Car Lounge General automotive talk not specific to Subaru.

SUV's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #1  
BugEyedFreak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 31
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Car Info: 2002 WRX, WR Blue
Question SUV's

Again, dont' really know if this is the right forum or not, but here goes. I'm sure I'll get my post flamed or moved if it's not.

Anyway, I work at a GMC-Pontiac dealership (in sales) and I can get used cars that are going to wholesale for $500 more than we paid for them. This usually comes in well under KBB trade in value. There's two SUV's I'm looking at because I'm tired of putting miles on my 2002 WRX traveling back and forth between NC and FL and getting the **** beaten out of it in a fraternity house parking lot.

One is a 97 Montero SR with 4wd, leather, sunroof, and all the trappings. 102K miles. The other is a 97 Grand Cherokee Laredo, cloth, 2wd, 75K miles. I can get the Montero for $3800 or the Cherokee for $4300. Both run well with no detectable mechanical deficiencies (I used to work as a mechanic, as well, so I can tell if someone's trying to sell me garbage.)

Two questions to anyone who may know...first, any horror stories or reliability issues from either, and second, which one should I get? The montero's more luxurious and has 4wd, but the Cherokee has 25K less miles. I don't really care about style or performance as i get plenty of both from the WRX (and its garage-mate, a mustang.) Thanks...
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
I'm not a big fan of jeeps becuase my cousins own them. Now i'm unsure if its the way the owners are a bit clueless to how cars work or not but the jeeps seem to always have problems.

For example his jeep for no real reason just started spewing oil in various leaks and he had tranny issues with it slipping.. That thing is a mess (grand chorokee btw) and it doesn't even have alot of miles on it.

I sorta wonder if it will live a few more years with the way the motor runs now. It practically stalls when you give it gas.

Anyways i'm done raggin on those two jeeps.

A montero is a mitsubishi car isn't it? If so realiability is sorta a questionable thing on those cars.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
BugEyedFreak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 31
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Car Info: 2002 WRX, WR Blue
Angry

Great, so they both suck. I'll just have to wait for Infiniti to have that big 95% off sale so I can afford the FX45 I really want...
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
For $3800 or $4500, who cares if the one you get has a problem or two in the next couple years? You'll still come out way ahead. I think the Montero is a bit better vehicle than the Grand Cherokee as far as design, but I can't comment on reliability of either very much. The Jeep does have a V8 which may or may not be in its favor in your situation. Neither one will get very good mileage on your commute.
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 10:14 AM
  #5  
thebankman's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,819
From: Bay Area
Car Info: subaru
I heard the 04 Montero was the slowest production vehicle of that model year out of all USA cars.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bone324
Car Lounge
22
Mar 5, 2004 04:59 AM
whitelegacy98
Car Lounge
17
Dec 10, 2003 06:07 AM
brucelee
Bay Area
3
Jun 5, 2003 07:11 AM
FaLeX
Car Lounge
12
Jan 31, 2003 02:19 PM
i-speed
Bay Area
21
Jan 23, 2003 09:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 AM.