Are terrorists better off now, or before Bush took office? =)

Who do you think they would want to win the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election?

 

i think they like Bush

 

Nader

 

slippery slope into more political debauchery...

i dont to jack my friday

 

Are you referring to the ones he already introduced to Allah, or the ones that are still alive and respect him for his strength?

 

terrors best bed fellow is bush, who else would have been able to make recruitment so damn easy?

 

So you think they want him to win the next election?

 

So you don't like the president's policy?

I think http://www.stickdeath.com/ has it right... see "meet the talibans" and "martyr machine." I think they sum up our domestic policy.

 

I think they want Bush in power for the same reasons they want Sharon in power. Both thrive on war, and that is what these radicals want. War divides and elicits emotional responses from both sides, which leads to bad decisions.

 

I don't agree. I think they thought the U.S. in general had been feminized. I think they thought that we wouldn't increase our efforts in the region... I think they thought we'd take a softer approach there, and pull out in many cases.

In my opinion, Bush is their worst nightmare. The terrorists counted on divisions within our country limiting his actions... Bush doesn't give a ratts *** what the pacifists think.

 

their worst nightmare would be a president who could speak english properly, a president who wasnt hell bent on destroying nation states, a president who didnt feed their propagande machine by sending troops into places to settle civil disputes. That would be their nightmare, a nightmare where they couldnt point ot the actions of an administration who is as corrupt as the relgious muslim figures who are attempting to wrestle for power in iraq right now...

 

OBL, duh

 

...