Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Anti-Abortion Logic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #121  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by muddar
If it is arrogance to think that "religions- all religions- value life, protect life, and don't allow anything that might endanger life", then I will say "OK… I might be arrogant!).
Yes you are if you believe that since not all religions are MAIN stream. And thats what you are missing here.

Originally Posted by muddar
Hye… why don't you be specific, and tell about “YOUR FRIEND’S RELIGION”, and tell what does it really tell about Abortion?!!!!!
The name of the religion, and what does it tell about abortion? (HOW does it justify abortion?)
He is in some satanic religion last I talked to him. (What don't tell me you never heard of satanic religions? Or do you not concider that religion?) He switches around a lot but one of the ones he was in allowed abortions. It's justified by looking at it as a bunch of cells not a human being. Or in other words in a scientific manner! Shocker there!

Originally Posted by muddar
Of course , why would you?!!!!- Since it goes against your believes!!!!!!!!!!!!
Um no. You made that statement hence its your issue to prove right not mine. Pluss I don't want to do the research for you. Since maybe you'll learn something along the way. And for you to tell me I would deny things because it goes against my beliefs is hypocrisy at its worst.

Originally Posted by muddar
Are you used to throw out accusations like those so frequently?! –while you honestly seem to have very deformed perspectives over religions!

And although I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t like it, but religions were not sent to fulfill an “INDIVIDUAL” spiritual thirst only! There were sent to organize the SOCIETY as a whole too. People shouldn’t assist constitutions to make religions shrink into that “INDIVIDUAL” pathetic shape –especially when those "constitutions" prove as much failure as they have proven up till now; dealing with issue like abortion.
Yes your religion could be to shape society. But society as a whole in this MODERN era does not have to take the shape of YOUR religion. And thats whats GREAT about our constitution. Our constitution protects EVERYONES right to have their OWN beliefs and their OWN morals. As long as they don't hurt others they are fine. And, I believe our constitution is doing an AWESOME job protecting people to have a choice whether to have a abortion or not. Maybe instead of saying the constitution is failing us, you should look inside yourself first and see why you fail.

Originally Posted by muddar
“Nothing can be exact about a pregrnancy”… They can give… “estimates”…. of the… “exact”… “week”… it will happen. But …“MANY things”… can and do change inbetween that time period. So …….”yyyyyeeeeesss”…. we have…. “mastered”…. the art of child bearing ………“pretty damn well”……….. “But of course its not 100% exact.”

Those lines were really really, honestly, frankly, the most confused set of words I ever ever ever read.
What you can't read simple english? Or just don't want to admit that when dealing with humans nothing can be 100% sure for everyone since, heres the big shocker, everyone has a different body than the rest! Hence while something might be true for one person something may change and no longer hold true! This isn't rocket science.


Originally Posted by muddar
A real vivid mixture of “religion, traditions and laws” can make every one happy –even nonbelievers!
WRONG. Dead wrong. I'll give you one example off the top of my head. GAYS would hate it. Yep im sure gays would love living in your world. Or better yet "non-believers" that believe in pre-martial sex, abortions, drinking, smoking, and the list goes on and on. How could you even say such a comment like this? What drug are you on seriously?

Originally Posted by muddar
No religion forces itself on other religions –it’s either you believe or you don’t. this is one basic natural feature of all religions, as long as people –no matter what they believe in, or don’t believe in- are treating there lives naturally.
I figured it out you're on crack! You have to be, jesus christ almighty, go pick up a history book and then come back to me that religion doesn't force itself on other religions. Thats just pathetic!

Originally Posted by muddar
Due to the social responsibility of a religion towards the society it lives in, it should intervene when people start treating life “unnaturally” by legislating killing; and it should do so for those people’s own sake. Because after all, to live with the feeling that you were somehow suppressed(deprived from a “right” for example), is better than to live with the feeling that you’ve killed someone. And, no matter what people –like abortionists- try to do to convince themselves that “OK… it’s not killing” it will live with them -at least it will make them live in a dilemma for the rest of there lives (it was killing…. It was not….no … it was … no.. not). And people like you, and instead of helping those women face the fact that it was killing, and help them to lives with it, they try to cozy the whole thing up for them.
What a bunch of a assumptions you are making here. I know several girls that had abortions and I DATED one that had one. And none of them are living with that "dilemma". Its pretty simple actually it wasn't a kid yet it was a bunch of cells. And get this several of those girls are atheist and then some are even CHRISTIANS! And all from last I heard are doing very well. How many woman do you know that have had abortions?

Originally Posted by muddar
Such a dilemma will, most probably, help either demolishing those women lives, or will help turning them into evil-people, who will consider no deterrent to do more extreme unnatural things within their lives. Those women have not thought it out right, and they might have been bewildered by people like you maybe, but when abortion is not legislated at all then, at least, they will feel how serious it is, before they make up their minds!
Wait I was wrong you're not on crack your on L.S.D. Where do you come up with this stuff? Who feeds you this bull****? What religion are you? None of the girls I know are "evil-people". One is married and raising a family and has a daughter. Another is in med school right now going to be a doctor soon. Another is getting a Masters in one of the best schools in the nation. Another is a nurse, and we all know nurses are "evil-people". And I could go on. You need to open up your mind and your eyes. Someone is lying to you about the world. Seriously, I pitty you. Also if you think people shouldn't have abortions I suggest you start adopting every child that was not aborted but the mother couldn't support it, in your city. Why not put your money where your mouth is. So sad to see that people like you are still alive, in a country that is so educated.
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #122  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Originally Posted by Unregistered
So sad to see that people like you are still alive, in a country that is so educated.

