rallyschool feedback
Originally Posted by bemani
Not really.
Rallyx requires 1 person and road rally needs 2 people, and I also noticed that some cars only have 1 seat. :P
Rallyx requires 1 person and road rally needs 2 people, and I also noticed that some cars only have 1 seat. :P
For the road rally stages people could bring navigators or perhaps it could be arranged to drivers team up on the day and trade off driving and navigating. Shareing a car would make this easier but even using separate car might be possible.
Obviously this would require some thought but it probably could make it work.
I'm not proposing this as a replacement to the Rally X so no issue with single seaters or those that only want the 4 minute thrill. Just a way to make the whole thing more interesting and generate some more interest for road rally.
I believe the Alcan rally has some Rally X stages so I don't think this is a heretical idea.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 176
From: 1999 OBS, 1985 GTI rallycar, 1995 Miata trackcar, 2001 Ford E350 van
Car Info: 1999 OBS
Ok, great. I started this thread, and then wanted to let it run for awhile so I could get feedback without coloring the results.
You all have pretty much confirmed my own opinion: the primary reason people sign up for this is to learn rally driving, and the bits covering all the logistics of entering a performance rally are interesting but secondary. However, the CRS/NASA/RA/(SCCA)/etc still needs to have a school where all the performance rally stuff is taught. Furthermore, the school needs to remain inexpensive, which means limiting it to one day. However, I think we can break them up into two separate events.
I am taking notes, though, and will post back here with some of my ideas after I talk more with Mike and Paula.
You all have pretty much confirmed my own opinion: the primary reason people sign up for this is to learn rally driving, and the bits covering all the logistics of entering a performance rally are interesting but secondary. However, the CRS/NASA/RA/(SCCA)/etc still needs to have a school where all the performance rally stuff is taught. Furthermore, the school needs to remain inexpensive, which means limiting it to one day. However, I think we can break them up into two separate events.
I am taking notes, though, and will post back here with some of my ideas after I talk more with Mike and Paula.
Too bad I was late in getting to this, but it's already been said. I'll just weigh in to agree - I took the school last year, and while nice to get the intro to performance rallying, I was expecting more seat time/hands on instruction. Thought it would be easier than a trip to england (and a few $K) for a driving school! 
Anyway - I decided against attending this year's for exactly the reasons already stated above. Now, had there been more seat time, my saturday would have definitely been spent differently!

Anyway - I decided against attending this year's for exactly the reasons already stated above. Now, had there been more seat time, my saturday would have definitely been spent differently!
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,839
From: Folsom, CA
Car Info: 02 WRX/05 Legacy
Originally Posted by gotwrx
You can have two in the car for RallyX. You could write course notes and run it like a short performance rally with a navigator.
250,000-mile Club President
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by bemani
Which is pointless.....
For some people these events are the only practice or shakedown they get before they enter full on rally races.
It really comes down to where your goals are, if you only worry about winning the Rally-X then your point is valid, but there are other reasons to do this stuff, not everyone has their eyes on the RallyX trophy.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 176
From: 1999 OBS, 1985 GTI rallycar, 1995 Miata trackcar, 2001 Ford E350 van
Car Info: 1999 OBS
So, my idea is to split this up into two one-day schools. The first is a prerequisite for the second, and is strictly a driving school. There's an hour introductory session, and then we go out to the skidpads and work, then more chalktalk, then more skidpad work, and some figure-8 work, then more chalktalk, then the sequence-of-turns. The day finishes with a non-competitive rallycross with instructors riding along. You'd be timed, so you could compare your own runs, but there'd be no overall compendium of times posted.
The second school would be on a different weekend. It'd start out with about 4-5 hours of classroom time, covering much of what's currently covered, but without the driving stuff - maybe only a brief review. The afternoon is spent in a "mini-rally", with real time cards. There's a transit out to a rallycross, you run the rally cross, there's a meandering half-hour transit around the area, then you come back and run the rallycross again (maybe backwards), then there's a transit back to the classroom, where you turn in your timecards. This second classroom session is a short "ok, so what issues did you have?" session, and then you get new timecards (so it mimicks a service), and go back out. Another transit back out to the rallycross (which the rallycross crew has regraded, or perhaps rearranged), another meandering road transit, another run through the rallycross, and a transit back to the classroom for pizza.
This would give people a real feel for what a rally is like, and real-world experience with timecard management, as well as how MTCs, ATCs, and FTCs work. The only problems I can see are getting a proper codriver-to-driver ratio, and that people'd be using their street cars so they'd have to use the street odometer.
As for notes...I'm not sure how useful they'd be in a rallycross. In the scenario for the second school I mentioned above, they might be because you'd never be running the same rallycross course twice, and wouldn't have a chance to see it ahead of time. Also, the course would probably be set up to be a little less tricky, and with a lot of cones, so there'd be little risk of getting lost. In a normal rallycross, you get to examine the track and walk it and should have it memorized by the time you run it.
On a stage, the biggest problems I have with notes are in 1) recognition, and 2) timing. Recognition can be difficult at times; for example if you have a "R5+lg 30 R4" (a long right five-plus, then 30 yards later, a right 4), you can sometimes be left wondering "ok, so...where does the 30 yards start? It looks tighter up ahead, but is that still part of this turn, or is that the R4?". Kinks followed by a 6 also can be difficult to pick up. Stuff like this can't be taught on a rallycross course - part of it just requires practice, and part of it is just getting used to the style of whoever wrote the notes.
The other issue is timing...when do you make the call? This varies from driver to driver, from car to car, and can vary depending on how fast you're going through a particular section of a stage.
The second school would be on a different weekend. It'd start out with about 4-5 hours of classroom time, covering much of what's currently covered, but without the driving stuff - maybe only a brief review. The afternoon is spent in a "mini-rally", with real time cards. There's a transit out to a rallycross, you run the rally cross, there's a meandering half-hour transit around the area, then you come back and run the rallycross again (maybe backwards), then there's a transit back to the classroom, where you turn in your timecards. This second classroom session is a short "ok, so what issues did you have?" session, and then you get new timecards (so it mimicks a service), and go back out. Another transit back out to the rallycross (which the rallycross crew has regraded, or perhaps rearranged), another meandering road transit, another run through the rallycross, and a transit back to the classroom for pizza.
This would give people a real feel for what a rally is like, and real-world experience with timecard management, as well as how MTCs, ATCs, and FTCs work. The only problems I can see are getting a proper codriver-to-driver ratio, and that people'd be using their street cars so they'd have to use the street odometer.
As for notes...I'm not sure how useful they'd be in a rallycross. In the scenario for the second school I mentioned above, they might be because you'd never be running the same rallycross course twice, and wouldn't have a chance to see it ahead of time. Also, the course would probably be set up to be a little less tricky, and with a lot of cones, so there'd be little risk of getting lost. In a normal rallycross, you get to examine the track and walk it and should have it memorized by the time you run it.
On a stage, the biggest problems I have with notes are in 1) recognition, and 2) timing. Recognition can be difficult at times; for example if you have a "R5+lg 30 R4" (a long right five-plus, then 30 yards later, a right 4), you can sometimes be left wondering "ok, so...where does the 30 yards start? It looks tighter up ahead, but is that still part of this turn, or is that the R4?". Kinks followed by a 6 also can be difficult to pick up. Stuff like this can't be taught on a rallycross course - part of it just requires practice, and part of it is just getting used to the style of whoever wrote the notes.
The other issue is timing...when do you make the call? This varies from driver to driver, from car to car, and can vary depending on how fast you're going through a particular section of a stage.
Thats an interesting idea hoche, but also pretty ambitious...
Sounds like alot of time will be spent w/ the extra course setups, 'mini rally' logistics, etc, all while still maintaining a full season rally-x calendar. Will you guys be up for it?
I like the idea personally. Even the mini rally is appealing because it gives me more time to throw the car around between events (practice always helps) but also sounds like two good opportunities for learning...
Sounds like alot of time will be spent w/ the extra course setups, 'mini rally' logistics, etc, all while still maintaining a full season rally-x calendar. Will you guys be up for it?
I like the idea personally. Even the mini rally is appealing because it gives me more time to throw the car around between events (practice always helps) but also sounds like two good opportunities for learning...
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
hoche... sounds MUCH better! much more seat time, but as chindogu said, it might be a bit over-ambitious depending on how many people you open the class to. I'll be first in line 
-- Ed

-- Ed
Sounds awesome. More driving = goodness!!! (on that note, there should also be more Rally-X's per year, but thats a seperate issue
)
And the second day sounds fun to, much better than simply talking about it and walking around the building. Seems like doing something like your proposing would allow the ideas to sink in a lot more!
Count me in! :banana:
)And the second day sounds fun to, much better than simply talking about it and walking around the building. Seems like doing something like your proposing would allow the ideas to sink in a lot more!
Count me in! :banana:
hoche,
If it could be pulled off as you describe I think it would make for a great time.
On a couple of points
I don't see street odometer being a problem. Though for scoring you might want to divide it into equipped vs non equipped if there are people that have the gear and want to use it.
One way to address the co-driver issue might be to arrange the runs so that drivers can trade off half way through and require that singles pair up with other drivers trading off at the mid point (trading cars as well) This would encourage participants to either attend in pairs or bring their own co-drivers if they want to drive the whole thing. I see is no harm in an "educational situation" in drivers trying a bit of navigation. They might even like it
The idea of notes on the rally cross stage is to get used to a codrive calling the turns for you "at speed". This simulates a real performace rally stage. It's not ideal since the course is necessarily short and possible to see and memorize. since the idea is to educate and whet the appetite this hardly seems to matter. Probably the best that can safely be done in a street car. At the very least it would be fun to try it.
It might be an idea to try this for the instructor "navigated" rally cross you suggest for the first day. In any case it would be easy enough to try at the next rally cross. It would be interesting to see if bemani's concern translates into worse time due to extra weight or better times due to two minds focused on the course, better weight distribution and possibly better traction due to the additional weight.
tim
If it could be pulled off as you describe I think it would make for a great time.
On a couple of points
Originally Posted by hoche
This would give people a real feel for what a rally is like, and real-world experience with timecard management, as well as how MTCs, ATCs, and FTCs work. The only problems I can see are getting a proper codriver-to-driver ratio, and that people'd be using their street cars so they'd have to use the street odometer.
One way to address the co-driver issue might be to arrange the runs so that drivers can trade off half way through and require that singles pair up with other drivers trading off at the mid point (trading cars as well) This would encourage participants to either attend in pairs or bring their own co-drivers if they want to drive the whole thing. I see is no harm in an "educational situation" in drivers trying a bit of navigation. They might even like it

Originally Posted by hoche
[As for notes...I'm not sure how useful they'd be in a rallycross. In the scenario for the second school I mentioned above, they might be because you'd never be running the same rallycross course twice, and wouldn't have a chance to see it ahead of time. Also, the course would probably be set up to be a little less tricky, and with a lot of cones, so there'd be little risk of getting lost. In a normal rallycross, you get to examine the track and walk it and should have it memorized by the time you run it.
It might be an idea to try this for the instructor "navigated" rally cross you suggest for the first day. In any case it would be easy enough to try at the next rally cross. It would be interesting to see if bemani's concern translates into worse time due to extra weight or better times due to two minds focused on the course, better weight distribution and possibly better traction due to the additional weight.
tim
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 176
From: 1999 OBS, 1985 GTI rallycar, 1995 Miata trackcar, 2001 Ford E350 van
Car Info: 1999 OBS
Yeah, I don't really think a street odometer is that big a problem. I wasn't going to have the mini-rally scored competitively. It'd be timed but there'd be no overall times posted, comparing you to other drivers. You'd just get to see your own times. The times through the rallycross are irrelevant - they're just something fun to do and mimic a performance stage. The main point of the exercise is time card and time control management. If we run it competitively, then we run into all sorts of complications like car classification and odometer type, and then there are legal issues about running competitive events on public roads that I don't even want to consider.
I'm still up in the air on having notes at either school, but I'm kinda leaning away from the idea. During the first school, I think it might be too much distraction. The point of having a rallycross is to get the students to use their new toolbox of car control techniques in situations a little wilder than the sequence of turns provides. For the second day, well, mayyyyybe.
I'm still up in the air on having notes at either school, but I'm kinda leaning away from the idea. During the first school, I think it might be too much distraction. The point of having a rallycross is to get the students to use their new toolbox of car control techniques in situations a little wilder than the sequence of turns provides. For the second day, well, mayyyyybe.
250,000-mile Club President
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by hoche
If we run it competitively, then we run into all sorts of complications like car classification and odometer type, and then there are legal issues about running competitive events on public roads that I don't even want to consider.
Someone mentioned the Alcan rally- the winter ones actually do include 3 or 4 ice races as scored portions of the event, the summer ones don't because of the challenges in securing the rallycross location, but having that already lined up, along with ready access to the back roads in the mendo forest, we could do a really cool little cross-over; an assigned average speed "club" rally, including maybe best 2 of 4 rally-X runs, or something like that to add a little designated sideways action, without the costs, permits, communication and medical support and hazards encountered organizing a full on performance rally.
Originally Posted by hoche
I'm still up in the air on having notes at either school, but I'm kinda leaning away from the idea. During the first school, I think it might be too much distraction. The point of having a rallycross is to get the students to use their new toolbox of car control techniques in situations a little wilder than the sequence of turns provides. For the second day, well, mayyyyybe.
Until you are a seed 6 or 7 whatever- you don't get to see them, its easy to develop bad habits in the course of a couple rallies, by the time you see notes you might not be ready to change your mentality.
I think doing at least a basic introduction to notes in a rallycross environment especially in the context of the "second" class could be a really useful addition.
and that way the seed 7 and 8 co-drivers might at least be occasionally thinking in terms of how the road ahead might be called numerically
Last edited by psoper; Oct 25, 2004 at 03:21 PM.


