who are you voting for?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 1,828
Car Info: nothing
who are you voting for?
clinton?
obama?
Mccain?
I'm 85% obama right now
15% Mccain
-100000% for clinton
Obama is the only one that can get us out of the war(the war is costing us 200million a day!) and i think he can turn America around and make it respectable again, toooo many countries hate us right now! Thanks bush!
your thoughts?
obama?
Mccain?
I'm 85% obama right now
15% Mccain
-100000% for clinton
Obama is the only one that can get us out of the war(the war is costing us 200million a day!) and i think he can turn America around and make it respectable again, toooo many countries hate us right now! Thanks bush!
your thoughts?
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 1,828
Car Info: nothing
1. She is nakedly and unabashedly ambitious.
She seems willing to do virtually anything to get ahead.
For example!!!!! sticking with Bill because it enhanced her chances for higher office even though she appeared to have little affection for him. Moving to NY to become a Senator. Losing/hiding/finding Rose Law Firm files. The list could be far longer, but some of you have heard it befor
2. She does not appear to have a world view grounded in a particular philosophy or moral system other than expediency.
3. She is bright and capable which is particularly dangerous when combined with 1 and 2 above.
She isn't loathed because she is a woman or a Clinton. She is loathed because she is perceived as amoral, Machiavellian, and dangerous for America.
She seems willing to do virtually anything to get ahead.
For example!!!!! sticking with Bill because it enhanced her chances for higher office even though she appeared to have little affection for him. Moving to NY to become a Senator. Losing/hiding/finding Rose Law Firm files. The list could be far longer, but some of you have heard it befor
2. She does not appear to have a world view grounded in a particular philosophy or moral system other than expediency.
3. She is bright and capable which is particularly dangerous when combined with 1 and 2 above.
She isn't loathed because she is a woman or a Clinton. She is loathed because she is perceived as amoral, Machiavellian, and dangerous for America.
#8
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Why the **** is
Posts: 5,312
Car Info: this required information?
I don't really watch any of the election stuff, but why is everyone saying Obama can get us out of the war? What can he do better then anyone else? Another thing I noticed, do you think anyone will really elect someone with the middle name "Hussein" who went to a muslim school? especially in a time like this with what is going on overseas...
Last edited by blue blurr; 01-09-2008 at 12:33 PM.
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 1,828
Car Info: nothing
Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.
#10
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Why the **** is
Posts: 5,312
Car Info: this required information?
Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern Bay Area: Larkspur
Posts: 1,004
Car Info: 02 Silver WRX sedan. Eibach springs, Blitz NUR cat back, Rota 17" Attacks, Cobb AccessPort/DP
Ha ha haaaaaa, wow.
Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.
And if you believe that I have some beach front property I'd like to sell you. In any case, the "war" is technically over. It's a police action now. I'm just going to throw this out there: No matter who gets elected, we will always and forever be in the middle east. Don't let the politicians fool you. They all knew our presence over there was inevitable, especially after Carter. Anyway, right now I'd vote for the person that isn't promising EVERYTHING to EVERYONE.
Finally, and statistically speaking (not that anyone cares), it's safer and cheaper for Americans to serve in Iraq than it is to drive on Ca. highways....lol.
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 299
Car Info: 06 WRB WRX Wagon Limited Edition
Obama was one of the ones that really stood up against the war in the first place. I also do not like Clinton at all. There is a clip somewhere, where she changes the way she talks when she travels around the country. I don't appreciate fake people and I guess you can't expect that much from a politician. My dislike for her has nothing to do with her being a woman, but just the fact that she will do anything to get into office. Clinton also took a lot of donation money from the pharmaceutical companies. I know that I don't enjoy paying more every year for health insurance because of the rising cost of pharmaceuticals.