That's the sad part, we're not that educated anymore. And we have some conservatives saying all college is good for is to brainwash good people into being liberal. And some religious people saying that the future is irrelevent because the rapture is coming. And they use these viewpoints to vote for policy. So my guess is that our education system will get much worse before it gets any better.
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #123  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by MVWRX
That's the sad part, we're not that educated anymore. And we have some conservatives saying all college is good for is to brainwash good people into being liberal. And some religious people saying that the future is irrelevent because the rapture is coming. And they use these viewpoints to vote for policy. So my guess is that our education system will get much worse before it gets any better.
Amen to that brother!

[sarcasm]I can't see how with all the money we spend on education in this country![/sarcasm]
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #124  
HellaDumb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
never mind
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #125  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
After re-reading this whole thread (yeah, it took me a while), I've concluded that there is no such thing as anti-abortion logic. Only anti-abortion feelings, sentiments, and 'reasons' for being anti-abortion that have to do with a higher power. Logic, no matter who is using it, says that abortions make sense in some circumstances and therefore they should be optional for everybody. If you are one who disagrees with abortions on a spiritual or emotional level, don't have one. There, now everyone should be happy.
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #126  
HellaDumb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by MVWRX
After re-reading this whole thread (yeah, it took me a while), I've concluded that there is no such thing as anti-abortion logic. Only anti-abortion feelings, sentiments, and 'reasons' for being anti-abortion that have to do with a higher power. Logic, no matter who is using it, says that abortions make sense in some circumstances and therefore they should be optional for everybody. If you are one who disagrees with abortions on a spiritual or emotional level, don't have one. There, now everyone should be happy.

Man, what planet are you on? Substitute the word "murder" for "abortion" throughout your paragraph, and the same non-sensical, moronic conclusion still holds! Brilliant!

Tell me you posted that after coming home from the bars or something...
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 10:11 PM
  #127  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
Murder does not equal abortion....
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #128  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
There are a lot of logical reasons to not murder that don't have to do with a higher power. The only reasons anyone has brought up against abortion have to do with a higher power.
If murder=abortion, and murder is always wrong, then how can war be justified by a religious person. It can't. But religious people support wars anyway. If abortion is always wrong, wars are always wrong. Since it is clear that wars are not always wrong, then abortions are not always wrong either.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #129  
HellaDumb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by MVWRX
The only reasons anyone has brought up against abortion have to do with a higher power. If murder=abortion, and murder is always wrong, then how can war be justified by a religious person. It can't. If abortion is always wrong, wars are always wrong.
Well, I think you make a compelling argument proving that anti-war, pro-abortionists are two-faced flip-floppers. Well stated.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #130  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Well, I think you make a compelling argument proving that anti-war, pro-abortionists are two-faced flip-floppers. Well stated.

Anti-abortion, pro-warists are much moreso. That's my argument. But you are correct, both sides are completely hypocritical when it comes to the issue of justifying murder.

The pertinant argument, however, is this. Wars will happen, and most of them will be justified in the minds of those involved. That means that people are justifying murder for political/nationalistic gain. That means that even if you believe abortions are murder(which many people don't), there are times when murder is justified. If there are times when murder is justified, then abortions can be justified by the same people who justify war. So if you believe that there are good reasons to go to war, then you are hypcritical and blind if you simultaniously believe that there is never a good reason for an abortion.

Last edited by MVWRX; Apr 25, 2005 at 01:44 PM.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #131  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
What I love is bush being a pro-lifer but frying every single person he could during his governorship in Texas. Even a mentally challenged individual, just off.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #132  
FUNKED1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,152
I love it too. The life of an innocent child is worth a lot more than that of a murderer, mentally challenged or not.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 10:48 PM
  #133  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
How do you put certain value on life for one individuals against anothers?
Old May 5, 2005 | 03:26 AM
  #134  
muddar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by Imprezastifan88
The embryo in the 1st trimester is only a bundle of undeveloped cells: most the time when a abortion is performed, they have not specalized into anything at all (arms, legs, w/e).
life has different stages. Not having (arms, legs, …. Etc), is an idea that can easily be diminished when we all recalled that we’re going to decay into dust, in a different kind of “life” –here, not diminishing the idea that BOTH of them are life-stages. Life-aspects are not the same throughout one’s –so called – life; they vary a lot; one might not lose an arm, but he\she loses nervous cells all the time, women lose their fertility by time, and ones’ mental activity is not the same all the time throughout ones’ life. So, due to the “LOGIC” I experienced it this forum, I think, “logically” the “constitutional” range of rights should vary in parallel! –shouldn’t it!!
Old May 5, 2005 | 03:32 AM
  #135  
muddar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by MVWRX
Do you believe war can be justified? Because if you do, then the argument that the fetus is alive is irrelevent. Why can you justify killing sometimes (for political/national gain) but not when it is on a personal level and has the potential to do more good than a war? The hypocrisy that is inherent in religion makes your argument against abortion unintelligible.

Two different things!- abortion, and war. War\killing can be justified when the “other side” behaves in a manner, that is harmful to a country’s land, or ones’ life. Abortion is not the same; you simply don’t have enough “prosecution” against that fetus to justify killing it –“constitutionally” speaking!

Have you ever been a practicing religious individual through your life-time so far?! –you see, this is the only notion, for me, that would make me think of you as “eligible” to claim that there is hypocrisy inherited in, only, the religion that you’re practicing. Otherwise, you’re not eligible for such a claimer!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 PM.