350Z or Impreza WRX
12-20-2006, 11:38 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 3,522
Car Info: 2016 FXT
350Z or Impreza WRX
Okay I’m really having trouble making up my mind. Here is my situation: I can get a good deal on a used 350Z for a little more than 20k. I know the driver and I know the history of the car etc, and it was babied for the >20k miles that were put on it. On the other hand I have always wanted a WRX STi. I cannot afford an STi obviously, and I don’t really feel comfortable buying a used one in that price range because there is a very high chance that the **** was beat out of it. The WRX however is still a car that I would have a lot of fun with. Here are my pros/cons and I know that obviously posting here will be biased but here it goes anyway:
WRX Pros:
-Turbocharged-My last car was N/A and I have always wanted a turbocharged car, and it would be way too expensive and DD unfriendly to turbo the Z
-AWD
-Modding is much, much cheaper and more responsive than the Z
WRX Cons:
-Uglier exterior (stock at least)
-I would have to drop a good amount of money on suspension/brake/tire mods
-Worse interior than the Z in my opinion
350Z Pros:
-Great Suspension/Brakes Stock
-Overall look/appearance
-2 Doors
-Interior
-Stock H.I.D.s (little things…)
350Z Cons:
-Very expensive and minimally useful to mod N/A which means either I wont mod (impossible) or I’ll go broke trying to squeeze out only a few ponies which I will regret in the end (like most of the people who I’ve seen mod their Z N/A do).
In the end it is my decision but since I’m stuck in the middle of the balance beam so to say, hearing a few more pros or cons on either side might help. Thanks.
WRX Pros:
-Turbocharged-My last car was N/A and I have always wanted a turbocharged car, and it would be way too expensive and DD unfriendly to turbo the Z
-AWD
-Modding is much, much cheaper and more responsive than the Z
WRX Cons:
-Uglier exterior (stock at least)
-I would have to drop a good amount of money on suspension/brake/tire mods
-Worse interior than the Z in my opinion
350Z Pros:
-Great Suspension/Brakes Stock
-Overall look/appearance
-2 Doors
-Interior
-Stock H.I.D.s (little things…)
350Z Cons:
-Very expensive and minimally useful to mod N/A which means either I wont mod (impossible) or I’ll go broke trying to squeeze out only a few ponies which I will regret in the end (like most of the people who I’ve seen mod their Z N/A do).
In the end it is my decision but since I’m stuck in the middle of the balance beam so to say, hearing a few more pros or cons on either side might help. Thanks.
Last edited by NorCalDC5; 12-21-2006 at 02:56 AM.
12-20-2006, 11:44 AM
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: My lugnuts require more torque then your Honda makes
Posts: 1,404
Car Info: 05 WRX
I had a chance to drove the Z for the weekend.
Cons:
-no power or torque
-didn't really care for the plastic interior on the doors
-blind spots, need to heavily rely on the mirrors
Pros:
-does look nicer exterior wise
-girls seem to check it out
Cons:
-no power or torque
-didn't really care for the plastic interior on the doors
-blind spots, need to heavily rely on the mirrors
Pros:
-does look nicer exterior wise
-girls seem to check it out
12-20-2006, 11:55 AM
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 3,522
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Originally Posted by RedStage
305Z Cons
- NO Trunk space
- 2 Doors
- NO Trunk space
- 2 Doors
Originally Posted by gqchynaboy
I had a chance to drove the Z for the weekend.
Cons:
-no power or torque
-didn't really care for the plastic interior on the doors
-blind spots, need to heavily rely on the mirrors
Pros:
-does look nicer exterior wise
-girls seem to check it out
Cons:
-no power or torque
-didn't really care for the plastic interior on the doors
-blind spots, need to heavily rely on the mirrors
Pros:
-does look nicer exterior wise
-girls seem to check it out
Also it has much more power and torque than the wrx when its not in boost..im not used to being able to accelerate in 5th gear at 2.5k rpms on the freeway
12-20-2006, 01:11 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Posts: 5,686
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
You seem to have your heart set on the Z, but you're disapointed in the expensive power gains. It also seems that you're souly looking into a WRX because of it's tuning potential because you don't care for its appearance inside or out.
I came from a Z32TT and I can tell you that the quality and tuning potential of the Z33 went down. The Z33 drops the turbo power and the nice interior. It retained a stylish look (that took about 2 years to grow on me) and improved it's pedigree as a well balanced sports car.
The WRX... what hasen't been said about it? I would have to disagree on your idea of dropping lots of money into the suspension. I'm running on stock everything and some KDWS tires on my bugeye and I'm very content with it. Unless you plan on some track duty, the stock set-up is plenty good for daily driving. Even up mountain roads the understeer only comes out when I push it hard. I hear a new rear sway bar will neutralize most of that. The AWD allows you to basically force the car around a corner. AWD is very forgiving for unskilled drivers like myself. Screwing up with AWD is like screwing up on google. When you scew up entering a corner for instance, the car says "Did you mean: this?"
Take what you want from that. Spending $20K is always a hard decision.
I came from a Z32TT and I can tell you that the quality and tuning potential of the Z33 went down. The Z33 drops the turbo power and the nice interior. It retained a stylish look (that took about 2 years to grow on me) and improved it's pedigree as a well balanced sports car.
