west side) with Dinkins almost completely vanished on the scummiest streets with Guliani. I like to think of Guliani as the Arnold equivalent... not perfect (what politician or human being is?) but really a stand-up politician that's done a lot of good. Seems that poor opinions of Guliani come from a small percentage in NYC and largely from people that never lived in NYC.

Of course, given the fact Guliani is pro-choice, Republicans will shoot themselves in the foot by nominating a total right-winger that cannot win in 2008. Then again, he's anti-2nd amendment too... but I doubt he'd ever bring that into national politics.