Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Double your Pleasure??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #1  
bedweaselwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 58
From: MN
Car Info: 2002 WRX
Double your Pleasure??

Now this may be a dumb question, as I am mechanically inclined but am not totally knowledgeable in the area of intercoolers/turbo's. In theory would it be possible on the WRX/STI to run double intercoolers, as in one at the original top mount location, and a front mount? I know that Audi runs double intercoolers on some of there cars like the S4 and RS6. If this is possible on a WRX/STI would it be beneficial to the car? And what sort of custom work would need to be done to make this happen? Just thought I would throw that out there and see if anyone here had any thoughts on it.
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #2  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
This is fully supposition on my part, but I don't think it would be beneficial until you start pushing a lot of power through the car. On a stock setup, you see minimal returns from an upgraded intercooler.

But, if you had a bigger turbo (or say twin sequential turbos), it may be beneficial.
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #3  
nachomc's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
Wouldn't the additional piping involved with multiple intercoolers significantly increase spool time?
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #4  
jdepould's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,659
From: USA
Car Info: 1990 thing
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
Wouldn't the additional piping involved with multiple intercoolers significantly increase spool time?
unless you had some kind of crazy intercooler vtec where it switched over to the front mount at high speed/full boost
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
bedweaselwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 58
From: MN
Car Info: 2002 WRX
I guess i forgot to mention the fact that this would not be used on a stock set up but on higher HP setups. and I don't see how you would have longer spool up time especially if you had an upgradded turbo, most new turbos are very quick to spool up fast.
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #6  
nachomc's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
I went hunting around - I guess it's more of a throttle response issue and lower boost at lower RPM. Pretty much everything I found indicated that there is additional lag resulting from a FMIC, though I couldn't find any real data as to why.
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
The reason for more 'lag' (actually, technically, it raises your turbo threshold) it because there is more piping.

With an FMIC you have to physically move more air through the pipes, and it will just plain take longer to pressurize the whole system. But, that can be significantly reduced with fast spooling turbos.
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #8  
nachomc's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,095
From: Funtown
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
Originally Posted by nKoan
The reason for more 'lag' (actually, technically, it raises your turbo threshold) it because there is more piping.

With an FMIC you have to physically move more air through the pipes, and it will just plain take longer to pressurize the whole system. But, that can be significantly reduced with fast spooling turbos.
Cool, I thought this to be the case, but I didn't want to misinform
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doodoo57
Hawaii
3
Mar 19, 2005 01:12 PM
RoadSpike
Hawaii
4
Apr 10, 2004 02:04 AM
dr3d1zzl3
Bay Area
52
Feb 14, 2004 11:18 AM
dropkick_muppet
Bay Area
0
Jul 12, 2003 08:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.