The WRX... what hasen't been said about it? I would have to disagree on your idea of dropping lots of money into the suspension. I'm running on stock everything and some KDWS tires on my bugeye and I'm very content with it. Unless you plan on some track duty, the stock set-up is plenty good for daily driving. Even up mountain roads the understeer only comes out when I push it hard. I hear a new rear sway bar will neutralize most of that. The AWD allows you to basically force the car around a corner. AWD is very forgiving for unskilled drivers like myself. Screwing up with AWD is like screwing up on google. When you scew up entering a corner for instance, the car says "Did you mean: this?"
Take what you want from that. Spending $20K is always a hard decision.
12-20-2006, 01:17 PM
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Novato,CA
Posts: 881
Car Info: Jaguar XJR, VW Corrado, 911 Carrera
I work for Nissan and drive Z's on a daily basis and I have to say I am not impressed with them at all but a STOCK WRX isn't great either. A few mods here and there make the WRX a very capable sports car. For daily driving obviously the WRX is much more practical and it seems you know that the aftermarket department is much more forgiving with a WRX. It sounds like a WRX is more suitable for you, especially if you plan on modding it as well as driving it everyday.
12-20-2006, 01:25 PM
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 3,522
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Originally Posted by 1sicwrx
I work for Nissan and drive Z's on a daily basis and I have to say I am not impressed with them at all but a STOCK WRX isn't great either. A few mods here and there make the WRX a very capable sports car. For daily driving obviously the WRX is much more practical and it seems you know that the aftermarket department is much more forgiving with a WRX. It sounds like a WRX is more suitable for you, especially if you plan on modding it as well as driving it everyday.
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
You seem to have your heart set on the Z, but you're disapointed in the expensive power gains. It also seems that you're souly looking into a WRX because of it's tuning potential because you don't care for its appearance inside or out.
I came from a Z32TT and I can tell you that the quality and tuning potential of the Z33 went down. The Z33 drops the turbo power and the nice interior. It retained a stylish look (that took about 2 years to grow on me) and improved it's pedigree as a well balanced sports car.
The WRX... what hasen't been said about it? I would have to disagree on your idea of dropping lots of money into the suspension. I'm running on stock everything and some KDWS tires on my bugeye and I'm very content with it. Unless you plan on some track duty, the stock set-up is plenty good for daily driving. Even up mountain roads the understeer only comes out when I push it hard. I hear a new rear sway bar will neutralize most of that. The AWD allows you to basically force the car around a corner. AWD is very forgiving for unskilled drivers like myself. Screwing up with AWD is like screwing up on google. When you scew up entering a corner for instance, the car says "Did you mean: this?"
Take what you want from that. Spending $20K is always a hard decision.
I came from a Z32TT and I can tell you that the quality and tuning potential of the Z33 went down. The Z33 drops the turbo power and the nice interior. It retained a stylish look (that took about 2 years to grow on me) and improved it's pedigree as a well balanced sports car.
The WRX... what hasen't been said about it? I would have to disagree on your idea of dropping lots of money into the suspension. I'm running on stock everything and some KDWS tires on my bugeye and I'm very content with it. Unless you plan on some track duty, the stock set-up is plenty good for daily driving. Even up mountain roads the understeer only comes out when I push it hard. I hear a new rear sway bar will neutralize most of that. The AWD allows you to basically force the car around a corner. AWD is very forgiving for unskilled drivers like myself. Screwing up with AWD is like screwing up on google. When you scew up entering a corner for instance, the car says "Did you mean: this?"
Take what you want from that. Spending $20K is always a hard decision.
Thanks, both of you.
12-20-2006, 02:02 PM
#8
Will you be driving in any type of condition(Other than 100% Tarmac of course) at any time of the year where AWD will be a FACTOR? will you need the back seat? the extra 2 doors? the trunk space?
you can mod the Z but eventually you will still be wanting/wishing you had a Turbo car right outta the BOX...
you can mod the Z but eventually you will still be wanting/wishing you had a Turbo car right outta the BOX...
12-21-2006, 07:27 AM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tracy, NORCAL
Posts: 841
Car Info: '06 CGM STI
Superglue WRX said: When you scew up entering a corner for instance, the car says "Did you mean: this?"
Amen brother...amen. AWD FTW!!!
(Get the WRX dude. 4 doors > 2 doors)
Amen brother...amen. AWD FTW!!!
(Get the WRX dude. 4 doors > 2 doors)
01-10-2007, 12:20 PM
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
Originally Posted by RedStage
305Z Cons
- NO Trunk space
- 2 Doors
- NO Trunk space
- 2 Doors
The con of the 350z is that everybody and their mother has one and its cousin the G35. I'd rather have an Evo or an Sti and I'll keep my dads 240Z. (for a bit of old skool)
Ubar Ru.
01-11-2007, 09:03 AM
#14
Originally Posted by samurai
tbh, not a real Z enthusiast if you believe thats a con tbh..
The con of the 350z is that everybody and their mother has one and its cousin the G35. I'd rather have an Evo or an Sti and I'll keep my dads 240Z. (for a bit of old skool)
The con of the 350z is that everybody and their mother has one and its cousin the G35. I'd rather have an Evo or an Sti and I'll keep my dads 240Z. (for a bit of old skool)
g35>wrx>z