fine for running catless

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:26 AM
  #1  
silvrwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 235
From: Dublin, CA
Car Info: 12' Forester
fine for running catless

does any one know what the maximum fine is for running catless??? ive talked to a variety of people about it and i get a lot of different answers.

jeremy
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:59 AM
  #2  
AzN121184's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
From: Downtown oakland
Car Info: civic
please pm iloqin.



he just got one, er not him, but his car
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
chrisw's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 435
From: keep santa cruz weird
Car Info: 2003 blue EVO
http://www.arb.ca.gov/bluebook/bluebook.htm
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:04 AM
  #4  
En3D's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,791
From: Bay Area, CA
IMO, it's not worth it. the damage to the environment and potential fines for a few HPs.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:13 AM
  #5  
dz's Avatar
dz
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,451
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 1996 Mustang GT/2013 Outback Limited
deleted

Last edited by dz; Jul 21, 2005 at 09:25 PM.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:13 AM
  #6  
qwk_wrx's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,349
From: Rohnert Park
Car Info: 05' Evo 8
i believe it is a fix it ticket and you get sent to the Ref....

I had a TX-s Stealth back with a high flow cat in it but you must take out the stock DP and Up pipe to get good gains especially if you are goin get a bigger turbo..
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
En3D's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,791
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by dz
Let me guess, you live in Berkeley...

I had a pair of aftermarket converters on my Mustang (the car had 6 stock). The aftermarket cats burned cleaner than the stock cats did but I still got busted for running them. I was faced with a choice:
Pay a $30,000 fine (5K for each converter removed)
-or-
Go to a referee every year for the next 5 years to have my car gone over with a fine toothed comb

I picked #2
It sounds like the berkeley comment was toward tree hugging hippies who care about the planet. sooner or later we all or our children will pay for the environment pollution.

my comment was if you do an exhaust, have a cat. it's better for the environment and potentially your wallet... for what 10 more HP.

so why did you run cats on the rustang? probably for the same reasons that I stated. do you live in berkeley? I just don't want the BA to turn into LA.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 11:35 AM
  #8  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
Originally posted by En3D
It sounds like the berkeley comment was toward tree hugging hippies who care about the planet. sooner or later we all or our children will pay for the environment pollution.

my comment was if you do an exhaust, have a cat. it's better for the environment and potentially your wallet... for what 10 more HP.

so why did you run cats on the rustang? probably for the same reasons that I stated. do you live in berkeley? I just don't want the BA to turn into LA.

Maybe you didn’t see the part where Dan said he car burned cleaner using aftermarket cats instead of the 6 factory ones, but still got a fine for it

and if you were really upset about the state of our environment, you would be more upset about big businesses around the state that are allowed to dump 10x more pollutants into the air because CARB made a deal with the EPA. Less pollution from the cars and the EPA let them allow factories and refineries to pollute more then ever before.

yay for caring about our environment

Last edited by Max Xevious; Jan 29, 2004 at 11:38 AM.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #9  
En3D's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,791
From: Bay Area, CA
I did see that his car ran cleaner. but that's not what is being talked about, catless or not. not aftermarket and stock.

we have direct control of what is on or off our cars.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #10  
dz's Avatar
dz
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,451
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 1996 Mustang GT/2013 Outback Limited
deleted

Last edited by dz; Jul 21, 2005 at 09:25 PM.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #11  
bluwrxwgn's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,074
From: BAIC Wagon Clique
Car Info: '02 WRB WRX Wagon
That's why I have a Catted downpipe. Nobody's the wiser. Of course it's completely burned out now from running rich, but oh well.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #12  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
i'm just gonna see how much hp can be squeezed out of the stock DP. catless is not an option for me, and i really have second thoughts about running an aftermarket cat.

does anyone know the law on when it is legal to replace a OEM cat with an aftermarket? isn't it 60k miles?
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
dz's Avatar
dz
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,451
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 1996 Mustang GT/2013 Outback Limited
deleted

Last edited by dz; Jul 21, 2005 at 09:25 PM.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
.. which is utter crap
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #15  
qwk_wrx's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,349
From: Rohnert Park
Car Info: 05' Evo 8
CARB sucks!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:46 PM.