New Cold Air Intake Problems
Guest
Posts: n/a
New Cold Air Intake Problems
I just installed a Weapon R intake on my 98 EJ22. At first I screwed up some vacuum routing (I had a long day and it was getting late) I fixed that the next day and got the car idling fine. It runs great and I notice considerable topend increase. HOWEVER when I start out hard, whether upshifting or starting from a start, and floor it, my car bogs down and I lose all power, it starts jumping and lurching until I let the gas up a little and rev it up slowly. Once the car is moving I can floor it and drop the revs with no prob, I can downshift and floor it, it takes off fine, it's only when I floor it under hight torque needs (i.e. starting out in 1st on a steep incline, or pulling out in traffic) As you can see this could be a problem. As for now I can keep the revs up and it will take off fine, but I never had this problem before I installed the intake. Any insight as to what may be the problem? Also if anyone has a Weaopon R installed and could send pics of where the vaccuum lines are ran that may help, I suppose I could still have a problem there. THanks
PLEASE NO WEAPON-R BASHING, I JUST WANT HELP, I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU THINK OF THE INTAKE, I JUST NEED SOME UNBIASED HELP ON THIS. THANKS
PLEASE NO WEAPON-R BASHING, I JUST WANT HELP, I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU THINK OF THE INTAKE, I JUST NEED SOME UNBIASED HELP ON THIS. THANKS
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
This is exactly why everyone keeps saying not to buy an open-element ram-air intake for an Impreza. The stock air box is there for a reason. The only way to get rid of the gutlessness at WOT and low RPMs is to put some sort of plenum back in the intake stream. There are no other ways to get around it.
It's not bashing when it's true.
It's not bashing when it's true.
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,723
From: Roseville, CA
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
Thats the exact problem we kept telling you Weapon-R buyers about... Low-end loss causing bogging. I had a simular intake on my car for awhile and it did the same thing.
Originally posted by Kostamojen
Thats the exact problem we kept telling you Weapon-R buyers about... Low-end loss causing bogging. I had a simular intake on my car for awhile and it did the same thing.
Thats the exact problem we kept telling you Weapon-R buyers about... Low-end loss causing bogging. I had a simular intake on my car for awhile and it did the same thing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by mysubaruimp
its not just weapon-r, its all intakes, the stock air box has a reserve that holds air for when you need it at low throttle, any aftermarket tube does not, unless you get one that connects to the stock airbox
its not just weapon-r, its all intakes, the stock air box has a reserve that holds air for when you need it at low throttle, any aftermarket tube does not, unless you get one that connects to the stock airbox
Originally posted by vr4impreza
Thank you this is what I was looking for, I knew it couldn't be the damn brand name, I was wandering what the problem is. I now have a new question, theoretically if I build some sort of air box for my intake, should this solve the problem? Also is the location of said box important?
Thank you this is what I was looking for, I knew it couldn't be the damn brand name, I was wandering what the problem is. I now have a new question, theoretically if I build some sort of air box for my intake, should this solve the problem? Also is the location of said box important?
Guest
Posts: n/a
The reason for the custom build is for the look and also so I can incorporate my Weapon R filter and intake pipe, obviously there is an advantage to the larger intake diameter. As for design, I would think there is some give in the size, the only main thing you would have to take into consideration is volume of air in reserve, but obviously that wouldn't have to be an exact volume, because as your needs and throttle changes the volume in reserve would change so therefore I wouldn't think that is a large issue, just a thought. I do have a degree in Mechanical Engineering, I guess I could pull out some books and figure this out, I was just curious if anyone knew of an easy solution. But thanks for the insightful help.
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,723
From: Roseville, CA
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
Originally posted by mysubaruimp
its not just weapon-r, its all intakes, the stock air box has a reserve that holds air for when you need it at low throttle, any aftermarket tube does not, unless you get one that connects to the stock airbox
its not just weapon-r, its all intakes, the stock air box has a reserve that holds air for when you need it at low throttle, any aftermarket tube does not, unless you get one that connects to the stock airbox
Ive had personal experience with every intake mentioned exept the Injen and including the weapon-R combined with years of information about all the intakes and modifications for N/A Imprezas. Why do you guys persist on acting like we people who say this stuff dont know anything?
Just incredible...
ganzflow
pdm
from cobb: Mounted directly behind the throttle body is the mysterious black plastic plenum whose function has been the subject of much debate. This box was completely empty inside, serving only as a chamber, until mid-1999 when Subaru included a secondary air filter inside. While we haven't discussed the details of this design with the engineers at Subaru, we can make some assumptions as to the reasons of this layout based on some theories behind intake systems. One of the primary reasons for this chamber is to act as a supplemental intake plenum to improve throttle response. When you go from low throttle to wide open throttle, the engine's demand for air increases drastically and the stock intake manifold with it's small plenum lacks the necessary volume to satisfy the engine's demands. To remedy this, Subaru uses this secondary air box as a supplemental plenum to supply this sudden demand of air. This gives us the throttle response we want and keeps our engine happy.
you need the stock airbox, ganzflow an pdm keep it. i dont understand how you can call me an idiot when you say that the intakes you listed work fine without it when most keep it
pdm
from cobb: Mounted directly behind the throttle body is the mysterious black plastic plenum whose function has been the subject of much debate. This box was completely empty inside, serving only as a chamber, until mid-1999 when Subaru included a secondary air filter inside. While we haven't discussed the details of this design with the engineers at Subaru, we can make some assumptions as to the reasons of this layout based on some theories behind intake systems. One of the primary reasons for this chamber is to act as a supplemental intake plenum to improve throttle response. When you go from low throttle to wide open throttle, the engine's demand for air increases drastically and the stock intake manifold with it's small plenum lacks the necessary volume to satisfy the engine's demands. To remedy this, Subaru uses this secondary air box as a supplemental plenum to supply this sudden demand of air. This gives us the throttle response we want and keeps our engine happy.
