I have a theory...
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 502
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: '11 GV WRX, '12 Chevy Tahoe LTZ, '19 Kawi Z400
Yeah depends on how you're defining "better". I assume you mean aesthetically? Or do you mean performance wise or something else?
Call me Pebbles
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,908
From: I do all my own physics.
Car Info: Moist
As life-long student of science, this is one of my biggest pet peeves, if not the biggest: you have a hypothesis, not a theory.
/soapbox
Back to your hypothesis, I present the following:
2018 Ferrari 458:

Ferrari LaFerrari:

Lamborghini Sesto Elemento:

Sorry. Major hard-on for Italians..
And now my counter-points:
2018 Toyota Prius:

Nissan Leaf:
/soapbox
Back to your hypothesis, I present the following:
2018 Ferrari 458:

Ferrari LaFerrari:

Lamborghini Sesto Elemento:

Sorry. Major hard-on for Italians..
And now my counter-points:
2018 Toyota Prius:

Nissan Leaf:
Thread Starter
It's QQ thankyouverymuch
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19,721
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 SWP WRX Hatch
Theory:
Sounds right to me. 

Ferraris suck
a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena:


Ferraris suck
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,301
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: http://kiva.org/invitedby/brett4254
You may be on to something

Ok - so it seems to be impossible to post a photo to the board right now

Ok - so it seems to be impossible to post a photo to the board right now
Last edited by Lowend; Jan 12, 2017 at 03:54 PM.
Call me Pebbles
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,908
From: I do all my own physics.
Car Info: Moist
A common misconception.
What you posed is a hypothetical statement in which you offered a possible explanation for causal correlation of vehicular quality on the difference in overall body width and headlight separation.
A scientific theory is a set of exhaustive and supportive conclusions drawn from repeated and repeatable experimentation which accurately and repeatedly predict the outcome of any future testing of the hypothetical statement.
You posed a hypothesis, you did not present a theory.
A scientific theory is a set of exhaustive and supportive conclusions drawn from repeated and repeatable experimentation which accurately and repeatedly predict the outcome of any future testing of the hypothetical statement.
You posed a hypothesis, you did not present a theory.
What you posed is a hypothetical statement in which you offered a possible explanation for causal correlation of vehicular quality on the difference in overall body width and headlight separation.
A scientific theory is a set of exhaustive and supportive conclusions drawn from repeated and repeatable experimentation which accurately and repeatedly predict the outcome of any future testing of the hypothetical statement.
You posed a hypothesis, you did not present a theory.
A scientific theory is a set of exhaustive and supportive conclusions drawn from repeated and repeatable experimentation which accurately and repeatedly predict the outcome of any future testing of the hypothetical statement.
You posed a hypothesis, you did not present a theory.
<<<<< n3rd
and not necessarily just about the sciency-type stuff
VIP Member
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,642
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2000 Legacy GT, 2000 Echo 1989 Camry All-Trac
Headlight position is somewhat arbitrary, within the realm of adjusting the beam pattern at a reasonable distance. Track width is an objective metric that typically translates to better performance/is seen in more sporty cars.
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Did you already have a conclusion in mind and now trying to selectively build evidence to prove it true? I feel like the 1st post picture is trying to justify that you "widebody" GR model is the bestest one short of a full on track day car...



