Time Slips for my 12.282 @ 112.5mph stock vf39 06 STi
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,405
From: California Love
Car Info: Big Thanks Jeremy@CrucialRacing and Ed@EQ-Tuning
Time Slips for my 12.282 @ 112.5mph stock vf39 06 STi
so yea i took my car to the track again..
november 1 2006 on sacramento raceway
best run.
12.282 @ 112.5mph
with slow 1.74 60s
my mod list.
- accessport for 06 STi
- mbc
- hks carbon ti catback
- Crucial Racing ceramic coated Full downpipe (racepipew/dp)
- Crucial Racing coated and ported stock headers
- TUNED by Ed (mastermind) EQ Tuning
- everything else is stock
heres time slip
my take on this run
i was basicly not having my good runs
my 60 footer sucks 1.75 sucks to me becuz i average mid - high 1.6 with my best 1.615
this run didnt feel fast at all
when i launch it was decent
and shifted kinda slow becuz trying to get a feel for it
but i was stun by 12.2 run
i know with better 60s and my crazy shifting
this car go 12 flat
i will hit the track again by the end of the month
my old times was 12.434
with semilar setup
perrin down pipe, pnp stock headers by Crucial, gm 3 port boost soleniod and tuned 97 by ed @ Eq
Tuning
all i did new was put Cruial racing full downpipe
which def helps for temp car feels more responsive with cruial dp
thank you list
- Ed (mastermind) EQ Tuning very good tuning job. nice guy too would highly vouch his skills, thats why i call him mastermind haha, take a bow ed this was all you
-Crucial Racing to Jeremy @ crucial for taking care of the parts, i also highly vouch for this man, crucial has very good quality products best i have seen , crucial downpipe and pnp oem header is insane btw, cant wait to spend more money on crucial parts
- Speedelement/mpj good guys i also vouch for them
- mcdrama
- charlie
- earl
- bluestinger
- gilmore25
- to many people i know on i club
and my homies that is not on this club
november 1 2006 on sacramento raceway
best run.
12.282 @ 112.5mph
with slow 1.74 60s
my mod list.
- accessport for 06 STi
- mbc
- hks carbon ti catback
- Crucial Racing ceramic coated Full downpipe (racepipew/dp)
- Crucial Racing coated and ported stock headers
- TUNED by Ed (mastermind) EQ Tuning
- everything else is stock
heres time slip
my take on this run
i was basicly not having my good runs
my 60 footer sucks 1.75 sucks to me becuz i average mid - high 1.6 with my best 1.615
this run didnt feel fast at all
when i launch it was decent
and shifted kinda slow becuz trying to get a feel for it
but i was stun by 12.2 run
i know with better 60s and my crazy shifting
this car go 12 flat
i will hit the track again by the end of the month
my old times was 12.434
with semilar setup
perrin down pipe, pnp stock headers by Crucial, gm 3 port boost soleniod and tuned 97 by ed @ Eq
Tuning
all i did new was put Cruial racing full downpipe
which def helps for temp car feels more responsive with cruial dp
thank you list
- Ed (mastermind) EQ Tuning very good tuning job. nice guy too would highly vouch his skills, thats why i call him mastermind haha, take a bow ed this was all you
-Crucial Racing to Jeremy @ crucial for taking care of the parts, i also highly vouch for this man, crucial has very good quality products best i have seen , crucial downpipe and pnp oem header is insane btw, cant wait to spend more money on crucial parts
- Speedelement/mpj good guys i also vouch for them
- mcdrama
- charlie
- earl
- bluestinger
- gilmore25
- to many people i know on i club
and my homies that is not on this club
Last edited by downsti; Nov 7, 2006 at 03:14 AM.
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
great time Sean... I can't wait to see what you can do with that beast once you can actually power shift 
(hey your were asking for it :P)
On the honest side..these are some real good times for a stock turbo car with a ton of mods or just alittle, like in this case.
Last edited by MARKSTI; Nov 7, 2006 at 11:40 AM.
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,094
From: bay area, ca
Car Info: 2006 STi 2012 STi
awww man....here i was just enjoying the stock 06 sti 13.5 1/4 and then....I READ THIS! argh.....ive been avoiding mods....and this thread does NOT make it easy 
congrats on the times tho.! good job
congrats on the times tho.!
good job
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,405
From: California Love
Car Info: Big Thanks Jeremy@CrucialRacing and Ed@EQ-Tuning
i ran 13.2 stock @ 103 mph
with 106 degree sti temp reading
3 other pass 13.2 with same plus 100 f
his at 45 f weather
with 106 degree sti temp reading
3 other pass 13.2 with same plus 100 f
his at 45 f weather
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,405
From: California Love
Car Info: Big Thanks Jeremy@CrucialRacing and Ed@EQ-Tuning
rumors is rumors
infineon is colder temp , better traction , but less runs
sac track is not prep well but gets more chances
more chances getting fast time
people sac sac is slower
people say infineon slower
infineon is colder temp , better traction , but less runs
sac track is not prep well but gets more chances
more chances getting fast time
people sac sac is slower
people say infineon slower
Originally Posted by downsti
i ran 13.2 stock @ 103 mph
with 106 degree sti temp reading
3 other pass 13.2 with same plus 100 f
his at 45 f weather
with 106 degree sti temp reading
3 other pass 13.2 with same plus 100 f
his at 45 f weather
most say infineon is slower due to it being slightly uphill
Originally Posted by 1neWRX
for those that have ran at both sac and infineon is there really a big difference in times? i hear sac gets faster times.
If prepped right Sacramento is just slighty faster, not much tho...maybe .1
As said before..at Sac you tend to get alot more runs which helps you sort out the car and get faster as the night/day progress.
A few weeks ago i went out in my Mustang and got 17-18 1/4 passes and i parked ther car for atleast half the night.
Some other guy got 40-50 1/4mile passes, gotta love it LOL.