Drivetrain Encompasses driveline components such as the torque converter, clutch, transmission, shifter, front and center differentials, driveshaft, rear differential, and axles.

DogBox Tranny Faq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #1  
My_Red_Suby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 345
From: New Jersey
Car Info: 2005 Metallic Gray STI
DogBox Tranny Faq

I know that Dog Box Tranny's are built for the sole purpose of withstanding high horsepower/tourque output of highly modified cars.

I know all the pros of these trannies but what are the cons? What disadvantages does it have over the OEM one if daily driven/street driven(Noises, hard shifts, etc...)?

Any feedback bad or good...
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
Originally Posted by My_Red_Suby
I know that Dog Box Tranny's are built for the sole purpose of withstanding high horsepower/tourque output of highly modified cars.

I know all the pros of these trannies but what are the cons? What disadvantages does it have over the OEM one if daily driven/street driven(Noises, hard shifts, etc...)?

Any feedback bad or good...

The main problem with a 5mt is the case flex. It seperates the gears slighty then crushes them with tremendous force. A stronger gearset though will last longer will not last forever.

A STI 6 speed tranny has little flex and to my understanding is a far superior choice in transmissions.

Dog boxes also have straight cut gears to my undestanding. If so they will be noisey like reverse is at high speed.
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #3  
gpatmac's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
Dog or straight-cut gears (photo off of TurboXS website.)


syncro gears


I have no idea of the actual mechanics behind why, but straight gears are so much harder to shift because you have to rev-match (engine speed has to be at such and such revs in order for you to be able to shift smoothly), where syncro gears have syncros to assist you when you shift.

Also, straight gears are much noisier (hence what Roadspike is talking about. Your reverse gear is straight cut.)

That's about all I know and 'know' is relative.
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #4  
senortighto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 129
From: orange county
Car Info: 04 wrb wrx
its not that straight cut gears are harder to shift by themselves, its that with all the dog box trannies sold right now, they make the gears physically larger so there is not place for a synchro; hence the difficulty shifting between gears. they require perfect rev matching so they synch together without grinding, so you the driver has to perform the function of a synchro everytime you shift gears.
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 12:07 AM
  #5  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
Originally Posted by senortighto
its not that straight cut gears are harder to shift by themselves, its that with all the dog box trannies sold right now, they make the gears physically larger so there is not place for a synchro; hence the difficulty shifting between gears. they require perfect rev matching so they synch together without grinding, so you the driver has to perform the function of a synchro everytime you shift gears.
Not perfectly true..

A dog box yes doesn't use synchro's but actually gets its name by the synchronizer. Its a set of usually 6 dog teeth. These teeth under extreme revs would grind but during mostly synchro'ed shifts slam the gears into synch.

Just for example you can clear see the dog teeth on the rings here


And for the record you can get better synchro gearsets if you believe dog box sets are a lil too much harshness for your comfort

Edit:
Synchro sets even with straight cut gears if you like.
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
senortighto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 129
From: orange county
Car Info: 04 wrb wrx
neat, didn't know that. learn something new everyday
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #7  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Straight cut gears are stronger (more contact surface between gears at any given moment) while the helical cut gears are much quieter. That's why the gearsets meant for strength use straight cut and OEM gears are not. The shifting differences, as noted above, come from synchro differences (or absence).
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 06:29 AM
  #8  
04blkWRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 499
From: North NJ
Car Info: Black WRX, stock
Straight gears also (ideally) only transfer tangential forces - torque. Helical gears will transmit axial forces as well as torque so some of the engine effort is trying to push the gears into the thrust bearings instead of trying to turn the shaft.
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #9  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Straight cut gears are stronger (more contact surface between gears at any given moment) while the helical cut gears are much quieter. That's why the gearsets meant for strength use straight cut and OEM gears are not. The shifting differences, as noted above, come from synchro differences (or absence).
I was taught that the straight cuts are actually not neccessarily stronger becuase its less tooth metal (sideways is longer)

However it works better becuase the load placed on the gear on a helical gear is sideways which puts alot of pressure on the bearings, straight cuts however do not have this issue. Therefore in higher torque apps the straight cut works better becuase of how the pressure is distrubuted on the gears.
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #10  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
I was taught that the straight cuts are actually not neccessarily stronger becuase its less tooth metal (sideways is longer)
The straight cut gears have a larger contact area between teeth, which reduces the stress on the metal. It's like the difference between hitting a nail into a piece of wood and hitting a railroad spike. Same amount of force applied, different results.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #11  
1WRX2NV's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,962
From: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Car Info: 02 STi
so would it be difficult to shift in a wrx with a dogbox...as an everyday driver??

-freddie
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 04:06 AM
  #12  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Yes. A dogbox makes lots of noises and is very hard to be smooth with. It will make you look like a noob with a manual shifter.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #13  
1WRX2NV's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,962
From: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Car Info: 02 STi
YES!!!! Just what I always wanted.

thanks bro

-freddie
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #14  
gpatmac's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
Freddie, you know you share a screen name with another guy who has or had a fairly infamous WRX, don't you.

Anyhow, I uploaded this article I stole from MRT about Dogs:
MRT.doc
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #15  
1WRX2NV's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,962
From: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Car Info: 02 STi
Originally Posted by gpatmac
Freddie, you know you share a screen name with another guy who has or had a fairly infamous WRX, don't you.

Anyhow, I uploaded this article I stole from MRT about Dogs:
MRT.doc

lol...I think I was first to have it!! Also, I HAD fairly infamous WRX too. Plus, my last 3 cars had the LP #'s as 1***2NV. (WRX, SVT, VW)

Hey, thanks for the link...good stuff. I already have a JDM Sti 6 speed...just wanted some info on the dogbox.

thanks again

-freddie



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:27 AM.