Stereo & Security Sound systems, alarms, and radar detectors.

looking for good cheap receiver...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #1  
DetailAddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,912
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: Evo X
looking for good cheap receiver...

I was browsing crutchfield.com and found these two. I looked up Alpine because seems like most people here prefer Alpine. I found the Pioneer because that is the top seller. Both of them are $150 and it's the price range I am looking at. I am not a big 'sound' guy. I want to get one because the one in my car is going 'bye bye'. That damn thing could take up to 20 minutes before it start playing the CD. It's just sad. My commute is only 15 minutes. So what do you guys think? Let me know, thanks!

Pioneer DEH-P3700MP CD/MP3/WWA Receiver
Get $30 Mail-in Rebate with a Pioneer SIRIUS package!
MP3, WMA, and CD-R/W playback • detachable face • 22 watts RMS x 4 • Supertuner IIID • XM & SIRIUS Satellite Radio-ready • Easy EQ • remote • changer control

Alpine CDE-9843 CD/MP3 Receiver
MP3 & CD-R/W playback • detachable face • 16 watts RMS x 4 (CEA-compliant) • Bass Engine • preamp outputs
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #2  
DetailAddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,912
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: Evo X
so I did a comparison provided by crutchfield. Seems like the Pioneer unit is a better pick.

Pioneer vs Alpine
RMS Power Output 22 watts vs 16 watts
Peak Output 50 watts vs 45 watts
Preamp Voltage 2.2 volts vs 2.0 volts
Preamp Outputs 2 pairs vs 1 pair
EQ Bands 3 vs none
Wireless Remote Yes vs No
Changer Control Yes vs No
FM Sensitivity 8 dBf vs 9.3 dBf
FM Presets 18 vs 12
WMA Playback Yes vs No

Alpine vs Pioneer
RMS Power Bandwidth 20-20kHz vs 50-15kHz
European Tuning Yes vs No
CD Signal-to-Noise 105 dB vs 94 dB

So between the two, I guess Pioneer is the better pick. But do you guys have some better suggestions for that price ($150) range? Also, this unit (Pioneer) is not one of those that would break after 2 weeks of use right? The reviews seems to bee pretty good on the Pioneer as well. Thanks!
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #3  
DetailAddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,912
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: Evo X
so no one?
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #4  
laoba's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,136
From: <3 tai mei
Car Info: rx8
Do you plan on upgrading your speakers?
if not, i'd go with the pioneer. even with the cheaper units, pioneer decks sound really good with stock set ups. when you get to the 400$+ units, alpine sound quality tends to shine, though pioneer premier units are also on par.
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
DetailAddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,912
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: Evo X
no speakers upgrade. Just something good receiver that plays different format and won't break down on me.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thebankman
Bay Area
1
Jan 5, 2004 06:19 PM
Poe Wytrash
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
7
Dec 1, 2003 11:26 AM
Hank3
For Sale by Members
3
Sep 9, 2003 06:37 AM
jahkesh
For Sale by Members
0
Apr 17, 2003 02:41 PM
BeavisNuke
For Sale by Members
1
Mar 25, 2003 06:07 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:36 PM.