dumb comparison trolling
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by John #555
cheer up bud. if you get to the bottom of the article you'll see this
"...both editors decided to go with the WRX. As one of them said, "It was less expensive and it had the better balance between performance and usability. If I had to drive one of these cars everyday, it'd be the WRX."
If they picked regular WRX over Evo VII, imagine what the STi with more hp and close ratio 6 spd will do against 'top of the line' Evo
personally, i've been waiting to see such comparison just to see how MY car would do against Evo ...on the paper at least
cheer up bud. if you get to the bottom of the article you'll see this
"...both editors decided to go with the WRX. As one of them said, "It was less expensive and it had the better balance between performance and usability. If I had to drive one of these cars everyday, it'd be the WRX."
If they picked regular WRX over Evo VII, imagine what the STi with more hp and close ratio 6 spd will do against 'top of the line' Evo
personally, i've been waiting to see such comparison just to see how MY car would do against Evo ...on the paper at least
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,650
From: Mountains
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
What type of course are you talking about? Road course, Auto-x, what. If you are talking about either one of those the driver is much more important than the car...you could have a 700 hp car with the best handling ever but you could still get whooped by a 200hp car with a better driver.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
T-Will
Sacramento & Reno
112
Sep 10, 2008 11:38 PM
