need to fight a non-moving violation ticket
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,236
From: San Ramon, CA
Car Info: 91 legacy, 87 mr2, 17 forester xt
need to fight a non-moving violation ticket
hello all,
i got a non moving violation vc38300 and thinking of fighting it. he claims that i did not do a complete stop while i was pretty sure i did.
other than ticketassasin, anyone else have suggestion?
thanks.
i got a non moving violation vc38300 and thinking of fighting it. he claims that i did not do a complete stop while i was pretty sure i did.
other than ticketassasin, anyone else have suggestion?
thanks.
Churro Aficionado
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54,661
From: IG - @thomas.teammoist
Car Info: IG - @TEAMMOISTOFFICIAL
I had a stop sign ticket similar.
I was told to check the "Vehicle Type" according to my registration, and how he wrote it on my ticket. IE Reg = 120, he wrote 01
I was told to check the "Vehicle Type" according to my registration, and how he wrote it on my ticket. IE Reg = 120, he wrote 01
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,046
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
They watch for tire movement. I think that even if you are right, you will have a hard time proving it and will lose that case more often than not. Unless there is something technical wrong on the ticket itself, it may not be an easy win IMO.
Bad Mudder Trucker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,981
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 2013 Forester on Towstrap
A non-moving violation for a failure to stop is pretty hard to fight since it'll be your word vs his words and a judge would more than likely side with his word over yours.
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Pretty much what everyone said...Once I had a similar situation (in different state) where the cop considered "complete stop" as 3 full seconds. The judge ruled "...if that's what the officer deems appropriate for that location and/or conditions". 
How does California count this type of violation? Does it result in any points? If not, it might cost more to fight it than just pay it (which is the whole purpose to most non-point tickets...gravy money).
That said, if it turns out to be a points violation, you have nothing to loose by fighting it and if you have a good/perfect driving record you can try to use that as some leverage. Obviously it will help to be courteous, well dressed/groomed, knowledgeable and articulate about case, have proper representation...pretty much hedging your bets to position yourself in the best light possible as upstanding member of society. If you loose, you still have to pay the ticket.
EDIT: Corrected to clarify a few inferred items in my original post

How does California count this type of violation? Does it result in any points? If not, it might cost more to fight it than just pay it (which is the whole purpose to most non-point tickets...gravy money).
That said, if it turns out to be a points violation, you have nothing to loose by fighting it and if you have a good/perfect driving record you can try to use that as some leverage. Obviously it will help to be courteous, well dressed/groomed, knowledgeable and articulate about case, have proper representation...pretty much hedging your bets to position yourself in the best light possible as upstanding member of society. If you loose, you still have to pay the ticket.
EDIT: Corrected to clarify a few inferred items in my original post
Last edited by LxJLthr; Apr 5, 2016 at 12:08 PM.
So the cop wrote you basically a "failure to obey sign" instead of a stop sign ticket. So he wrote you a ticket that has a lessor fee and doesn't go on your driving record or effect your insurance...
And you are going to fight it...
I have seen this one before...
When you go into traffic court, the judge is going to look at the offense written, and the reason for the offense, rolling through or not stopping at a stop sign...
Then the judge is going to think about how the cop tried to cut you a break by writing you for a lessor charge that has less effect on your wallet and record...
And then the judge is going to think less of you and find you guilty. Cops, 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99% of the time don't cut some one a break on a ticket by writing them on a lessor charge of the offense didn't occur.
If he was going to cite you on the offense that didn't occur, he would write you on the stop sign cvc...giving you points, higher fee and insurance hike...
Good luck though. If you feel that you truly did come to a stop...before the limit line...the. Fight it!!!!
And you are going to fight it...
I have seen this one before...
When you go into traffic court, the judge is going to look at the offense written, and the reason for the offense, rolling through or not stopping at a stop sign...
Then the judge is going to think about how the cop tried to cut you a break by writing you for a lessor charge that has less effect on your wallet and record...
And then the judge is going to think less of you and find you guilty. Cops, 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99% of the time don't cut some one a break on a ticket by writing them on a lessor charge of the offense didn't occur.
If he was going to cite you on the offense that didn't occur, he would write you on the stop sign cvc...giving you points, higher fee and insurance hike...
Good luck though. If you feel that you truly did come to a stop...before the limit line...the. Fight it!!!!
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
^^^
Are you A) Current/former cop B) Traffic attorney or C) County judge with significant duty and/or court time with knowledge of behavioral trends to make such sweeping assumptions and generalizations? If not, is that not a bit overreaching as far an key board lawyer-ing goes?

Are you A) Current/former cop B) Traffic attorney or C) County judge with significant duty and/or court time with knowledge of behavioral trends to make such sweeping assumptions and generalizations? If not, is that not a bit overreaching as far an key board lawyer-ing goes?
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
I never said the judge cannot change the ticket. I asked what type of ticket it was and if it might be more trouble than it is worth fighting it.
IF it is a point ticket THEN one has nothing to loose by fighting it.
You said, "...you have nothing to loose by fighting it..."
That is what I was responding to. So yes...he can loose something. He can loose a lessor citation and have a greater citation added.
That is what I was responding to. So yes...he can loose something. He can loose a lessor citation and have a greater citation added.
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!

Uh, yes, the always present drama of internet semantics, selective and/or out-of-context comprehension and/or general lost in translation miscommunications due to impossible to know individual biases from behind a computer screen

At the end of the day both yours and mine limited personal experiences are single inconsequential data points that are worth absolutely shayt in the grand scheme of things


