downflow vs crossflow?
downflow vs crossflow?
I was talking to one of the salesmen at my local subaru dealer and he said that the new 2005 legacy gt and outback xt have whats called a downflow intercooler vs the WRX's and STi's crossflow intercooler. he claims that the downflow design is like 20 or 30% more efficient then the current crossflow designs and that Subaru is even thinking about putting the new intercoolers in the STi and like. Is this true or was he feeding me a line?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
Originally Posted by ScoobySTi07
I was talking to one of the salesmen at my local subaru dealer and he said that the new 2005 legacy gt and outback xt have whats called a downflow intercooler vs the WRX's and STi's crossflow intercooler. he claims that the downflow design is like 20 or 30% more efficient then the current crossflow designs and that Subaru is even thinking about putting the new intercoolers in the STi and like. Is this true or was he feeding me a line?
Crossflow piping style (notice how it flows side to side)

Downflow (notice the top to bottom design)
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Subaru topmounts are already downflow designs. Basically you want the end tanks to be as long as possible and the distance the air travels through the intercooler to be short. I don't see where they are able to improve on the existing ICs.
from what i could see (the new legacies have a stupid dress up covering thing over the top of the engine and intercooler) when we popped the hood the intake came from the side and around to the top of the intercooler. the intercooler had vetical bars then dumped into the engine (refer to ghetto picture below). I maybe wrong in that the air may come in from the side and not the top but everything else is right. in a day or two I'll get somebody with the new legacy to post a picture of the engine bay without the cover thing on.
hey quit ragging on my drawing. Even if it is ghetto (which it deffinitely is) it serves its purpose and gets the point across. besides StrykerSTi should be posting a pick of the engine and intercooler of his new GT soon and then you can look at the real thing instead of my ghetto drawing.
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,723
From: Roseville, CA
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Subaru topmounts are already downflow designs. Basically you want the end tanks to be as long as possible and the distance the air travels through the intercooler to be short. I don't see where they are able to improve on the existing ICs.
Originally Posted by Kostamojen
Well that is what the new LGT one does... Its got larger end tanks, with the turbo directly connecting to the intercooler rather than having the funky Y pipe, and a short distance across but with more fins. Its a much more efficient design IMHO.
Well i guess my dealer was right, maybe for the wrong reasons, but he was right. Maybe when I get one I'll have to do some airflow tests on it to see what benifits it has over the WRX one.
Well StrykerSTi posted some pics of the GT IC for me so you don't have to look at my ghetto drawing anymore. And now with that dress up piece taken off the engine I have absolutely no idea what the hell is going on with the airflow.



