Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

I-Speed USA presents Ion Vs FP dyno plots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2003 | 01:15 AM
  #4  
240sxer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 513
From: southern california
Car Info: 98 L w/hybrid ej257 Linked
the FP let you guys run a 13.1 then the new turbo let you guys get a 13.3 w/ more power i do hope it does get better. anyways keep everyone updated

Last edited by 240sxer; Mar 8, 2003 at 01:18 AM.
Old Mar 8, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #6  
teiva-boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,780
From: San Diego
Car Info: Boosted Geo Prizm
Originally posted by christoph1371
The 1/4 times are relative to lots of other things besides the turbo. There is weather, R/T, 60ft, wind etc...

With the FP we had for 6months or so. That 13.1 was the best time we ever got during that time.
With the Ion, installed only for four days, the time we got , so far, was 13.3.

Remember the drag strip doesn't represent real life. It can tell you how good parts are. However, it really represents how good the driver is.
Chris

Well said.

So you do you have ECUTEK maps yet for the iON? Kinda similar to a vishnu stage 2 but using an iON turbo instead?
Old Mar 8, 2003 | 07:01 PM
  #7  
CLsmooth71's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
Sounds Sweet!!

Originally posted by christoph1371
....Remember the drag strip doesn't represent real life. It can tell you how good parts are. However, it really represents how good the driver is.
Chris
Hey Chris,

The ION turbo sounds like a really sweet turbo for daily-driven cars. I hope it works out for you guys!

Btw, I'm not a technical-whiz, but while driver ability serves a primary role in getting good 1/4 mile times (ET's), aren't trap speeds good indicators of the performance potential & effectiveness of a car's set-up? As long as a driver doesn't bog like crazy off the line or light up the tires halfway down the track, a semi-clean run will net just about the same trap speed as a "perfect" run, right?

What were Adam's traps w/the new, ION turbo? Any higher than the 13.1 @ 104mph run w/the FP turbo?

CL

Last edited by CLsmooth71; Mar 8, 2003 at 07:03 PM.
Old Mar 8, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #8  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
There is another modded TD04 floating around right now that I'm fairly sure will outperform both the ion and FP turbos. It is being offered by amelnikov and consists of a 16G cold side, 360 degree trust bearing, larger exhaust wheel in a bored out housing, and a 12 month / 12000 mile warrantee. This turbo flows 505 cfm at 1 bar while the VF30/34 only flows 430. Also, this turbo makes 16 PSI by 2650 RPM so it spools several hundred RPM faster than the VF30 as well.

So Chris it looks like you guys are going to have to buy one and test it out. I would do it if I had the money, but alas I am not rich. Yet. Oh and will someone post the flow numbers for the FP and ion turbos and possibly when they reach 16 PSI so that we can see what the spool RPMs look like between these turbo. That way we can have an objective look at how these babies stack up. Screw IHI, this turbo in particular looks like it beats the crap out of the IHIs. Plus I would rather walk down the unbeaten path than use some other turbo that everyone and their mother has and already know where my ceiling is. I make my own ceilings.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 03:53 AM
  #9  
240sxer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 513
From: southern california
Car Info: 98 L w/hybrid ej257 Linked
which does everyone recommand.. goin with a JDM ej, us ej or a RS turbo... i for one think one of the ej's would be better but the more and more i read about RS turbos and the more people tell me about them i lean more and more toward it. but i am still concered about the tranny and engine failure at higher HP and longer use// over a period of time.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by 240sxer
which does everyone recommand.. goin with a JDM ej, us ej or a RS turbo... i for one think one of the ej's would be better but the more and more i read about RS turbos and the more people tell me about them i lean more and more toward it. but i am still concered about the tranny and engine failure at higher HP and longer use// over a period of time.
Well, the RS internals are not meant to have the excess stress of a turbo placed on them. They can only handle about 9 PSI safely and a lot of RS-Ts run 5 PSI. The USDM EJ20 has an open deck block meaning that the tops of the cylinder sleeves are left floating and unsupported. I doubt one could run any more than 300 WHP on the USDM block without serious risk of engine failure due to the flexing of the cylinder sleeves. The JDM EJ207 block is has a semi-closed deck which means that it has two extra support beams cast into each cylinder wall to help prevent them from flexing. Although I haven't heard of many EJ207s here in the states, I would bet that one could safely push 400 WHP with one of those blocks. Now that is some serious power. If you still don't understand what I'm talking about check out this thread.
Old Mar 11, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #13  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by christoph1371
True. The USDM EJ20 can handle loads of power. The problem has been with people abusing the trannies, improper component combinations and poor to little ECM.

There is, in the works, another TD04 aimed directly to compete with the VF30. We will see what happens

Chris
chris what do you think about the modded td04 i mentioned above? in my opinion, it sounds very nice. i would try one if i had the cheese.
Old Mar 11, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #15  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
I thought I posted some specs of the turbo, but I'll just post the email I got from Alex Melnikov.

Hi. A while back you expressed interest in the group purchace I was organizing for a stock turbo upgrade. This was for a 16G cold side, 360 degree trust bearing and larger exhaust wheel in bored out housing (not a measly clip that hurts more then helps).
All this with 12 months/ 12 mile warranty. Just for reference this turbo spools several hundered rpm sooner then VF30 and VF34 (16 psi by 2650 rpm) and flows more ( VF30/34 430 cfm at 1 bar, this turbo 505 cfm at 1 bar). I am finally ready to set the wheels in motion and just wanted to make sure that I contact everybody that was interested. The final price is $750 with your turbo shipped to modify or a brand new modified turbo for $1170.
Please let me know if you would like to participate.
My email is alex@alexmelnikov.com

I really think this turbo sounds great on paper. Alex has already posted some dyno plots of some preliminary runs that iirc do not include EMC or injectors or fuel pupm. It was on one of the dynos that gives high numbers, mustang or dynapack, but the numbers and plots still looked very promising. I'll see if I can find the link to the dyno plots.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 AM.