Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Of course this comes out after Nov. 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #32  
deyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You obviously forget that WE kicked them out.
We didn't kick out any inspectors, although they were probably advised to leave before the fighting started.

Originally Posted by Unregistered
And your point that we are enforcing UN resolution is laughable at best, if we head down that thought pattern of yours we should be attacking Israel next.
What the hell are you talking about? Thought pattern?

Originally Posted by Unregistered
The UN didn't back us because we didn't SHOW valid proof to attack. Obviously they where RIGHT and WE where wrong. Or do you so blindly forget that no WMD where found, no connection to Bin Laden was found, what else do you wanna hear!?
As I said above.

Originally Posted by deyes
They were prevented from coming to the conclusion that there were no WMD. Thank you Sadam.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #33  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
I can't believe this discussion is still going on. People are going to believe what they want to believe. I'm tired of arguing, so F it. "We're" always good, "they're" always bad. Never mind facts.
I think I'm with Bruce Lee from now on, let's just nuke the whole f'ing planet and let the few who survive try to sort things out.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #34  
EricDaRed81's Avatar
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Originally Posted by Wthermans
So it's ok that the UN Inspectors couldn't inspect where they pleased and (not knowing what we know now) run the risk of taking Saddam's (a man who has a history of using WMDs on his own people and despises the US and free world as a whole) word of dismantlement (that he failed to provide proof for)? Sorry, I personally feel that is an unacceptable risk at the time.
Thanks Mr. Bush.... great party line

The weapon inspectors said there were no WMD's. Not just Saddam.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #36  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by deyes
What the hell are you talking about? Thought pattern?
Go read up on how many resolutions Israel has listened too.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #37  
EricDaRed81's Avatar
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Originally Posted by Wthermans
Are you failing to realize that the weapon inspectors were not allowed EVERYWHERE they wanted to inspect? I really fail to see what's so hard to understand about that.
And what you fail to realize is that the great WMD threat wasn't actually why Bush went into Iraq. He just used that to make us follow like mules.

The real reason was to put out Saddam regardless of the weapons.

Thats why on March, 17 2003 he said either Saddam must leave the country or be invaded. And 2 days later war begins.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #38  
deyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Go read up on how many resolutions Israel has listened too.
A country besieged by terrorists, not listening to resolutions preventing them from protecting themselves against said terrorists! You don't say!?
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #39  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Originally Posted by deyes
A country besieged by terrorists, not listening to resolutions preventing them from protecting themselves against said terrorists! You don't say!?
Israeli terrorists using US weapons, Palestinian terrorists using what's left of Soviet weapons, it doesn't matter because it's still "them" and "we" are better. Nuke them all. Why not? Let it rip...
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #40  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by deyes
A country besieged by terrorists, not listening to resolutions preventing them from protecting themselves against said terrorists! You don't say!?

Again you don't know anything about the subject? Israel uses terrorism too, the big difference they use jets and tanks. While Palestinian are blowing themselves up. And not ALL the UN resolutions that they don't listen to are about "terrorist". Go read up on the conflict both parties are at fault. So what now?
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 10:00 AM
  #41  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Israel uses terrorism too, the big difference they use jets and tanks.
Given to them by the United States of America. If the PLO hadn't resorted to terrorism decades ago, I believe the world would be a much different place right now. Both sides are to blame, but neither will admit they have made mistakes and neither are willing to compromise. Kind of like our current administration.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
i<3dirt
Sacramento & Reno
5
Oct 20, 2014 10:26 AM
DetailAddict
Suby Shopping & Maintenance/Warranty
13
Aug 16, 2006 05:10 PM
supertek75
Bay Area
61
Apr 6, 2006 07:41 AM
Paisan
Tri-State
0
Sep 14, 2004 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:42 PM.