you need the stock airbox, ganzflow an pdm keep it. i dont understand how you can call me an idiot when you say that the intakes you listed work fine without it when most keep it
Last edited by mysubaruimp; Jun 15, 2003 at 06:22 AM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
it seems to me that mysubaruimp is the only one that replies with some sort of factual backing, other than "I''ve driven with one and it doesn't work" or "I know someone who has this one and they like it", Cause if we do that I Can simply take the quotes from Weapon R that say this is superior and improves hp and airflow. I mean they should have the most experience here. Obviously there is a flaw in this design I don't doubt that. BUt thank you mysubaruimp for helping me figure out this flaw and possibly fix it, instead of just saying that it won't work. I'll keep you posted on my mods to this intake and let you know how it works out.
There are many reasons why one intake works and another doesn't. The Cobb intake works well because of its filter design- it can supply enough air for good throttle response while delivering more air at high rpm than other j- bend style intakes. The old Rallispec intake was reported to be not too bad either but probably not as good as a Cobb intake as the Cobb intake is a true CAI. You might try just putting a better filter on your intake first and see what happens.
Having a large airbox is good for throttle response but it can be a limiting factor at high rpm because the air wants to stall as it enters the airbox.
Gary at Compass Motorsports made an airbox style intake that had a good plenum size (I'm going to guess around 3 to 4 liters) and it had a straight inlet that the filter mounted on. Keeping the inlet as straight as possible probably helped a little bit at keeping the intake flowing well at high rpm. It looked like a really good design (he went through a few different versions before this one) but it just turned out to be too expensive to produce.
If you want to make your own I'd make it something like the Compass intake but I'd have a full radius inlet for the throttle body. It's also best to keep the inlet for throttle body as far away from the sides of the airbox as possible but given the size limitations it's hard to do. For the filter I'd either use the same filter as the Cobb or the new BMC CAI filter. If that's not possible due to cost, I'd just use a good K&N and make a heat shield and try to get the filter as close to the fender wall as possible.
Guess I'd better go fire up the welder!
Having a large airbox is good for throttle response but it can be a limiting factor at high rpm because the air wants to stall as it enters the airbox.
Gary at Compass Motorsports made an airbox style intake that had a good plenum size (I'm going to guess around 3 to 4 liters) and it had a straight inlet that the filter mounted on. Keeping the inlet as straight as possible probably helped a little bit at keeping the intake flowing well at high rpm. It looked like a really good design (he went through a few different versions before this one) but it just turned out to be too expensive to produce.
If you want to make your own I'd make it something like the Compass intake but I'd have a full radius inlet for the throttle body. It's also best to keep the inlet for throttle body as far away from the sides of the airbox as possible but given the size limitations it's hard to do. For the filter I'd either use the same filter as the Cobb or the new BMC CAI filter. If that's not possible due to cost, I'd just use a good K&N and make a heat shield and try to get the filter as close to the fender wall as possible.
Guess I'd better go fire up the welder!
I also forgot to mention the FLATT racing intake- these guys have been doing NA Imprezas for quite some time. An intake like this wouldn't be that hard to do.
http://www.flatt-racing.com
This is also the same company that modified the intake manfold by creating a bridge across the runners.
http://www.flatt-racing.com
This is also the same company that modified the intake manfold by creating a bridge across the runners.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the info, I think I can approxiamate the stock plenum size and use approx that. I figure a little less would be ok, because my airflow is increased. Basically I intend on making a large cylinder type design that will mount between the intake and the pipe. Whatever shape the design ends up being I want something symetrical. My car will be in the shop for the next week getting body work, So I will be thinking it over for that time and maybe designing and building, I'll keep you posted on how it turns out. Thanks again. Also to note on the filter problem. If airflow restriction with the weapon R filter, then removing it and giving that a try should improve response, right? I do realize I need a filter, but no filter will give the least restriction, and if that works, then it is obviously the filter. just a thought.
Last edited by vr4impreza; Jun 15, 2003 at 06:50 PM.
5Zigen made an intake plenum that looks like what you are talking about (although it was for forced induction.) It was basically just a big round cylinder. The important part is the transition from the air filter tube to your large cylinder plenum- if you can keep the angle of the transition near 15 degrees then there will be much less flow seperation and turbulence and the air will be less likely to stall as it enters the plenum. The problem with this is construction- it gets a bit tricky fitting it in the available space while trying to avois sharp bends in the intake pipe but it can definitely be done.
The other issue is finding large enough diameter tubing for the plenum (assuming you are making it in metal.) Whatever you do make sure the plenum has a full radius inlet for the throttle body- this will make a big difference in how your intake performs.
As far as the filter goes, a filter with proper venturi design will flow more air than no filter at all.
The other issue is finding large enough diameter tubing for the plenum (assuming you are making it in metal.) Whatever you do make sure the plenum has a full radius inlet for the throttle body- this will make a big difference in how your intake performs.
As far as the filter goes, a filter with proper venturi design will flow more air than no filter at all.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Your right about the filter, I never took into account the importance of the filter in airflow design. Also thanks for the insight on the tube. I am thinking of making it of a heavy PVC to start, as this will be cheap. If this works I will then possibly have one machined out of metal to fit more exacting dimensions. However I do agree finding materials with the proper dimensions will be tricky. Thanks for the help though. This is really useful info.


