Question for all you 16G owners w/ 2L wrx's

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 25, 2009 | 03:41 PM

#16

ProjekBluBuk

Registered User

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 1,113

From: 96707, 808

Car Info: a pickup truck with a gun rack.

so what im getting is that overall 16g>vf34?

Jul 25, 2009 | 05:15 PM

#17

808subaru

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 3,823

From: mid-atlantic/va

Car Info: 09 xt

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProjekBluBuk

so what im getting is that overall 16g>vf34?

Not necessarily. For me, and what i need it to do, i do believe a certain 16g is a better option. For most, a VF34 should work best. I don't think very many people have the same goals as me, so YMMV.

Jul 25, 2009 | 05:25 PM

#18

808subaru

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 3,823

From: mid-atlantic/va

Car Info: 09 xt

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krang

I have the Deadbolt Super 16g, Deadbolts version of the evo iii, and I really like it. Full boost in 3rd @ 3k, and it pulls hard until redline compared to my vf39 I had previously. My next step is going to be a TD05 20g 7/8cm though, stronger up top where you want it.

I believe I put down 279whp/259wtq when it was dyno tuned.

The TQ# is okay, but your HP# seems around 15-20HP lower than others i've seen.
Not that i'd be complaining, b/c your results are already 35ish more power than i was putting out after a tune.

Jul 25, 2009 | 06:38 PM

#19

joejoe69

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 1,049

From: Ewa Beach Hawaii

Car Info: 2015 CWP STI

I was gonna say, a regular TD05-16G puts out pretty much the same as a VF34 (280-300whp avg). Pretty conservative for a Super 16G, which averages over 300whp.

The plus side of Mitsubishi turbos is they're rebuildable. VF series can't be. However, Blouch says they can.