so it finally happened... (ticket to see State Ref)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2004, 08:03 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
stimul8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
Monkey, where can you get that piece of paper that states 20% is legal?
stimul8n is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 08:23 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
Monkeynutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 238
Car Info: 2002 WRX
Wow I could be wrong.

Here it says 70% in front and any% in rear http://www.tintdude.com/atoh.html

Here it just says it can be installed http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26708_5.htm

Here "sunscreening devices" can't be more than 35% http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26708_2.htm (I know that's not tint)

This is probably what you want http://www.iwfa.com/iwfa/Law_Chart/S...aw%20Chart.htm

chart of all states, including CA, looks like 70% again. I could swear my friend said 20, but that was a few years ago. http://www.iwfa.com/iwfa/Law_Chart/S...aw%20Chart.htm

I love what the CHP site says

Can I put after-market tinting on the windows of my vehicle?

The main requirements for legal window tinting in California are:


"The windshield and front driver's side and passenger's side windows cannot receive any aftermarket tinting.
If the rear window of a vehicle is tinted, the vehicle must have outside rearview mirrors on both sides.

The law prohibits any person from driving any motor vehicle with any object or material placed, displayed, installed, affixed, or applied upon the windshield or side or rear windows, with certain limited exceptions.

However, legislation signed into law effective January 1, 1999, exempts from the above prohibition specified clear, colorless, and transparent material that is installed, affixed, or applied to the front driver and passenger side windows for the specific purpose of reducing ultraviolet rays. If, as, or when this material becomes torn, bubbled or otherwise worn, it must be removed or replaced."

They first say no, then yes lmao
Monkeynutz is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 08:23 AM
  #63  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
hatchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: North West
Posts: 486
Car Info: 2004 USDM STI
Its on the same page as the legal FMIC.
hatchy is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 08:49 AM
  #64  
Registered User
 
stimul8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
hatchy, state ref approved the guys car twice, the FMIC i totally believe...

the 20% no way in hell...
stimul8n is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 09:08 AM
  #65  
Registered User
 
Monkeynutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 238
Car Info: 2002 WRX
right there on the chart it says 70% is legal... so I don't see why 20% wouldn't be.
Monkeynutz is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 09:15 AM
  #66  
Registered User
 
stimul8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
monkey, the percentage on tints means the amount of light let in, so 70% is much lighter than 20%

hence 20 would be 50% too dark...
stimul8n is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 09:27 AM
  #67  
Registered User
 
Monkeynutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 238
Car Info: 2002 WRX
I was thinking in terms of how dark the tint was... so yeah, 70% is to much (the way I was thinking, which was wrong)

My friends was fairly light in color, but was still tinted, so when he said 20%, that's how I looked at it.

By the law chart there, if "70%" is allowed, then 30% is allowed in the way I looked at it.

ok, does that sound confusing or what?
Monkeynutz is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 08:23 PM
  #68  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WyldKardzWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 296
Car Info: 2002 Aspen White Wrx Wagon
Originally Posted by hatchy
Was it CHP or Hayward's finest?
it was hayward's finest. it looks like i am leaning towards just paying the fine. f*ck doing the stock convertion...

pete
WyldKardzWRX is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 09:12 PM
  #69  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
titsataki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Nutmeg State
Posts: 513
Car Info: 05 Impreza CGM
Originally Posted by WyldKardzWRX
it was hayward's finest. it looks like i am leaning towards just paying the fine. f*ck doing the stock convertion...

pete
Makes sense if you have to pay labor to take off and put it back on it may be cheaper to just pay the fine.

good luck

Nick
titsataki is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 05:51 PM
  #70  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
BADWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kandahar, Afghanistan
Posts: 1,305
Car Info: 09 E90 M3 SEDAN w/DCT
Long time no speak fellas!

In Santa Clara County, you can just pay the uncorrected fine. That is what I did, that is what Freddie did!

Now that I live in LA (Lower Alabama), I have my Evo running with an intake, and a 3" catless exhaust that I bought from Cal, I have no worries about CARB at all. CA can go to hell when it comes to the DMV and CARB!

EVO'S RULE!

Andy

PS: My other vehicle is a Bell 206B3 JetRanger (TH-67 Creek)
BADWRX is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 05:56 PM
  #71  
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
 
Group B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Posts: 4,793
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
Originally Posted by BADWRX
Long time no speak fellas!
holy **** man back from the dead!!!

how's it been Andy?

David (GDA Andy's friend)
Group B is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 06:31 PM
  #72  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
1WRX2NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Posts: 4,962
Car Info: 02 STi
Hey Andy,


I will call you soon!! How you been??

-freddie
1WRX2NV is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 07:58 PM
  #73  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WyldKardzWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 296
Car Info: 2002 Aspen White Wrx Wagon
ok... this is whats on the ticket

CORRECTALBE VIOLATION ........................................MISDEMEANO R OR INFRACTION
no..................27156(b) vc smog violation...........................infraction
no..................27151 vc modified exhaust......................infraction
no..................1-800-622-7733 state referee..........................misdemeanor



x BEFORE A CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward, Ca 94544 on or befroe this date: 10/28/04

is this something i can pay off...

pete

Last edited by WyldKardzWRX; 10-11-2004 at 08:01 PM.
WyldKardzWRX is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 08:07 PM
  #74  
VIP Member
iTrader: (11)
 
AWD 20T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,641
Car Info: 2009 G Ride
Why not just wait until you get a notice in the mail, and go from there?
AWD 20T is offline  
Old 10-11-2004, 10:33 PM
  #75  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
1WRX2NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Posts: 4,962
Car Info: 02 STi
Originally Posted by AWD 20T
Why not just wait until you get a notice in the mail, and go from there?

exactly

I know its hard to wait...I was the same way, asking Andy aka "BADWRX" everyday until the ticket came in the mail...and I was able to do what he said...pay the fine and be done!!

So, you will be able to find out exactly what you can do instead of us confusing you with different info

-freddie
1WRX2NV is offline  


Quick Reply: so it finally happened... (ticket to see State Ref)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 AM.