No need for words

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 13, 2004 | 10:37 PM

#16

WRaigeX

Registered User

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 323

From: Honolulu

Car Info: 04 STi

holy crap!!!

Jun 13, 2004 | 11:44 PM

#17

.:: 808 STi ::.

VIP Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 4,990

From: on da compz...readin' yo blogz

Car Info: "the loud one"

......

no comment....

damn....

that's one big motor...and 2 big turbo's...and one big supercharger...

Jun 15, 2004 | 10:13 AM

#18

Mach5WRX

Angry Dan

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 7,183

From: www.turboculture.com

Car Info: 05 Evo VIII

Jun 15, 2004 | 01:02 PM

#19

IS2Scooby

Pr0n King

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 26,618

From: The Land of Rocks

Car Info: Turncoat Turbo

I can't believe he kept it carbureted instead of going EFI.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Jun 15, 2004 | 01:10 PM

#20

Magish

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 4,650

From: Mountains

Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier

It is my professional guess that that thing is freakin fast.

Jun 15, 2004 | 01:41 PM

#21

Subaruski42o

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 1,122

From: Rockford, IL

Car Info: 98 RS

man thats rice as hell

Jun 15, 2004 | 02:18 PM

#22

gdogg

Registered User

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 7,783

From: rightBehindYou, HI

Car Info: 1973 Huevo Ranchero

Quote:

Originally Posted by IS2Scooby

I can't believe he kept it carbureted instead of going EFI.

this might be a "blind" statement . . . but wouldn't EFI be a little too "effecient"(conservative) for that set-up? personally if i had that setup i would go with a "nuts and bolts" setup versus EFI. . . i dunno i'm not that inclined- my only "hot-rod" experience is my mustang. unless he could used a EFI system from a vette.

(i'm just tryin to sound smart here...