California Atty General Sues Car Makers over Global Warming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
nachomc's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
California Atty General Sues Car Makers over Global Warming

Our state is ****ing embarrassing .


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14924286/

SAN FRANCISCO - California filed suit against the world's largest carmakers on Wednesday, charging that greenhouse gases from their vehicles have cost the state millions of dollars.

State Attorney General Bill Lockyer said the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California was the first of its kind to seek to hold manufacturers liable for the damages caused by their vehicles' emissions.

Lockyer, a Democrat, said the complaint states that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a “public nuisance” by producing “millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide.”

Carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases have been linked to global warming.

Lockyer's office said that “under the law, a ‘public nuisance’ is an unreasonable interference with a public right, or an action that interferes with or causes harm to life, health or property.”

“Global warming is causing significant harm to California’s environment, economy, agriculture and public health. The impacts are already costing millions of dollars and the price tag is increasing,” Lockyer said in a statement. “Vehicle emissions are the single most rapidly growing source of the carbon emissions contributing to global warming, yet the federal government and automakers have refused to act. It is time to hold these companies responsible for their contribution to this crisis.”

The lawsuit names Ford, General Motors, Toyota and the North American units of DaimlerChrysler, Honda and Nissan.

Carmakers earlier sued to block a 2005 California law that would require them to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020.

California and 11 other states are also involved in a lawsuit challenging the Bush administration's refusal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The Supreme Court is expected to hear that case during its upcoming term.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #2  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Brilliant!~
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #3  
nachomc's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #4  
midnitewrx02's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,064
From: Elk Grove
Car Info: 2006 CGM WRX
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
cool! so that means i get to go catless right?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #5  
skimonkey30's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,952
From: Ya, Ray Romano gets all the chicks.
Car Info: 05 LGT Wagon MT
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
But i think subaru is now an entity of GM......am i right?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #6  
Sky92x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 803
From: Deep in a secret lair under Denio's.
Car Info: Bastard child of Saab and Subaru.
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by skimonkey30
But i think subaru is now an entity of GM......am i right?
A few years ago, GM owned 25% of subaru. This made the bastard that is the Saab 92x possible.

GM sold their share before the 2006 model year. (As a result, the 92x's last year is 2006, and doesnt get all the upgrades that the WRX did.)

So the 92x is a rare duck at 15k total production numbers.

wish that helped the resale.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #7  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Toyota bought most of the shares that GM sold, IIRC.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
GT35 STI's Avatar
Troll
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,877
From: In SoggyNoodles Low Rise Pants
Car Info: 2008 Legacy Spec-B
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Toyota bought most of the shares that GM sold, IIRC.

correct 20% to Toyota... 5% back to Fuji! :banana:
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #9  
T-Will's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,232
From: Front pleated TWill pants...
Car Info: 2004 PSM WRX
I think I see the problem.

Lockyer, a Democrat said the complaint states that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a “public nuisance” by producing “millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide.”
****ing retards...can Ahnold do anything about this?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
T-Will's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,232
From: Front pleated TWill pants...
Car Info: 2004 PSM WRX
Oh yeah, and if this isn't bad enough, I'm sure you guys know about the cell phone ban...

http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/fo...040bdc2e729d54
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #11  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by T-Will
I think I see the problem.



****ing retards...can Ahnold do anything about this?
As if there is a correlation between political affiliation and intelligence. Just look at Dubya...
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #12  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by T-Will
Oh yeah, and if this isn't bad enough, I'm sure you guys know about the cell phone ban...

http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/fo...040bdc2e729d54
The best part is that using your hands isn't what makes cell phones unsafe. The distraction of the conversation and the result of your focus being somewhere other than not killing people in your land yacht is.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #13  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
what's next, suing the motorists for contributing to the fake global warming?

besides, why go after the manufacturers? new cars are far cleaner than older cars.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #14  
Egan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,221
From: Peoples Republik of Kalifornia
Car Info: 05 H2 SUT, 45 GPW, 10 Murano, 13 Boss 302
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
The best part is that using your hands isn't what makes cell phones unsafe. The distraction of the conversation and the result of your focus being somewhere other than not killing people in your land yacht is.
But at least you can put both hands on the wheel now.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
ryball's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 17,617
From: pew, pew, pew!!!
Car Info: nonplussed
Originally Posted by RussB
fake global warming?
:rotfl:



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:18 PM.