Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Borla Hush is sweet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #1  
mmboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,639
From: Longing for my ol' white '02 WRX :(
Car Info: 2016 Acura RDX ... meh. Um, nice subwoofer?
Thumbs up Borla Hush is sweet

Had mine installed today by MPJ/GB ( since it needed a new flange welded). Sounds very nice mated to me helix dp. Before, I was running stock dp and hks catback. Then I was was catless with the hks. And now catless with the Hush. This last combination reminds me of havin the HKS w/ a stock downpipe in terms of volume, no kidding.

Just from the buttdyno, I could swear I'm getting a little more backpressure. This might bother some of the pure top-end junkies, but it sure feels like a little better response down low.

jason
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #2  
MO REX's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,245
From: St. Louis MO
Car Info: 02 PSM WRX
I was under the impression that unlike n/a motors an increase in back pressure wouldnt help down low with a turbo motor.
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 09:21 PM
  #3  
jdepould's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,659
From: USA
Car Info: 1990 thing
backpressure is bad on any motor, n/a or f/i, the problem is if you go too big you'll lose exhaust velocity which you want to be as high as possible with minimum backpressure, n/a or f/i doesn't matter, f/i generally uses bigger exhaust piping because there's more exhaust gas flowing at a higher rate due to the turbo/blower
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #4  
MO REX's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,245
From: St. Louis MO
Car Info: 02 PSM WRX
Im not claiming to know this but from what I've read here at i-club you only need pre turbo velocity for good spool. Post turbo you want the least amount of backpressure possible.
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #5  
mmboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,639
From: Longing for my ol' white '02 WRX :(
Car Info: 2016 Acura RDX ... meh. Um, nice subwoofer?
It really depends on who you ask. I've heard both sides of the argument, for NA and turbo before. And, both sides from reputable sources... including dyno plots. I think its just application specific. The only justification for what my buttdyno senses that I can think of is not a direct result of "less" air flow, but a byproduct of it. That is, heat. A constricted flow produces more heat. So while volume may be less, perhaps the flow is quicker. WTF do I know, eh?

jason
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
jdepould's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,659
From: USA
Car Info: 1990 thing
backpressure = bad, period.
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #7  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
the ideal exhaust for a turbo is a big, smooth, horn on the end end of the turbo. You want the least amount of back pressure after the turbo while still keeping the flow somewhat smooth at the turbo's outlet. I have yet to see any data to prove that more back pressure makes more low end on a turbo engine. I've also yet to see any justifiable physics arguments to show this.

The fact of it is that a low compression, small displacement motor is not going to be making any significant torque without boost. The less restriction there is after the turbo, the quicker it will spool and make boost... period. I don't understand how people expect to get more low end with a more restrictive exhaust that slows down the spool of the turbo.

-- Ed
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #8  
mmboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,639
From: Longing for my ol' white '02 WRX :(
Car Info: 2016 Acura RDX ... meh. Um, nice subwoofer?
Originally Posted by vaus
I don't understand how people expect to get more low end with a more restrictive exhaust that slows down the spool of the turbo.

-- Ed
What about wrapping then? In effect you are creating more pressure in the pipe, and its not unidirectional - the gas wants to go every direction but is forced into (basically) one direction. This results in faster flow. Why is this not like a very light application of backpressure?

jason

[edit] p.s. remember, I said "faster flow" not "higher volume"
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #9  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Wrapping the exhaust post turbo doesn't have much of an effect on power or spool. Any effect that it does have comes from more heat being retained in the exhaust. Although the hotter gas takes up more volume, the velocity increase is more significant, so you're not actually increasing backpressure by retaining more heat.

-- Ed
Old Aug 8, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #10  
jdepould's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,659
From: USA
Car Info: 1990 thing
http://www.clubprotege.com/forum/sho...t=backpressure
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #11  
mmboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,639
From: Longing for my ol' white '02 WRX :(
Car Info: 2016 Acura RDX ... meh. Um, nice subwoofer?
Originally Posted by vaus
Wrapping the exhaust post turbo doesn't have much of an effect on power or spool. Any effect that it does have comes from more heat being retained in the exhaust. Although the hotter gas takes up more volume, the velocity increase is more significant, so you're not actually increasing backpressure by retaining more heat.

-- Ed
Heh, I think you just repeated what I said and then ended with an opposite conclusion.

Hey remember everyone, if its on the Internet... ITS TRUE!
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #12  
Christian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 273
From: Good Ol' LA
Car Info: 03' WRB
my buddy and i had identical turbo rx7s. i had a racing beat 3" exhaust and he was running stock with some glass packs. i had a more free flowing exhaust where he had a little more backpressure because of his more restrictive exhaust. he could always take me 1st threw low 3rd, but towrd the top of 3rd to 5th i was just walking him... we thought it might be the driver but we switched cars and it was the same result. i dont know i personally think that the best exhaust for a turbo car is no exhaust. but hey thats just my .02 centz

<))><
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 02:17 AM
  #13  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by Christian
my buddy and i had identical turbo rx7s. i had a racing beat 3" exhaust and he was running stock with some glass packs. i had a more free flowing exhaust where he had a little more backpressure because of his more restrictive exhaust. he could always take me 1st threw low 3rd, but towrd the top of 3rd to 5th i was just walking him... we thought it might be the driver but we switched cars and it was the same result. i dont know i personally think that the best exhaust for a turbo car is no exhaust. but hey thats just my .02 centz

<))><
When people say a more restrictive exhaust helps low end, they mean it helps in the lower RPM range... not the lower speed range. Maybe your friend had better tires or suspension upgrades and was therefore able to get more traction in 1-2.

-- Ed
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
i<3dirt
Sacramento & Reno
54
May 23, 2014 07:15 AM
whtSTI04
NorCal Classifieds
3
Apr 18, 2008 11:21 PM
06scooby
Ongoing Projects
10
Oct 6, 2006 10:47 AM
Crisisback
NorCal Classifieds
6
Jul 20, 2004 08:25 PM
jroh_spice
Engine Management
10
May 7, 2004 12:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 AM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.