Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas) Who needs a turbo when you have 2500cc? Cams, intakes, exhausts, etc. The 2.2L and 1.8L Subies are cool too.

Compression Ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #2  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Re: Compression Ratios

Originally posted by rayjle
I am not real clear on the beniefits/differences in compression ratios. What do they measure? How would, say, a truck be different than a sports car? What can one do to modify these ratios?
Every engine has a different compression ratio. Well, every model of engine, not individual ones. CR is the ratio of displacement of one cylinder to the volume of the combustion chamber at TDC for that piston. Higher compression ratios allow more power, but make the engine harder to manage and more inclined to blow up. In general, sports cars will defitinitely have higher compression than trucks, except for diesels, which have astronomically high compression... but that's a much longer lecture.
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
ImprezaVA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 137
From: Elkton, Virginia
Car Info: 1998 Subaru Impreza L 2.2
Nitrous, Turbocharged, and Supercharged applications are usually lower than 9:0 CR. I think my subaru L has a CR of 8:5:1 maybe? I have never understood how diesel, especially turbo diesels, can run astrnomically high CRs. I'm guessing it has something to do with 40 octane .

-Charles-
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 12:44 PM
  #5  
ImprezaVA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 137
From: Elkton, Virginia
Car Info: 1998 Subaru Impreza L 2.2
No Spark Plugs

That's right, I forgot they didn't have spark plugs. A CR of 20 is volitale to say the least, doesn't the Ford 7.3L Powerstrokes up that to around 22? I also think its cool how they redline at like 3,000 rpms, that's why they have so much torque and so little giddy-up-and-go. Anyway, back to gasoline....

-Charles-
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #8  
rentankonko's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 64
From: ChicagoLand
Car Info: 2.5rs with Eighteens!!!lol
hats off to Neouser for establishing the difference between dynamic and static compression ratios. Generally speaking, I personally believe that the terminology "compression ratio" has become a bit of an iconic hinge upon which the opinions and reasonings of the obligatorily ignorant opinion swings...now I may sound hostile, and I may very well be an idiot (who can ever tell for sure?), but I assure you I am not simply being contrarian...we have 450 horsepower turbocharged Porshes with 9.4:1 compression and 450 horsepower Subarus wth 8:1 compression (granted of course greater displacement has a part to play, but that is besides the point). Remember that the only reason for low compression ratios is to lower the detonation threshold as one turns up the boost ...INHERENTLY it has nothing to do with power. So, that being said, and I will cut myself off here before composing a veritable discertation of sorts, simply remember that compression ratio in regards to turbocharging is much more about accomodating high boost pressures than it is about actual power generation (it is a huge compromise and results in generally peaky HP and torque)...and as the body of American tuners become more educated over time, I gurantee we will see a greater trend towards moderate boost levels coupled with slightly HIGHER compression ratios...and not wonder so much anymore why it is that turbo Porsches seem to be so multitalented and almost completely and utterly own Japanese *** on a consistent basis...remember my fellow Americans that we are the modern evolution of the "muscle-car" phenomenon...peace and love to y'all
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 11:48 PM
  #9  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
[Ed McMahon on]
YES! You are corRECT, SIR!
[/Ed McMahon off]

Porsche definitely ownz. If it weren't for the 911and 944, Subaru probably wouldn't be using boxer engines, because they didn't have the resources to engineer the leap to water-cooled flat engines on their own. They borroed heavily from Porsche... now why don't more makers do that (hint hint GM!).

I am willing to bet that the EJ25T in the STi is no less than 9.0:1 compression for this very fact.
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 12:17 AM
  #10  
rentankonko's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 64
From: ChicagoLand
Car Info: 2.5rs with Eighteens!!!lol
thank you for expanding on my point...and I couldn't agree more
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Southerland
Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas)
3
Aug 25, 2004 05:30 AM
Williampreza
Suspension, Handling, and Brakes
2
Jul 4, 2004 02:31 PM
six1five
Drivetrain
7
Dec 15, 2003 10:07 PM
six1five
Drivetrain
1
Dec 14, 2003 06:04 PM
gpatmac
Hawaii
53
Aug 12, 2003 02:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:40 PM.