SRIC Pride & various other derails
#151
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 842
Car Info: '94 SVX, '02 WRX
Originally Posted by Aaron@S-S
I think we need to work active weight transfer into the pace note for the S
and an Oh nos!! might be appropriate for the jump
and an Oh nos!! might be appropriate for the jump
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
#153
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by Aaron@S-S
I think we need to work active weight transfer into the pace note for the S
Originally Posted by Aaron@S-S
and an Oh nos!! might be appropriate for the jump
And I think maybe a handwriting font might look cooler on the pace notes, authenticity aside.
#154
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by sperry
Now we're getting somewhere! lol
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
#155
Originally Posted by sperry
Now we're getting somewhere! lol
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
agreed entirely, I really like the "active weight transfer" comment, not sure how it would fit in..
How about a "snow donkey" reference
Oh noes is always good/
#157
Warm Fuzzy Admin
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13,799
Car Info: 97 LOB, 05 FXT, 03 Tundra
How about black lower grill cutout, windshield cutout, and SRIC/"notes" in the windshield?
Or is it better from an applique persective to have a large block with cutouts than smaller elements?
Or is it better from an applique persective to have a large block with cutouts than smaller elements?
#158
Originally Posted by sperry
Now we're getting somewhere! lol
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
How about the rally style shorthand notes vs. the longer notes in the ()'s? Keep 'em both? Ditch the shorthand? I wanted the notes to look realistic, but I also wanted them to be understanable to the common person. Comments?
#160
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 842
Car Info: '94 SVX, '02 WRX
Originally Posted by Aaron@S-S
How about black lower grill cutout, windshield cutout, and SRIC/"notes" in the windshield?
Or is it better from an applique persective to have a large block with cutouts than smaller elements?
Or is it better from an applique persective to have a large block with cutouts than smaller elements?
#165
Originally Posted by sperry
The resolution of the screening process is incredible... you don't really have to worry too much about things like that.
I like the car logo as is...all the other logos already have the grill headlight cut outs, I like the variation on this one.
How about Navy shirts with yellow ink