Subaru expanding...

Old May 8, 2013 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
OneManArmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Subaru expanding...

Subaru invests $400 million in Indiana plant


That's cool. It'll mean they can produce more of the baseline cars and expand those lines. I'm not sure if it means anything for the sti/wrx platform since those are still made in Japan...
Old May 8, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
queeg9k's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,849
From: Cheesesteakville
Car Info: 05 wrx wagon, 90 celica alltrac, 66 mustang
Woot!
Old May 8, 2013 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
dozenutts's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 520
From: Suisun
Car Info: 2005 STI (sold), 2013 STI, 2014 BURRZ
Nice to see Subaru continuing to grow.
Old May 8, 2013 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
OneManArmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by dozenutts
Nice to see Subaru continuing to grow.
Yeah. I think for the basic consumer they've made a lot of the right choices. It'd be nice to see them bring the diesel program over and possibly another true compact car like the justy.

I'd like to see them continue to grow that here and return the STI/WRX back to where it belongs... a true budget rally/road smasher. Let the legacy platform have all the fancy heavy stuff. STI/WRX... lighter.. simpler... faster. Period.
Old May 8, 2013 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
Snoopy408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,624
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2001 Acura TL - 2016.5 Mazda CX-5
^well put.
Its nice to see companies bring manufacturing back to the US!
Old May 8, 2013 | 10:39 AM
  #6  
oshrizak's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,911
From: Orinda/Palo Alto/Los Altos
Car Info: Subaru STi Sedan '13
Originally Posted by Snoopy408
^well put.
Its nice to see companies bring manufacturing back to the US!
Agreed.. I had a discussion about this in class the other day and it seems that its starting to happen slowly.
Old May 8, 2013 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
OneManArmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by oshrizak
Agreed.. I had a discussion about this in class the other day and it seems that its starting to happen slowly.
Yes. It's nice to see more and more companies realize that the easy route isn't always the best route.

We have spent the last 20 years outsourcing more and more production to countries like India, China and Denmark. Outsourcing more tech jobs and phone type jobs to places like Jamaica, the Philippines and... well... India.

For the upper end people and the stock holders it makes sense. You want to see revenues go up in order to make your stock value go up. When things slow down for these big companies the way they make their revenue go up is by cutting corners... lowering quality, outsourcing jobs and piling less people with more work. Sooner or later that comes back around to bite you in the butt.

Less jobs means less people spending money. Less people spending money means less people buying your products. Lower quality means more returns and redos.

Then you toss in the increased cost of fossil fuels and it's getting more and more expensive to ship stuff from china to the U.S. and back and forth. And they're wanting more money for what they're providing. All in all that makes the margins smaller and makes it more reasonable to keep it in the states.

Without local support, local jobs there's just no internal support. People can't live on welfare alone and that includes the 1%. Their money is our money. If we don't have money to spend they don't have money to make.

I honestly don't understand how we as a government haven't started to tax companies for outsourcing, tax chinese and other goods more to equalize prices and make agreements... you want to export chinese good... then import US good to china. We don't do that. It's stupid.

It's like trading Lebron James to another team and asking for a hot dog in exchange.
Old May 8, 2013 | 11:10 AM
  #8  
oshrizak's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,911
From: Orinda/Palo Alto/Los Altos
Car Info: Subaru STi Sedan '13
Originally Posted by OneManArmy
Yes. It's nice to see more and more companies realize that the easy route isn't always the best route.

We have spent the last 20 years outsourcing more and more production to countries like India, China and Denmark. Outsourcing more tech jobs and phone type jobs to places like Jamaica, the Philippines and... well... India.

For the upper end people and the stock holders it makes sense. You want to see revenues go up in order to make your stock value go up. When things slow down for these big companies the way they make their revenue go up is by cutting corners... lowering quality, outsourcing jobs and piling less people with more work. Sooner or later that comes back around to bite you in the butt.

Less jobs means less people spending money. Less people spending money means less people buying your products. Lower quality means more returns and redos.

