And it JUST so happened that the place in the pentagon that the "plane" hit was where records were kept regarding $3billion dollars that a certain politician couldn't account for... I have also watched interviews where people said that after the explosion occurred, they walked out of the gaping hole in the side of the building. Because, that could happen if a plane just struck it.. right?

 

INCOMING MORTAR ROUND.. oh wait.. you got this bro? Ok I'm cool.

 

Even ATS says it was a plane? Hot damn. I didn't even need to write a rationed post.

But while I'm here, I'd like to share this excellent story I found on a 9/11 conspiracy site a few minutes ago. It's all about how Justin Bieber has an Illuminati tattoo depicting an owl complete with pictures of tiny "owls" on $1 bills
Justin Bieber’s Illuminati Owl Tattoo | Conspirazzi
^^ these are the people that promote the 9/11 conspiracy... clearly professional investigators.

 

I'm not sure what youre getting at. you realize that people with the highest levels of clearance work at the pentagon right? I'm pretty sure that once the building was, you know, NOT ON FIRE ANYMORE, that general ******** and his aids probably went and walked around in there along with a few 100 policemen and fire officials.

also this is amazing:

trolling conspiracy sites for comedy gold may be a new hobby

 

How was that a response to the fact that the spot where the "plane" hit is where the records were kept for a $3billion dollar loss that no one could account for. There are some interviews of people stating that as the explosion hit they frantically reacted and ran out of the gaping hole.

I will also search YouTube for the video of the side of the Pentagon where there is a huge outward explosion and no plane in the video.

 

Let's not get nit picky. Of course a part like that is not likely to be steel regardless of weight or strength. That is like that so it does not have to be constantly lubed.

I wasn't there, so I didn't see what debris there was or not, but it still seems suspicious. My chick's dad worked at the Pentagon also, but not at the time of the attack. He did not believe it was a plane. If it were a commercial flight, why did we not hear about it like all the others? I never saw the flight number identified like all the others? Private plane? I'm not arguing, I want to know

 

Ha, that should pretty much shut everyone up. Hopefully...

 

Which is funny because inadequate lubrication caused the crash. It was meant only to illustrate a point - planes have been mostly aluminum (whenever structurally possible) since before WWII.

I helped rebuilt a 1939 Stinson 105 - a fairly basic fabric covered aircraft - and the majority of its components were aluminum... If Stinson figured that **** out in the 30's im pretty sure Boeing had SOME idea of how to build aluminum planes by 1981....

the reason i didn't respond is because that charge has been pretty thoroughly debunked:
Missing Trillions - 911myths
It wasn't worth responding to.

 

Fair enough, last time that I had researched the topic or anything was years ago.

 

dude.... what are you talking about? AA Flight #11, tail number N334AA, hit the pentagon. ATC and the military knew it was highjacked more than 30 minutes before it hit the pentagon...

you were expecting a press release?

Correction: Correction, AA Flight 77 (tail N644AA) hit the pentagon.

 

 

ILLUMINTI! lol

 

I guess they never really talked about that one like they did the others. And yes, I did see the flight info on that sight linked, so that answered that.

 

After reading this thread this is what I think.

 

Oh ****.....