Car Lounge General automotive talk not specific to Subaru.

Motor Trend Results In EVO is Faster than Sti

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #22  
awns729's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
IMO the evo is the only respectable mitsu...its an honorable competitor but i would never buy one just cuz its not my type....not what i want...
Old May 4, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #24  
Kostamojen's Avatar
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,723
From: Roseville, CA
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
Geez, did any of you even read the rest of this Motor Trend issue?

Other than the EVO's 1/4 mile and 60second times, there was nothing but praise for Subaru's througout the whole issue! There was that article about the Forester (basically saying dont get the Mitsubishi, save up for the Forester, LOL!) and a great article about the PPP WRX, and even that article about the "New Muscle Car Wars". All great stuff, and that whole STI article had nothing but praise as well. They seemed as confused about the track times as we are if you read between the lines.
Old May 5, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #25  
awns729's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
the 1/4 mile times dont even matter...they werent more than a few tenths of a sec apart
Old May 5, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #26  
WRX-pilot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 418
From: Orange County, CA
Car Info: 05 WRB STi
Motortrend puts mitsu on top again...

Just a quick note, this isn't the first time Motor Trend has put the Evo against Subaru, about a year ago they had the Evolution 7 against a WRX. Obviously the Mitsubishi won because the Evo 7 had more power than our WRX. But just thought that it was a little funny.
Old May 5, 2003 | 04:51 PM
  #27  
awns729's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
car and driver...i think... choose the wrx over the evo 7 cuz it was a better daily driver ...the evo did have better performance but wasnt a good daily driver
edit:wr to wrx
Old May 6, 2003 | 05:27 AM
  #28  
Greystar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 27
Originally posted by awns729
im not sure but i think sport compact said both were 14 flat...hmm...
That right there should tell you those numbers from SC are WAY off. They don't jive with real world results nor the outputs of both vehicles. Of course maybe they had something like a 2.5 60' time on the runs for both vehicles .
Old May 8, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #29  
t-wrexxx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 433
From: www.tristatetuners.com
Car Info: www.tristatetuners.com
Not sure if this is true, but I also heard that the STI has to shift an extra time during the quarter because of the shorter gearing of the six speed.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 AM.