oh hey.. its Monday (NWS T-will chicks up in HURRR)
#256
Originally Posted by jvick125
No offense to either of you (Scott and John), but I honestly can't believe that people would think and/or believe that our OWN Government would actually attack innocent people on our OWN soil. It baffles me.
#257
Originally Posted by Mr. Xevious
I don't think so.. but I want better explinations for what happened to the pentagon other then "yeah, a plane hit it" when the evidence does not support that.
like I said, I am one of the last people that will scream conspiracy.. but some of the evidence is kinda hard to refute
like I said, I am one of the last people that will scream conspiracy.. but some of the evidence is kinda hard to refute
And as far as those new videos are concerned, you can see the plane fly into the building. Granted it takes a couple times to notice it. You also have to think at what rate the film is going, and how fast the plane is moving. If they could really trigger some denators to go off THAT simultaneously, wow. I'm highly impressed.
#259
BanHammer™
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Posts: 47,585
Car Info: 2001 Forester RS2 SPEC-F
Originally Posted by nKoan
See: JFK, Pearl Harbor
Pearl Harbor?
its possible.. My minor was in history and I did a lot of coursework over WWII. There was a lot of evidence that Perl Harbor was used to rally the US behind the president to get into the conflict.
Previous to that, the US was in a state of isolationism; the popular consensus was that no one cared because it was happening half way around the world.
Ever wonder why all the US carriers were not in Perl Harbor but all 5 were out at sea ?
The only ships left in Perl Harbor were the weakest of the Pacific fleet.
so.. with that said.. Anyone need some tinfoil.. I have extra
#263
Originally Posted by Mr. Xevious
We all know that JFK was a conspiracy. The evidence is just too great.
Pearl Harbor?
its possible.. My minor was in history and I did a lot of coursework over WWII. There was a lot of evidence that Perl Harbor was used to rally the US behind the president to get into the conflict.
Previous to that, the US was in a state of isolationism; the popular consensus was that no one cared because it was happening half way around the world.
Ever wonder why all the US carriers were not in Perl Harbor but all 5 were out at sea ?
The only ships left in Perl Harbor were the weakest of the Pacific fleet.
so.. with that said.. Anyone need some tinfoil.. I have extra
Pearl Harbor?
its possible.. My minor was in history and I did a lot of coursework over WWII. There was a lot of evidence that Perl Harbor was used to rally the US behind the president to get into the conflict.
Previous to that, the US was in a state of isolationism; the popular consensus was that no one cared because it was happening half way around the world.
Ever wonder why all the US carriers were not in Perl Harbor but all 5 were out at sea ?
The only ships left in Perl Harbor were the weakest of the Pacific fleet.
so.. with that said.. Anyone need some tinfoil.. I have extra
#264
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 52,306
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by Mr. Xevious
We all know that JFK was a conspiracy. The evidence is just too great.
Pearl Harbor?
its possible.. My minor was in history and I did a lot of coursework over WWII. There was a lot of evidence that Perl Harbor was used to rally the US behind the president to get into the conflict.
Previous to that, the US was in a state of isolationism; the popular consensus was that no one cared because it was happening half way around the world.
Ever wonder why all the US carriers were not in Perl Harbor but all 5 were out at sea ?
The only ships left in Perl Harbor were the weakest of the Pacific fleet.
so.. with that said.. Anyone need some tinfoil.. I have extra
Pearl Harbor?
its possible.. My minor was in history and I did a lot of coursework over WWII. There was a lot of evidence that Perl Harbor was used to rally the US behind the president to get into the conflict.
Previous to that, the US was in a state of isolationism; the popular consensus was that no one cared because it was happening half way around the world.
Ever wonder why all the US carriers were not in Perl Harbor but all 5 were out at sea ?
The only ships left in Perl Harbor were the weakest of the Pacific fleet.
so.. with that said.. Anyone need some tinfoil.. I have extra
i heard that theory about all the major ships were out on "training"
#265
BanHammer™
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Posts: 47,585
Car Info: 2001 Forester RS2 SPEC-F
I honestly dont see that as puddles. The one on the top more looks like a tire mark and the lowere looks like uneven pavement.
Some see a reflection in the asphalt.. I dont think so. I think its more with the jpeg compression and messing the the colors.
There is still no water on any of the cars. If it was raining enough to keep the asphalt a consistant color, there should be water on the cars as well.
Some see a reflection in the asphalt.. I dont think so. I think its more with the jpeg compression and messing the the colors.
There is still no water on any of the cars. If it was raining enough to keep the asphalt a consistant color, there should be water on the cars as well.
#266
Originally Posted by jvick125
Interesting. I've never once heard any conspiracies on Pearl Harbor. JFK... well. idk enough about him. But I know the Kennedy's have A LOT of skeletons in their closet.
Or it could have been the Mafia.
#267
BanHammer™
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Posts: 47,585
Car Info: 2001 Forester RS2 SPEC-F
Originally Posted by jvick125
Interesting. I've never once heard any conspiracies on Pearl Harbor. JFK... well. idk enough about him. But I know the Kennedy's have A LOT of skeletons in their closet.
Soggy: they claimed the fleets not in the harbor were on "training manuvers"
#268
Originally Posted by Mr. Xevious
I honestly dont see that as puddles. The one on the top more looks like a tire mark and the lowere looks like uneven pavement.
Some see a reflection in the asphalt.. I dont think so. I think its more with the jpeg compression and messing the the colors.
There is still no water on any of the cars. If it was raining enough to keep the asphalt a consistant color, there should be water on the cars as well.
Some see a reflection in the asphalt.. I dont think so. I think its more with the jpeg compression and messing the the colors.
There is still no water on any of the cars. If it was raining enough to keep the asphalt a consistant color, there should be water on the cars as well.