Spring Choices....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #16  
DeadSTick's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 304
From: South Bay
Car Info: 04 STI
Espelir GT springs are incredible. Take a look at them for a perfect drop and performance benefits. Install these and while you are at it max out your front camber and bye, bye understeer.
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #17  
DeadSTick's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 304
From: South Bay
Car Info: 04 STI
Oh yeah, and don't forget to cut your front bumpstops when you install the new springs.
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #18  
ldivinag's Avatar
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by soggynoodles
Honestly, the stock STi setup is pretty solid. IMO. Get some sways.
that is until you get the infamous STi squeek or is it thump, on the driver's side rear strut...

and SOA wont fix it...:bananen_smilies072:
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #19  
andyf's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 410
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2012 Mazda 3 Hatch
I have the pinks and love them. The other two choices are solid also. Throw some sways into the mix and you'll have a canyon carving demon.
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #20  
Jewbaru's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 988
From: Sacramento
Car Info: 05 STi
I'm personally gonna go with swifts.
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #21  
soggynoodles's Avatar
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
I had a set of swifts on my 05 STi and the rear was waaaayyy lower then the front. Dunno why that was. The website said 1.4 all the way around but the thing i noticed where that the 04 STi springs were the same model number as the 05's

I dumped them and got coilovers

Last edited by soggynoodles; May 3, 2007 at 06:30 PM.
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
x002x's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,805
From: hella norcal
Car Info: 2021 Ascent
Originally Posted by Zoeb2s
swift ftw

+1 for swifts!
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #23  
soggynoodles's Avatar
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by kellymabbott
Alright, so I want to get springs and lower my limited STi most likely for mountain/twisties right now. Eventually I'd like to run it on the track, but for now I just want to have some more fun with my car on weekend drives. Here are the choices, so PLEASE share your opinions with me:

(1) JDM pinks (not much lowering?)
(2) Prodrive (lowered about 1 inch)
(3) Swift (1" in the front and 1/2-3/4" in the rear)

Thanks guys!! -Kelly :-)

On the swift springs the website says 1.2 rear 1.2 front for the 05+ STi
Those numbers were for the 04's

http://www.swiftsprings.com/products-sport_springs.html
Not saying that they are bad, i know 2 wagon owners who are happy with swift springs.
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #24  
soggynoodles's Avatar
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by ldivinag
that is until you get the infamous STi squeek or is it thump, on the driver's side rear strut...

and SOA wont fix it...:bananen_smilies072:

you know i got my stock ones replaced at Livermore subaru. didn't give me any grief or anything. Dropped the car off and picked it up the next day.

the car had stock suspension with a tbe.
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #25  
CreoWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 478
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: '08 FSXT (Aspen White)
Originally Posted by soggynoodles
I had a set of swifts on my 05 STi and the rear was waaaayyy lower then the front. Dunno why that was. The website said 1.4 all the way around but the thing i noticed where that the 04 STi springs were the same model number as the 05's
The wheel arches aren't cut out evenly front/rear. The rear is always going to look lower for springs that lower equally all the way around, because the rear arches aren't cut out as high.

-Mike-
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #26  
ldivinag's Avatar
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by soggynoodles
you know i got my stock ones replaced at Livermore subaru. didn't give me any grief or anything. Dropped the car off and picked it up the next day.

the car had stock suspension with a tbe.

were you still within the warranty period?

is it part of the drivetrain? lol...
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #27  
soggynoodles's Avatar
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by ldivinag
were you still within the warranty period?

is it part of the drivetrain? lol...
lol i only had at the time 6k on the car so ya i was.

I've read stories about dealers trying to pull that crap though. :\
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
resident smurf's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,952
From: Pleasanton, CA
Car Info: a prius, a miata, & 2 m3's
I vote keeping it stock, going along with your plans to track your car, and then deciding where you want to go from there.

I was planning on modding my STi with coilovers and other mods and then I ended up getting really into the track thing and ended up buying a dedicated car for the track. I'm glad I left my Subaru reasonably stock because it this way it's more civil and a better daily driver.

IMO, you can track your daily for fun, but a car can't be both a "daily driver" and track car once you start pushing it to the level where you need to actually MOD the car to change its behavior on the track...

If you want to just get springs though, I recommend the Racecomp Engieering springs as someone else has mentioned earlier in the thread... either that or Swifts/Prodrives. Remember, even for a track/mountain road setup, you want a good degree of suspension travel to soak up bumps. Stiffer and lower isn't necessarily always better- I think the stock setup is almost IDEAL for bumpier roads like Mt. Hamilton/Mines.
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #29  
soggynoodles's Avatar
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by CreoWRX
The wheel arches aren't cut out evenly front/rear. The rear is always going to look lower for springs that lower equally all the way around, because the rear arches aren't cut out as high.

-Mike-

interesting. :character00279:
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #30  
ldivinag's Avatar
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by resident smurf
I vote keeping it stock, going along with your plans to track your car, and then deciding where you want to go from there.
wouldnt getting a diff set of tires on light(er) rims be a better ticket?

tires that are made for track duties????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 PM.