My bad edperience at Maita

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #76  
drdray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 166
From: Sacramento, Ca
Car Info: MY04 Silver STi
Originally Posted by Cohnster
I think drdray is making assumptions...and we all know now, assuming is the mother of all ****ups
I'm not. All are facts.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #77  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Originally Posted by drdray
Here may be this will help.
1 wrong skin was ordered not painted.

Correction:

1) Proper skin was ordered. Maita delivered wrong skin. Problem not discovered until the customer is out of pocket due to Maita delivering the wrong skin.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #78  
Grimm's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,325
From: Auto Drift King
Car Info: 2005 WRX Auto with high hopes :l
Originally Posted by drdray
I'm not. All are facts.
How would you know if its a fact if you aren't part of the situation, doesn't make sense. To me, you are making assumptions based on what you heard.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #79  
nachomc's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
Originally Posted by drdray
Here may be this will help.

1 wrong skin was ordered not painted.
2 offer to trade wrong skin for right skin was made.
3 Chris would be just as glad to exchange unpainted wrong skin for unpainted right skin
4 sogy paid to paint it, not Maita or any one else.
5 sogy refused to trade painted for not painted.
6 sogy refused the offer by Chris to sell his pained, and sell him not painted at a discount
7 Chris is made look like an *** for giving him options

SS and EQTuning are just an example from the past. Most of you trusted and believed SS was the bastes tuner, now it turns out he did half-*** jobs on a number of cars. What lesson did you learn from this? Obviously none. I'm done arguing here. Believe what you want, it's your problem not mine.
I'm glad you're done arguing because your arguments, spelling and grammar are **** poor.

You seem to miss the fact that MAITA ORDERED THE WRONG PART IN THE FIRST PLACE. The customer isn't obligated to test fit a part before getting it painted, he shouldn't have to. The parts department at a Subaru dealership should be competent enough to order the right part for a car when the customer provides a VIN number and specifies a year/make/model in addition. If Maita wanted to take care of their customer, they'd eat the $200 it cost Ed to paint his bumper, and give Ed a proper bumper and cover his original costs to paint it. Maita could then recover some of their losses by selling the bumper as a painted piece. They'd be out maybe $100 or so max and they'd have a happy customer to boot. $100 is a small price to pay to keep a customer happy and coming back to buy more parts in the future, unfortunately Maita doesn't seem to be able to see that.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #80  
drdray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 166
From: Sacramento, Ca
Car Info: MY04 Silver STi
Originally Posted by nKoan
Correction:

1) Proper skin was ordered. Maita delivered wrong skin. Problem not discovered until the customer is out of pocket due to Maita delivering the wrong skin.
You're twisting the facts, read what Chris said.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #81  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Originally Posted by drdray
SS and EQTuning are just an example from the past. Most of you trusted and believed SS was the bastes tuner, now it turns out he did half-*** jobs on a number of cars. What lesson did you learn from this? Obviously none. I'm done arguing here. Believe what you want, it's your problem not mine.
I'm still not following you. So EQ or S-Squared painted the bumper? You are making the assumption that everyone here thinks the same and has the same opinion about everything. And if you knew anything about anything, you'd realize thats a stupid assumption to make. Please, this is about a customer unhappy with maita, no need to bring other shops into this.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #82  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Originally Posted by drdray
You're twisting the facts, read what Chris said.
To be perfectly honest, Chris has called me names on this forum and has lied to me countless times. I'll believe Ed's story before Chris', unless there is compelling evidence otherwise (which has yet to be proven).
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #83  
Mr. Furley's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,866
From: Fugitive
Car Info: MOPAR Baby!! yeeaaaahhh
So everyone that buys a house has to be a certified building inspector?? COME ON man you cant win this arguement... maita are "parts specialists" and the guy gave them the CORRECT VIN NUMBER and they gave him the wrong part... who is actually going to dissasemble their front end & test fit a goddamn OEM bumper they got from the DEALERSHIP with a CORRECT VIN???! its not like this is some brand new bumper design from a sweatshop in burma... he spent a lot of money at the dealership trusting them to be the experts and they SCREWED UP plain & simple
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #84  
drdray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 166
From: Sacramento, Ca
Car Info: MY04 Silver STi
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
I'm glad you're done arguing because your arguments, spelling and grammar are **** poor.

You seem to miss the fact that MAITA ORDERED THE WRONG PART IN THE FIRST PLACE. The customer isn't obligated to test fit a part before getting it painted, he shouldn't have to. The parts department at a Subaru dealership should be competent enough to order the right part for a car when the customer provides a VIN number and specifies a year/make/model in addition. If Maita wanted to take care of their customer, they'd eat the $200 it cost Ed to paint his bumper, and give Ed a proper bumper and cover his original costs to paint it. Maita could then recover some of their losses by selling the bumper as a painted piece. They'd be out maybe $100 or so max and they'd have a happy customer to boot. $100 is a small price to pay to keep a customer happy and coming back to buy more parts in the future, unfortunately Maita doesn't seem to be able to see that.
I could care less what you think of my grammar and spelling.

If you buy something you should check that it is what you want, not assume. You are give the oportunity to do so at you own will. All it is now is a blame game.

I'm glad that you are not twisting facts as nKoan did.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #85  
nachomc's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
Originally Posted by nKoan
To be perfectly honest, Chris has called me names on this forum and has lied to me countless times. I'll believe Ed's story before Chris's, unless there is compelling evidence otherwise.
Not to mention the fact that in correspondence with Ed, Chris admitted to ordering a wagon bumper because Ed originally showed up in a white WRX wagon. So basically Chris admitted fault and then tried to blame shift to Ed for not test fitting the bumper, something Ed is not obligated to do.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #86  
drdray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 166
From: Sacramento, Ca
Car Info: MY04 Silver STi
Originally Posted by Mr. Furley
So everyone that buys a house has to be a certified building inspector?? COME ON man you cant win this arguement... maita are "parts specialists" and the guy gave them the CORRECT VIN NUMBER and they gave him the wrong part... who is actually going to dissasemble their front end & test fit a goddamn OEM bumper they got from the DEALERSHIP with a CORRECT VIN???! its not like this is some brand new bumper design from a sweatshop in burma... he spent a lot of money at the dealership trusting them to be the experts and they SCREWED UP plain & simple
You have 2 options here:

1 Do inspection yourself
2 Pay some one to do it.

There is a member here that does home loans or selling houses, ask him. He'll explan the process for you.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #87  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
drdray, one other quick question, why is it that you only show up on our forums when Maita is involved? Are you an employee of Maita as well? or are you just a friend of Chris?
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #88  
drdray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 166
From: Sacramento, Ca
Car Info: MY04 Silver STi
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
Not to mention the fact that in correspondence with Ed, Chris admitted to ordering a wagon bumper because Ed originally showed up in a white WRX wagon. So basically Chris admitted fault and then tried to blame shift to Ed for not test fitting the bumper, something Ed is not obligated to do.

nKoan, here is your prove from someone that you trust and know.
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #89  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Originally Posted by drdray
nKoan, here is your prove from someone that you trust and know.
You mean, the proof that Maita ****ed up and delivered the wrong part to Ed?
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #90  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Originally Posted by nKoan
drdray, one other quick question, why is it that you only show up on our forums when Maita is involved? Are you an employee of Maita as well? or are you just a friend of Chris?
waiting on an answer.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 PM.