Then you toss in the increased cost of fossil fuels and it's getting more and more expensive to ship stuff from china to the U.S. and back and forth. And they're wanting more money for what they're providing. All in all that makes the margins smaller and makes it more reasonable to keep it in the states.

Without local support, local jobs there's just no internal support. People can't live on welfare alone and that includes the 1%. Their money is our money. If we don't have money to spend they don't have money to make.

I honestly don't understand how we as a government haven't started to tax companies for outsourcing, tax chinese and other goods more to equalize prices and make agreements... you want to export chinese good... then import US good to china. We don't do that. It's stupid.

It's like trading Lebron James to another team and asking for a hot dog in exchange.
+1 very well put. Hopefully we can reach back to the 1950's-1970's were we actually manufactured stuff here and kept a stable economy. For me in short I think its great that Subaru is coming to USA and although they will most likely just be producing base models its a start. The car industry in America is slowly coming back after a huge decline with all those companies going bankrupt

Good luck to SOA
Old May 8, 2013 | 11:45 AM
  #9  
chicagozer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 130
From: Foster City, CA
Car Info: 1999 Legacy Brighton
Fuji Heavy Industry stock has been on a tear the past three years.

Old May 8, 2013 | 12:07 PM
  #10  
OneManArmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
The new forester made them a LOT of money.
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Wow, good for Subaru.
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by OneManArmy
Yeah. I think for the basic consumer they've made a lot of the right choices. It'd be nice to see them bring the diesel program over and possibly another true compact car like the justy.

I'd like to see them continue to grow that here and return the STI/WRX back to where it belongs... a true budget rally/road smasher. Let the legacy platform have all the fancy heavy stuff. STI/WRX... lighter.. simpler... faster. Period.
I know it would never happen, but I dream of a tiny compact, sort of a combination of a Justy and a Starlet, powered by a small (say 1.6L) boxer motor, and RWD. I don't know why companies don't just try something like that. If Subaru made a basic, fairly econo (like, no luxury crap) hatchback that came in 2 and 4 doors, simple as simple, RWD so the engine could be set back farther in the chassis for better packaging and crash handling, my thought is that it would be a serious contender for a future classic, while still meeting the needs of the "masses" that would be required to make the car a viable possibility for the automaker.

Probably the best thing would be a car that had an engine bay that could accomodate the traditional longitudinal boxer for RWD, but also a transverse inline for FWD versions. That would be hard, but doable.

Truth is, the biggest challenge these days in making a small, light, compact car is safety regulations. My 1991 Justy would not even come close to passing today's requirements, in any aspect of automotive testing.

Last edited by wombatsauce; May 8, 2013 at 12:41 PM.
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:46 PM
  #13  
CHESTON's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,478
From: Campbell
Car Info: AW Pig-STI
Good to see them succeeding and then reinvesting in one its major marketplaces. Hopefully it all goes thru even tho the yen has gotten weaker recently. I'm sure the recent strength of the yen led to their decision to invest overseas (meaning not in Japan).
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #14  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
I know it would never happen, but I dream of a tiny compact, sort of a combination of a Justy and a Starlet, RWD, powered by a small (say 1.6L) boxer motor, and RWD. I don't know why companies don't just try something like that. If Subaru made a basic, fairly econo (like, no luxury crap) hatchback that came in 2 and 4 doors, simple as simple, RWD so the engine could be set back farther in the chassis for better packaging and crash handling, my thought is that it would be a serious contender for a future classic, while still meeting the needs of the "masses" that would be required to make the car a viable possibility for the automaker.

Truth is, the biggest challenge these days in making a small, light, compact car is safety regulations. My 1991 Justy would not even come close to passing today's requirements, in any aspect of automotive testing.
I could possibly see Subaru bringing over a 1.6L turbo eventually. But I agree that making a small, compact, and truly lightweight car would be really difficult due to current/future safety regulations without costing $$$.
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:57 PM
  #15  
w0ng3r's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,856
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2011 WRX Sedan
Originally Posted by OneManArmy
The new forester made them a LOT of money.
Hopefully they don't divert all their RND money towards their better selling cars D:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM.