Question about a wireless phone networks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
AzN121184's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
From: Downtown oakland
Car Info: civic
Question about a wireless phone networks

Does anyone have any experience with T-mobile? Good? Bad?

Btw i'm located around oakland to san jose if that's a question

I'm considering them, they are fairly cheap and the have a variety of phones to choose from, thanks

Last edited by AzN121184; Apr 22, 2004 at 03:01 PM.
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #2  
porkchop's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,440
From: Under a car
Car Info: some silver thing
oakland to san jose? damn thats a big house...
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #3  
yapster's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 350
From: Bay Area (NorCal)
Car Info: 2011 STi
T-mobile is ok. More variety of phone like what you said. But my opinion, I usually get some bad receptions when I really needed them, that is why I settled for Verizon or nextel which shares the same tower and has the best reception in the whole US.
BTW, i i do not work for these company, i just got tired of trying all these wireless company and finally settled for one.
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:56 PM
  #4  
AzN121184's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
From: Downtown oakland
Car Info: civic
Originally posted by porkchop
oakland to san jose? damn thats a big house...
i didn't say house. :banana: I'm usually around those area of the bay, just thought maybe it would have helped to narrow down where i'm usually at. It seems to me that even with verizons network the reception is still somewhat choppy at where i live in, so this is why i'm considering other companies such as t-mobile.

Originally posted by yapster
T-mobile is ok. More variety of phone like what you said. But my opinion, I usually get some bad receptions when I really needed them, that is why I settled for Verizon or nextel which shares the same tower and has the best reception in the whole US.
BTW, i i do not work for these company, i just got tired of trying all these wireless company and finally settled for one.
I have looked at the nationwide/regional network maps and seems to me verizon does have the most coverage in california. Thanks for the help.
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #5  
Akira-R's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,091
From: Bay Area
I've heard that T-Moblie piggy backs Cingulars network as well as having their own towers. Now with Cingular buying ATTWS I'm not sure if they will get to piggyback on ATT's now as well.
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 10:57 PM
  #6  
bassplayrr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,709
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Originally posted by yapster
T-mobile is ok. More variety of phone like what you said. But my opinion, I usually get some bad receptions when I really needed them, that is why I settled for Verizon or nextel which shares the same tower and has the best reception in the whole US.
BTW, i i do not work for these company, i just got tired of trying all these wireless company and finally settled for one.
I would agree. I have T-mobile, and I always find myself borrowing my girlfriend's verizon phone because mine doesn't have signal. As soon as my year contract is up in two months, I am switching to verizon.

-Chris
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
HongKongBeef's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,330
From: http://www.winning-smiles.com
Car Info: 2016 Red WRX
If u are in oakland DO NOT get TMObile. Its HORRIBLE. actaully.. its horrible EVERYWHERE. my gf used to have it. she never had reception anywhere. she lives in oakland also. SF, oakland, east bay, didnt matter. no reception anywhere.
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #8  
AzN121184's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
From: Downtown oakland
Car Info: civic
Originally posted by HongKongBeef
If u are in oakland DO NOT get TMObile. Its HORRIBLE. actaully.. its horrible EVERYWHERE. my gf used to have it. she never had reception anywhere. she lives in oakland also. SF, oakland, east bay, didnt matter. no reception anywhere.
thanks
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 08:54 AM
  #9  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
T-mobile is shaky. Depends on where you are. It's like cingular. In SF it's perfect but I can't get a signal in my house in milpitas to save my life.

I'd say verizon....keep in mind that I work for SBC...we own cingular.

And the AT&T is still at proposal level. It's not that easy to get a $41billion dollar merger/take over set up.

Funny how the company has no money. Can't afford to pay it's employees and give good bonus' but they can give the big man $20 million and have 41 billion laying around.....weird? Weird how we made $8 BILLION dollars in profit in the first quarter of the year.....yeah 3 months.... the strike will most likely happen.
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #11  
stimul8n's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
i have to have 2 phones, because at work and home only 1 or the other gets service... plus i don't have any land line phones so one is more of a "home" phone
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jic
Misc Items For Sale
1
Jan 10, 2009 04:58 PM
bigdsti
Rally
21
Jan 21, 2006 12:02 PM
six1five
Stereo & Security
7
Mar 23, 2004 11:36 AM
Ayapon
Bay Area
13
Dec 24, 2003 10:57 PM
Silky
For Sale by Members
2
Apr 18, 2003 10:42 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 PM.